Oct 20, 2016 - Rehabilitation Protocols, Ventilator Liberation Protocols, and Cuff Leak ... American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Volume ...
compression syndrome ( âeffort thrombosisâ or Paget-. SchrÃ¶tter disease) [5,9]. Upper-extremity DVT is commonly associated with the presence of indwelling ...
Apr 8, 2017 - book on the integration of Muslims into American society. ... to be sure, no organization in the United States today bearing the name the Muslim.
(ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer and the utility of these receptors as predictive markers. Methods.âThe American Society of ...
A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on .... Noninvasive approaches have been developed to detect the ...... Research Grant.
âSurgical site infection (SSI) and post-procedure pneumonia. (PPP) monitoring ... lists to select which operative procedure to report.â Selection list: 1. small bowel ...
also received support (not financial support/funding) from different ... dation, the European Neuromuscular Centre, the International. Myositis ... lized to derive the classification criteria. Results. Based on .... cality of capturing the items show
Apr 5, 2005 - ... College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees on January 26, ..... bundle-branch block; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ACS, ...
Jan 1, 2009 - ... and the efficacy of treatments for IBS. e Task Force recommends that ... cificity of 85 % ; Rome II and Rome III have not yet been evalu- ated. None of the .... typical IBS symptoms and no alarm features because of a low likelihood
Rating Scale: 1,2,3 Usually not appropriate; 4,5,6 May be appropriate; 7,8,9 Usually appropriate. *Relative. Radiation ... Rib fractures typically affect the fifth through ninth ribs. .... These fractures are more commonly anterior, on the left side,
Authors. Brian P. Rubin, MD, PhD, FCAP*. Departments of Anatomic Pathology and Molecular Genetics, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner Research. Institute and Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio. Charles D. Blanke, MD, FACP. British Columbia Cancer Agency an
Nov 1, 2001 - Interpretation. The purpose of this Joint American Thoracic Society/American. Idelle M. Weisman, Charles G. Gallagher, Fernando J. College of Chest Physicians ... graphic interrelationships, the physiologic response to exercise ..... wo
WASHINGTON POSTER FINALIST - RESEARCH Joseph Hiram Parker, IV DO. 169. Chapter Winning ..... or zoledronic acid from June 2010 to December 2011 at Sanford Health, Fargo. Laboratory data ... on maintenance T4 gained more weight in both absolute pounds
program for IMRT treatment planning and delivery that includes (a) systematic .... VMAT delivery it also affects the dose within the target because the leaves build ...
students stay in school and are academically successful. ..... Participant responses to interview questions ..... Murtaugh, P. A., L.D., Burns and J., Schuster. 1999.
Feb 1, 2006 - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty ... This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jefferson Digital ... publishes evidence-based practice guidelines.1 ACOG practice bulletins are perhaps the.
money on the traditional model of. âsick-careâ and eventual ..... well as the workforce of the fu- ture must be put on an .... 20070703_mi_en.pdf. Accessed Novem-.
poraneous autologous bone marrow transplantation. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 1994, 179: ... TPN, Total parenteral nutrition; y, year; h, hour, and mo, month. Numbers in ...
Review: Metabolic Control of Immune System Activation in Rheumatic Diseases ... Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for.
Imaging for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ... In patients of high surgical risk, TAVR has been feasible using transfemoral, transapical, or, less commonly, ... 8Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, American College of Cardiology. ..... Invasiv
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) affects nearly 8 million patients in the ... postoperative year, up to 30% of venous grafts develop stenoses . ... PSFV >200 cm/sec at any point in the graft or a midgraft PSFV
Recent data suggest that a PPI, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin for 10 days is ..... effective than PPI therapy in reducing the risk of peptic ul- ...... 1999;131:668â72.
Apr 1, 2007 - The American College of Occupational and Environ- mental Medicine (ACOEM) is a professional associa- tion that represents the interests of its company- employed physician members. Fifty years ago the. ACOEM began to assert itself in the
Aspirin use mitigates the risk associated with low-dose but not high-dose rofecoxib. ... cerns regarding their potential cardiovascular toxicity were first raised in ...
Parenteral Anticoagulants: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Jack Hirsh, Kenneth A. Bauer, Maria B. Donati, Michael Gould, Meyer M. Samama and Jeffrey I. Weitz Chest 2008;133;141-159 DOI 10.1378/chest.08-0689
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services can be found online on the World Wide Web at: http://chestjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/133/6_suppl/141S
CHEST is the official journal of the American College of Chest Physicians. It has been published monthly since 1935. Copyright 2007 by the American College of Chest Physicians, 3300 Dundee Road, Northbrook IL 60062. All rights reserved. No part of this article or PDF may be reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of the copyright holder (http://www.chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml). ISSN: 0012-3692.
Supplement ANTITHROMBOTIC AND THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY 8TH ED: ACCP GUIDELINES
Parenteral Anticoagulants* American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Jack Hirsh, MD, FCCP; Kenneth A. Bauer, MD; Maria B. Donati, MD, PhD; Michael Gould, MD, FCCP; Meyer M. Samama, MD; and Jeffrey I. Weitz, MD, FCCP
This chapter describes the pharmacology of approved parenteral anticoagulants, including the indirect anticoagulants, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, and danaparoid as well as the direct thrombin inhibitors hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a unique pentasaccharide sequence and catalyze the inactivation of thrombin factor Xa and other clotting factors. Heparin also binds to cells and other plasma proteins, endowing it with unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and can lead to nonhemorrhagic side effects, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis. LMWHs have greater inhibitory activity against factor Xa than thrombin and exhibit less binding to cells and proteins than heparin. Consequently, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, have a longer half-life than heparin, and have a lower risk of nonhemorrhagic side effects. LMWHs can be administered once or twice daily by subcutaneous injection, without anticoagulant monitoring. Based on their greater convenience, LMWHs have replaced UFH for many clinical indications. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, catalyzes the inhibition of factor Xa, but not thrombin, in an antithrombin-dependent fashion. Fondaparinux binds only to antithrombin; therefore, HIT and osteoporosis are unlikely to occur. Fondaparinux has excellent bioavailability when administered subcutaneously, has a longer half-life than LMWHs, and is given once daily by subcutaneous injection in fixed doses, without anticoagulant monitoring. Three parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors and danaparoid are approved as alternatives to heparin in HIT patients. (CHEST 2008; 133:141S–159S) Key words: argatroban; bivalirudin; fondaparinux; hirudin; low-molecular-weight heparin; unfractionated heparin Abbreviations: APTT ⫽ activated partial thromboplastin time; AT ⫽ antithrombin; CrCl ⫽ creatinine clearance; HCII ⫽ heparin cofactor II; HIT ⫽ heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; INR ⫽ international normalized ratio; LMWH ⫽ low-molecular-weight heparin; PF4 ⫽ platelet factor 4; UFH ⫽ unfractionated heparin
Summary of Recommendations 2.2.3 Monitoring Antithrombotic Effect 2.2.3 In patients treated with LMWH, we recommend against routine coagulation monitoring (Grade 1C). In pregnant women treated with therapeutic doses of LMWH, we recommend monitoring of anti-Xa levels (Grade 1C). www.chestjournal.org
2.2.4 Dosing and Monitoring in Special Situations 2.2.4 In obese patients given LMWH prophylaxis or treatment, we suggest weight-based dosing (Grade 2C). In patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 30 mL/min) who require therapeutic anticoagulation, we suggest the use of UFH instead of LMWH (Grade 2C). If LMWH is used in patients with severe renal insuffiCHEST / 133 / 6 / JUNE, 2008 SUPPLEMENT
ciency (CrCl < 30 mL/min) who require therapeutic anticoagulation, we suggest using 50% of the recommended dose (Grade 2C). 3.0 Direct Thrombin Inhibitors 3.0 In patients who receive either lepirudin or desirudin and have renal insufficiency (CrCl < 60 mL/min but > 30 mL/min), we recommend that the dose be reduced and the drug be monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (Grade 1C). In patients with a CrCl < 30 mL/min, we recommend against the use of lepirudin or desirudin (Grade 1C). In patients who require anticoagulation and have previously received lepirudin or desirudin, we recommend against repeated use of these drugs because of the risk of anaphylaxis (Grade 1C). 3.1 Monitoring of Direct Thrombin Inhibitors 3.1 In patients receiving argatroban who are being transitioned to a vitamin K antagonist, we suggest that factor X levels measured using a chromogenic assay be used to adjust the dose of the vitamin K antagonist (Grade 2C). chapter focuses on parenteral anticoagulants T hisin current use. These agents can be classified as
indirect anticoagulants whose activity is mediated by plasma cofactors, and direct anticoagulants that do not require plasma cofactors to express their activity. The indirect parenteral anticoagulants in current use include heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, and danaparoid. These drugs have little or no intrinsic anticoagulant activity, and exert their anticoagulant activity by activating antithrombin (AT), an endogenous inhibitor of various activated clotting factors. The parenteral direct anticoagulants in current use all target thrombin. These agents include recombinant hirudins, bivalirudin, and argatroban.
*From the Hamilton Civic Hospitals, Henderson Research Centre (Dr. Hirsh), Hamilton, ON, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Dr. Bauer), Boston, MA; Centre for High Technology and Education in Biomedical Sciences (Dr. Donati), Catholic University, C.da Tappino, Campobasso, Italy; VA Palo Alto Health Care System (Dr. Gould), Palo Alto, CA; Hoˆtel-Dieu University Hospital (Dr. Samama), Paris, France; and Henderson Research Centre and McMaster University (Dr. Weitz), Hamilton, ON, Canada. Manuscript accepted December 20, 2007. Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal. org/misc/reprints.shtml). Correspondence to: Jack Hirsh, MD, FCCP, Henderson Research Centre, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C3, Canada; e-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-0689 142S
2.0 Indirect Parenteral Anticoagulants 2.1 Heparin About 90 years ago, McLean1 discovered that heparin has antithrombotic properties. Brinkhous et al2 then demonstrated that heparin is an indirect anticoagulant and requires a plasma cofactor to express its anticoagulant activity. Abildgaard3 subsequently identified this cofactor as ATIII in 1968, but it is now referred to as AT. The major anticoagulant action of heparin is mediated by the heparin/AT interaction. The mechanism of this interaction was elucidated in 1970s.4 – 6 Heparin binds to lysine residues on AT, producing a conformational change at the arginine reactive center that converts AT from a slow, progressive thrombin inhibitor to a rapid inhibitor. The arginine reactive center on AT binds covalently to the active center serine of thrombin and other coagulation enzymes, thereby irreversibly inhibiting their procoagulant activity.5 Heparin then dissociates from AT and is reutilized (Fig 1). Heparin binds to AT through a glucosamine unit4 –7 contained within a unique pentasaccharide sequence.8 The development of LMWH in the 1980s introduced the concept that only heparin chains of sufficient length to bridge AT to thrombin potentiate thrombin inhibition. In contrast, heparin chains of any length that contain the high affinity pentasaccharide can catalyze factor Xa inhibition by AT. The AT-binding pentasaccharide has now been synthesized and developed into a drug called fondaparinux.9 –12
Figure 1. Inactivation of clotting enzymes by heparin. Top panel: ATIII is a slow inhibitor without heparin. Middle panel: Heparin binds to ATIII through a high-affinity pentasaccharide and induces a conformational change in ATIII, thereby converting ATIII from a slow inhibitor to a very rapid inhibitor. Bottom panel: ATIII binds covalently to the clotting enzyme, and the heparin dissociates from the complex and can be reutilized. Reprinted with permission from CHEST. Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy 8th Ed: ACCP Guidelines
Table 1—Molecular Size, Anticoagulant Activity, and Pharmacokinetic Properties of Heparin Attribute Molecular size Anticoagulant activity
Characteristics Mean molecular weight, 15,000 (range, 3,000 to 30,000) Only one third of heparin molecules contain the high-affinity pentasaccharide required for anticoagulant activity High-molecular-weight moieties are cleared more rapidly than low-molecular-weight moieties
2.1.1 Structure and Mechanism of Action: Heparin is a highly sulfated mucopolysaccharide. It is heterogeneous with respect to molecular size, anticoagulant activity, and pharmacokinetic properties (Table 1). Heparin ranges in molecular weight from 3,000 to 30,000 with a mean of 15,000, which corresponds to approximately 45 saccharide units13–15 (Fig 2). Only about one third of the heparin molecules possess the unique pentasaccharide sequence, and it is this fraction that is responsible for most of the anticoagulant effect of heparin.13,16 Heparin chains that lack this pentasaccharide sequence have minimal anticoagulant activity when heparin is given in therapeutic concentrations. However, at concentrations higher than those usually administered clinically, heparin chains with or without the pentasaccharide sequence can catalyze thrombin inhibition by heparin cofactor II (HCII), a second plasma cofactor.17 At even higher concentrations, low-affinity heparin impairs factor Xa generation through AT- and HCII-independent mechanisms18 (Table 2). The heparin/AT complex inactivates thrombin (factor IIa) and factors Xa, IXa, XIa, and XIIa.5 Thrombin and factor Xa are most sensitive to inhibition by heparin/AT, and thrombin is about 10-fold more sensitive to inhibition than factor Xa. Heparin catalyzes AT-mediated thrombin inhibition by bind-
Figure 2. Molecular weight distributions of LMWHs and heparin. Reprinted with permission from CHEST. www.chestjournal.org
Table 2—Anticoagulant Effects of Heparin Effect
Binds to AT and catalyzes the inactivation of thrombin and factors IIa, Xa, IXa, Xia, and XIIa
Major mechanism for anticoagulant effect, produced by only one third of heparin molecules (those containing the unique AT-binding pentasaccharide) Requires high concentrations of heparin and is independent of the pentasaccharide Requires very high concentration of heparin and is AT and HCII independent
Binds to HCII and catalyzes inactivation of factor Iia Binds to factor IXa and inhibits factor X activation
ing both to AT, via its pentasaccharide sequence, and to thrombin, in a nonspecific charge-dependent fashion, to form a ternary heparin/AT/thrombin complex. In contrast, to catalyze factor Xa inhibition by AT, heparin needs only to bind to AT via its high-affinity pentasaccharide.7 Heparin chains consisting of ⬍ 18 saccharide units are too short to bridge thrombin and AT. Consequently, these chains are unable to catalyze thrombin inhibition. However, as long as they possess a pentasaccharide, short heparin chains can catalyze inhibition of factor Xa by AT.19 –22 By inactivating thrombin or attenuating its generation, heparin not only prevents fibrin formation, but also inhibits thrombin-induced activation of platelets and factors V, VIII, and XI.23–25 The interaction of heparin with HCII is charge dependent, but pentasaccharide-independent catalysis of HCII requires a higher concentration of heparin than that needed to promote thrombin inhibition by AT. The capacity of heparin capacity to activate HCII is also chain-length dependent with maximum catalysis, requiring heparin chains comprising a minimum of 24 saccharide units.17 The third anticoagulant effect of heparin, which reflects AT- and HCII-independent modulation of factor Xa generation, is charge dependent and mediated by heparin binding to factor IXa. The effect is clinically unimportant because it requires doses of heparin considerably higher than those used therapeutically.18 In vitro, heparin binds to platelets and, depending on the experimental conditions, can either induce or inhibit platelet aggregation.26,27 Highmolecular-weight-heparin fractions with low affinity for AT have a greater effect on platelet function than LMWH fractions with high AT affinity.28 Heparin can prolong the bleeding time in humans29 and enhances blood loss from the microvasculature in rabbits.30 –32 The interaction of heparin with platelets31 and endothelial cells30 may contribute to heparininduced bleeding by mechanisms independent of its anticoagulant effect.32 CHEST / 133 / 6 / JUNE, 2008 SUPPLEMENT
In addition to its anticoagulant effects, heparin attenuates the proliferation of vascular smooth-muscle cells,33,34 inhibits osteoblast formation, and activates osteoclasts; these last two effects promote bone loss.35,36 Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most important nonhemorrhagic side effect of heparin, which is discussed by Warkentin et al212 in a separate chapter. 2.1.2 Pharmacokinetics: Heparin is not absorbed orally and, therefore, must be administered parenterally. The two preferred routes of administration are by continuous IV infusion or subcutaneous injection. When the subcutaneous route is selected for delivery of treatment doses of heparin, the dose of heparin should be higher than the usual IV dose to overcome the reduced bioavailability associated with subcutaneous administration.37,38 If an immediate anticoagulant effect is required, the initial subcutaneous dose of heparin can be accompanied by an IV bolus injection. Administration by subcutaneous injection in low doses39 of 5,000 U q12h, moderate doses of 12,500 U q12h,40 or larger doses of 15,000 U q12h reduces the plasma recovery of heparin.37 However, at high therapeutic doses (⬎ 35,000 U/24 h), plasma recovery is almost complete.38 After entering the blood stream, heparin binds to a number of plasma proteins, which reduces its anticoagulant activity. This phenomenon contributes to the variability of the anticoagulant response to heparin among patients with thromboembolic disorders41 and to the laboratory phenomenon of heparin resistance.42 Heparin also binds to endothelial cells43 and macrophages, a property that further complicates its pharmacokinetics. Binding of heparin to von Willebrand factor also inhibits von Willebrand factordependent platelet function.44 Heparin is cleared through a combination of a rapid saturable and a much slower first-order mechanism45– 47 (Fig 3). The saturable phase of heparin clearance is thought to be due to binding to endothelial cell receptors48 and macrophages.49 Bound heparin is internalized and depolymerized50,51 (Fig 4). The slower nonsaturable mechanism of clearance is largely renal. At therapeutic doses, a large proportion of heparin is cleared through the rapid saturable, dose-dependent mechanism. The complex kinetics of clearance renders the anticoagulant response to heparin nonlinear at therapeutic doses, with both the intensity and duration of effect rising disproportionately with increasing dose. Thus, the apparent biological half-life of heparin increases from approximately 30 min after an IV bolus of 25 U/kg,45 to 60 min with an IV bolus of 100 U/kg,46 to 150 min with a bolus of 400 U/kg.47 144S
Figure 3. Low doses of heparin clear rapidly from plasma through a saturable (cellular) mechanism and the slower, nonsaturable, dose-independent mechanism of renal clearance. Very high doses of heparin are cleared predominantly through the slower nonsaturable mechanism of clearance. t ⫽ half-life. Reprinted with permission from CHEST.
2.1.3 Initial Dosing: The efficacy of heparin in the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism critically depends on dosage. Based on the results of randomized studies,37,52 patients assigned to lower starting doses of heparin had higher recurrence rates than those treated with higher doses. In the randomized study by Hull et al,37 patients with venous thrombosis were assigned to receive identical doses of heparin (an IV bolus of 5,000 U and 30,000 U/d), but one group received 15,000 U of heparin q12h by subcutaneous injection and the other 30,000 U of heparin per day by continuous IV infusion. Because of the reduced bioavailability of heparin after subcutaneous injection, patients assigned to the IV heparin regimen received substantially more heparin. The IV-administered heparin was more effective as evidenced by the observation that the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was in the target range at 24 h in 71% of patients who received IV heparin, and in only 37% of those given subcutaneous heparin. Patients assigned to IV heparin had a significantly lower rate of recurrence than those given subcutaneous heparin.
Figure 4. As heparin enters the circulation, it binds to heparinbinding proteins (ie, other plasma proteins), endothelial cells, macrophages, and ATIII. Only heparin with the high-affinity pentasaccharide binds to ATIII, but binding to other proteins and to cells is nonspecific and occurs independently of the ATIII binding site. Reprinted with permission from CHEST. Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy 8th Ed: ACCP Guidelines
Raschke et al52 randomized patients to receive heparin in fixed doses (5,000-U bolus followed by 1,000 U/h infusion) or adjusted doses using a weightbased nomogram (starting dose, 80-U/kg bolus followed by 18 U/kg/h infusion). Patients whose heparin was weight adjusted received higher doses within the first 24 h than those given fixed doses. The rate of recurrent thromboembolism was significantly lower with the weight-adjusted heparin regimen. Initial dosing of IV heparin for venous thromboembolism is either weight-based (80 U/kg bolus and 18 U/kg/h infusion52) or administered as a bolus of 5,000 U followed by an infusion of at least 32,000 U/d.53 If heparin is given subcutaneously for treatment of venous thromboembolism, there are at least two options: (1) an initial IV bolus of approximately 5,000 U followed by 250 U/kg bid54; or (2) an initial subcutaneous dose of 333 U/kg followed by 250 U/kg bid.55 The doses of heparin recommended for treatment of acute coronary syndromes are lower than those used to treat venous thromboembolism. Thus, the American College of Cardiology56 recommends a heparin bolus of 60 to 70 U/kg (maximum 5,000 U) followed by an infusion of 12 to 15 U/kg/h (maximum 1,000 U/h) for unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Even lower doses of heparin are recommended57 when heparin is given in conjunction with fibrinolytic agents for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Here, the bolus is about 60 U/kg (maximum 4,000 U), and the infusion is 12 U/kg/h (maximum of 1,000 U/kg/h). 2.1.4 Monitoring: The risk of heparin-associated bleeding increases with heparin dose58,59 and with concomitant administration of fibrinolytic agents60 – 63 or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.64,65 The risk of bleeding also is increased by recent surgery, trauma, invasive procedures, or concomitant hemostatic defects.66 Investigators have reported a relationship between the dose of heparin administered and both its efficacy37,50,67 and safety.64,65 Because the anticoagulant response to heparin varies among patients, it
is standard practice to monitor heparin and to adjust the dose based on the results of coagulation tests. The evidence for adjusting the dose of heparin to maintain a therapeutic range is weak and based on a post hoc subgroup analysis of a descriptive study.68 In contrast, the evidence for maintaining the international normalized ratio (INR) within a therapeutic range in patients who are treated with vitamin K antagonists is strong because it is based on consistent results of randomized trials and case-control studies. When given in therapeutic doses, the anticoagulant effect of heparin is usually monitored using the APPT. The activated clotting time is used to monitor the higher heparin doses given to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions or cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. A retrospective study done in the 1970s suggested that an APTT ratio between 1.5 and 2.5 was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism.68 Based on this study, a therapeutic APTT range of 1.5 to 2.5 times control gained wide acceptance. The clinical relevance of this therapeutic range is uncertain because the validity of this range has not been confirmed by randomized trials and because the reagents and instruments used to measure the APTT have changed.69 –78 Depending on the APTT reagent and the coagulometer used for the test, APTT results ranging from 48 to 108 s can be measured in samples with a heparin concentration of 0.3 U/mL, as determined using an anti-Xa assay.71,73 With heparin levels of 0.3 to 0.7 anti-Xa U/mL, modern APTT reagents and coagulometers produce APTT ratios that range from 1.6 to 2.7 times to 3.7 to 6.2 times control.69 –74,76 – 83 Although various heparin dose-adjustment nomograms have been developed (Tables 3, 453,67), none is applicable to all APTT reagents.73 For these reasons, the therapeutic APTT range should be adapted to the responsiveness of the reagent and coagulometer used.69,72,74,75,77,78,80,82– 85 In the study that established a therapeutic range for the APTT,68 the APTT ratio of 1.5 to 2.5 corresponded to a heparin level of 0.2 to 0.4 U by protamine titration and a heparin level of 0.3 to 0.7 U
Table 3—Protocol for Heparin Dose Adjustment* APTT, s ⬍ 50 50–59 60–85 86–95 96–120 ⬎ 120
Repeat Bolus Dose, U
Stop Infusion, min
Change Rate (Dose) of Infusion mL/h at 40 U/mL (U per 24 h)
Initial dose APTT, ⬍ 35 s APTT, 35–45 s APTT, 46–70 s† APTT, 71–90 s APTT, ⬎ 90 s
80 U/kg bolus, then 18 U/kg/h 80 U/kg bolus, then increase 4 U/kg/h 40 U/kg bolus, then increase 2 U/kg/h No change Decrease infusion rate by 2 U/kg/h Hold infusion 1 h, then decrease infusion rate by 3 U/kg/h
*Adapted from Raschke et al67/1996. †Therapeutic APTT range of 46 to 70 s corresponded to anti-Xa activity of 0.3 to 0.7 U/mL.
measured by an anti-Xa assay. Like APTT assays, anti-Xa assays vary in their responsiveness to heparin. Therefore, an appropriate anti-Xa assay should be selected for adjusting the APTT range. For treatment of venous thrombosis, it would be reasonable to select an APTT range that correlates with a heparin level of 0.3 to 0.7 U anti-Xa (or 0.2 to 0.4 U by protamine titration). The therapeutic range for coronary indications is unknown but is likely to correspond to heparin levels that are about 10% lower than used to treat patients with venous thromboembolism. The results of a randomized trial55 in patients with venous thromboembolism that showed that unmonitored weight-adjusted subcutaneous heparin given twice daily in high doses was as safe and effective as weight-adjusted LMWH challenges the need for APTT monitoring of heparin administered subcutaneously. 2.1.5 Heparin Resistance: Heparin resistance is a term used to describe the situation when patients require unusually high doses of heparin to achieve a therapeutic APTT.86 – 88 Several mechanisms explain heparin resistance, including AT deficiency,75 increased heparin clearance,41,87 elevations in heparin-binding proteins,42,89 and elevations in factor VIII88,90 and/or fibrinogen.90 Aprotinin and nitroglycerin may cause drug-induced heparin resistance,91,92 although the association with nitroglycerin is controversial.93 Elevated levels of factor VIII represent a common mechanism for apparent heparin resistance.88 Because elevated factor VIII levels shorten the APTT, there is a dissociation between the APTT and heparin levels measured by anti-Xa activity.87,88 In patients with venous thromboembolism who required large doses of heparin (⬎ 35,000 U/d), those randomized to heparin dosing based on anti-Xa levels (target range, 0.35 to 0.7 U/mL) had similar clinical outcomes and received lower doses of heparin than those randomized to dose adjustment based on APTT values.88 Given these results, it is reason146S
able to adjust heparin doses based on anti-Xa levels in patients with venous thromboembolism who require high doses of heparin to achieve a therapeutic APTT. 2.1.6 Limitations of Heparin: In addition to hemorrhagic complications, heparin has limitations based on its pharmacokinetic properties; its ability to induce immune-mediated platelet activation, which can lead to HIT (discussed in chapter on HIT by Warkentin et al212); and its effect on bone metabolism, which can lead to osteoporosis. Other nonhemorrhagic side effects are very uncommon and include skin reactions that can progress to necrosis, alopecia, and hypersensitivity.94 Heparin therapy also can cause elevations of serum transaminases. This phenomenon is benign and not associated with liver disease. AT-independent binding of heparin to plasma proteins,95 proteins released from platelets19 and possibly to endothelial cells, result in the variable anticoagulant response to heparin and to the phenomenon of heparin resistance88; AT-independent binding to macrophages and endothelial cells also results in its dose-dependent mechanism of clearance. The main nonhemorrhagic side effects of heparin are HIT and osteoporosis. HIT is caused by heparindependent antibodies, which usually are of the IgG subclass, that bind to a conformationally modified epitope on platelet factor 4 (PF4). Simultaneous binding of these antibodies to Fc receptors on the platelet surface causes platelet activation. Activated platelets are removed from the circulation, which causes thrombocytopenia. In addition, these activated platelets and microparticles provide a surface onto which coagulation factor complexes can assemble to promote thrombin generation. This phenomenon can then trigger venous or arterial thrombosis. Osteoporosis is caused by binding of heparin to osteoblasts,36 which then release factors that activate osteoclasts. 2.1.7 Reversing the Anticoagulant Effect of Heparin: One advantage of heparin is that IV protamine sulfate can rapidly reverse its anticoagulant effects. Protamine sulfate is a basic protein derived from fish sperm that binds to heparin to form a stable salt. Protamine sulfate, 1 mg, will neutralize approximately 100 U of heparin. Therefore, a patient who bleeds immediately after receiving an IV bolus of 5,000 U of heparin requires 50 mg of protamine sulfate to neutralize the heparin. Protamine sulfate is cleared from the circulation with a half-life of about 7 min. Because the half-life of IV heparin is 60 to 90 min when heparin is given as an IV infusion, only heparin given during the preceding several hours needs to be considered when calculating the dose of protamine sulfate that needs to be administered. Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy 8th Ed: ACCP Guidelines
Therefore, a patient receiving a continuous IV infusion of heparin at 1,250 U/h requires approximately 30 mg of protamine sulfate. Neutralization of subcutaneously administered heparin may require a prolonged infusion of protamine sulfate. The APTT can be used to assess the effectiveness of protamine sulfate neutralization of the anticoagulant effects of heparin.96 The risk of severe adverse reactions to protamine sulfate, such as hypotension or bradycardia, can be minimized by administering the protamine slowly. Patients who have previously received protamine sulfate-containing insulin, have undergone vasectomy, or have known sensitivity to fish are at increased risk to have preformed antibodies against protamine sulfate and to suffer from allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis.97,98 Patients at risk for protamine sulfate allergy can be pretreated with corticosteroids and antihistamines. A number of other substances or devices have been shown to neutralize the anticoagulant effects of unfractionated heparin (UFH). These include hexadimethrine (polybrene),99,100 heparinase (neutralase),101 PF4,102,103 extracorporeal heparin-removal devices,104 and synthetic protamine variants.105 None of these substances or devices are approved for clinical use. 2.2 LMWHs LMWHs are derived from UFH by chemical or enzymatic depolymerization. LMWHs have reduced inhibitory activity against thrombin relative to factor Xa14,106 –109; have a more favorable benefit-to-risk ratio than heparin in animal models,110,111 and when used to treat venous thromboembolism112; and have superior pharmacokinetic properties.113–119 Structure and Mechanism of Action: LMWHs are about one third the molecular weight of UFH. They have a mean molecular weight of 4,000 to 5,000, which corresponds to about 15 saccharide units, and a molecular weight range of 2,000 to 9,000. Table 5 shows the various LMWHs approved for use in Europe, Canada, and the United States. Because they are prepared using different methods of depolymerization, the various LMWHs differ, at least to some extent, in their pharmacokinetic properties and anticoagulant profiles. Therefore, these drugs are not clinically interchangeable. Depolymerization of heparin yields low-molecularweight fragments that exhibit reduced binding to proteins and cells (Table 6). The reduced affinity for proteins and cells explains the anticoagulant, pharmacokinetic, and other biological differences between heparin and LMWH. Thus, compared with heparin, LMWHs have reduced ability to inactivate www.chestjournal.org
Table 5—Methods for Preparation of LMWHs and Danaparoid Agent
Method of Preparation
Dalteparin (Fragmin) Danaparoid sodium (Orgaran)
Nitrous acid depolymerization Prepared from animal gut mucosa; contains heparan sulfate (84%), dermatan sulfate (12%), and chondroitin sulfate (4%) Benzylation followed by alkaline depolymerization Nitrous acid depolymerization
thrombin because the smaller fragments cannot bind simultaneously to AT and thrombin. Reduced binding to plasma proteins other than AT is responsible for the more predictable dose-response relationship of LMWHs.120 Decreased binding to macrophages and endothelial cells explains the longer plasma half-life of LMWH relative to UFH, whereas reduced binding to platelets and PF4 explains the lower incidence of HIT.121,122 Finally, the decreased binding of LMWH to osteoblasts results in less activation of osteoclasts and less bone loss.35,36 Like heparin, LMWHs produce their major anticoagulant effect by activating AT. The interaction with AT is mediated by a unique pentasaccharide sequence found on fewer than one third of LMWH molecules.7,123 Because only pentasaccharide-containing heparin chains composed of at least 18 saccharide units are of sufficient length to bridge AT to thrombin, 50 to 75% of LMWH chains are too short to catalyze thrombin inhibition. However, these chains are capable of promoting factor Xa inactivation by AT because this reaction does not require bridging. Because virtually all molecules of UFH contain at Table 6 —Biological Consequences of Reduced Binding of LMWH to Proteins and Cells Binding Target Thrombin
Biologic Effects Reduced anti-IIa activity relative to anti-Xa activity More predictable anticoagulant response Cleared through renal mechanism Reduced formation of HIT antibodies Reduced activation of osteoclasts
Clinical Consequence Unknown
Coagulation monitoring unnecessary Longer plasma half-life permits once-daily administration Reduced incidence of HIT Lower risk of osteopenia
least 18 saccharide units, heparin has an anti-Xa-toanti-IIa ratio of 1:1. In contrast, commercial LMWHs have anti-Xa-to-anti-IIa ratios between 2:1 and 4:1, depending on their molecular size distribution. At present, there is no evidence that the differences in anti-Xa-to-anti-IIa ratio among the LMWHs influence clinical outcomes, such as recurrent thrombosis or bleeding complications. Numerous randomized clinical trials have shown that LMWHs are safe and effective for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for the treatment of non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. 2.2.2 Pharmacokinetics: LMWHs have pharmacokinetic advantages over heparin113,114,119; after subcutaneous injection, the bioavailability of LMWHs is about 90%, and LMWHs produce a more predictable anticoagulant response than heparin.124 The elimination half-life of LMWHs, which is 3 to 6 h after subcutaneous injection, is dose independent, and anti-Xa levels peak 3 to 5 h after dosing. One limitation of LMWHs is that they are cleared by the kidneys, so their biological half-life is prolonged in patients with renal failure.125,126 2.2.3 Monitoring Antithrombotic Effect: LMWHs typically are administered in fixed or weight-adjusted doses for thromboprophylaxis and in weight-adjusted doses for therapeutic purposes. Laboratory monitoring is not generally necessary, but some authorities127–129 suggest that monitoring be done in obese patients and in patients with renal insufficiency. Monitoring also may be advisable when treatment doses of LMWH are given during pregnancy. If monitoring is required, the anti-Xa level is the recommended test.130 Although some studies131,132 reported that high anti-Xa levels are associated with an increased bleeding risk, several other studies133–135 failed to show a relationship between anti-Xa levels and bleeding. A randomized controlled trial136 comparing monitored and unmonitored dalteparin therapy for treatment of venous thromboembolism showed no benefit of monitoring. Therefore, routine anti-Xa monitoring is not indicated. For treatment of venous thromboembolism, a conservative peak anti-Xa level with twice-daily enoxaparin or nadroparin is 0.6 to 1.0 U/mL.129,130,137,138 The target range for peak anti-Xa levels (measured 4 h after dosing) with once-daily enoxaparin is likely to be ⬎ 1.0 U/mL,130 whereas it is 0.85 U/mL with tinzaparin and 1.3 U/mL and 1.05 U/mL with nadroparin and dalteparin, respectively.138 148S
Recommendation 2.2.3 In patients treated with LMWH, we recommend against routine coagulation monitoring (Grade 1C). In pregnant women treated with therapeutic doses of LMWH, we recommend monitoring of anti-Xa levels (Grade 1C). 2.2.4 Dosing and Monitoring in Special Situations: With enoxaparin, anti-Xa activity is increased to appropriate levels when the drug is administered to obese patients in doses based on total body weight up to 144 kg.139 The same is true for dalteparin140,141 and tinzaparin142 in patients weighing up to 190 and 165 kg, respectively. In a metaanalysis, which included data on 921 patients with a BMI of 30,143 there was no excess in the rate of major bleeding over that observed in nonobese patients who received LMWH in doses adjusted by total body weight. For thromboprophylaxis with fixed-dose enoxaparin and nadroparin, there is a strong negative correlation between total body weight and anti-Xa levels in obese patients.144 –146 Two small prospective trials147,148 have examined this issue in patients undergoing bariatric surgery, with inconclusive findings. The existing data, however, suggest that weightbased prophylactic dosing is preferable to fixed dosing for obese patients. Appropriate dosing of LMWH in patients with severe renal insufficiency is uncertain. Contemporary randomized controlled trials evaluating LMWH efficacy and safety have generally excluded patients with severe renal insufficiency, defined in most studies as a creatinine clearance (CrCl) ⱕ 30 mL/ min. With few exceptions,149 pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that clearance of the anti-Xa effect of LMWH is highly correlated with CrCl.150 This was also observed in a large study151 of patients receiving therapeutic-dose enoxaparin for coronary indications, where a strong linear relationship was reported between CrCl and enoxaparin clearance (R ⫽ 0.85; p ⬍ 0.001). Of particular concern is the potential for accumulation of anti-Xa activity after multiple therapeutic doses. A linear correlation was shown between CrCl and anti-Xa levels (p ⬍ 0.0005) after multiple therapeutic doses of enoxaparin, with significantly increased anti-Xa levels in patients with a CrCl ⬍ 30 mL/min.152 Accumulation after multiple prophylactic doses appears to occur less frequently, but it is still observed. Thus, after multiple prophylactic doses of enoxaparin, anti-Xa clearance was reduced by 39%, and drug exposure (area under the curve of anti-Xa activity vs time) was 35% higher in patients with a CrCl ⬍ 30 mL/min compared with that in patients with a CrCl ⱖ 30 mL/min.153 The data on accumulation with LMWHs other than Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy 8th Ed: ACCP Guidelines
enoxaparin are limited. When used in full therapeutic doses, nadroparin clearance, but not tinzaparin clearance, was shown to be correlated with CrCl (R ⫽ 0.49; p ⬍ 0.002),154 even when the CrCl was as low as 20 mL/min.155 The apparent difference in tinzaparin clearance in patients with severe renal insufficiency may reflect its higher molecular weight relative to other LMWH preparations, which may result in clearance by hepatic rather than renal mechanisms. Decreased LMWH clearance has been associated with increased bleeding risks in patients with severe renal insufficiency. In a recent metaanalysis, Lim et al156 compared the risk of major bleeding and anti-Xa levels in patients receiving LMWH who had severe renal insufficiency (CrCl ⱕ 30 mL/min) with those in patients without renal impairment (CrCl ⬎ 30 mL/min). In 12 studies156 involving 4,971 patients given LMWH, the odds ratio (OR) for major bleeding was 2.25 (95% CI, 1.19 to 4.27) in patients with a CrCl ⱕ 30 mL/min compared with that in those with a CrCl ⬎ 30 mL/min. Use of therapeuticdose enoxaparin was associated with a further increase in major bleeding in patients with a CrCl ⱕ 30 mL/min (8.3% vs 2.4%; OR 3.88; 95% CI, 1.78 to 8.45), but this was not observed when enoxaparin was empirically dose reduced (0.9% vs 1.9%; OR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.09 to 3.78). Based on these data, nondialysis-dependent patients with CrCl ⱕ 30 mL/ min who are treated with standard therapeutic doses of enoxaparin have an increased risk of major bleeding, and empiric dose reduction appears to reduce this risk. No conclusions could be made regarding other LMWHs because of limited data. Increased bleeding also was found in a post-hoc analysis of data from the ESSENCE and TIMI 11B trials,143 where CrCl ⱕ 30 mL/min was associated with an increased risk for major hemorrhage in patients receiving therapeutic doses of enoxaparin (RR ⫽ 6.1; 95% CI, 2.47–14.88; p ⫽ 0.0019). In another study of patients with either venous thromboembolism or acute coronary ischemia treated with therapeutic doses of enoxaparin or tinzaparin,157 a CrCl ⬍ 20 mL/min was associated with an RR of 2.8 (95% CI, 1.0 to 7.8) for bleeding complications. Finally, in a retrospective study of patients receiving multiple doses of enoxaparin,158 patients with renal insufficiency had an RR for any bleeding complication of 2.3 (p ⬍ 0.01) and an RR for major hemorrhage of 15.0 (p ⬍ 0.001). In the setting of severe renal insufficiency where therapeutic anticoagulation is required, use of UFH avoids the problems associated with impaired clearance of LMWH preparations. Although there is no specific CrCl threshold at which the risk for accumulation becomes clinically significant, a CrCl of www.chestjournal.org
about 30 mL/min is a reasonable cutoff value based on the available literature. If LMWH is chosen, anti-Xa monitoring and/or dose reduction should be done to ensure that there is no accumulation. In the case of enoxaparin, dose reduction may be used in patients with CrCl ⬍ 30 mL/min. The recommended treatment dose of enoxaparin for patients with a CrCl ⬍ 30 mL/min who have acute coronary syndromes or venous thromboembolism is 50% of the usual dose (ie, 1 mg/kg once daily). No specific recommendations have been made for other LMWH preparations. When given in prophylactic doses, LMWH has not been shown to increase the risk of bleeding complications, irrespective of the degree of impairment of renal function. Although higher anti-Xa levels were found in patients with renal failure who received repeated once-daily prophylactic doses of enoxaparin, the mean peak anti-Xa level was only 0.6 U/mL, and the trough was ⬍ 0.2 U/mL. No increased bleeding was observed.153 In a prospective cohort study of critically ill patients with a wide range of renal function,159 including some with acute renal failure who required hemodialysis, dalteparin bioaccumulation was not observed despite repeated dosing. The current recommendation for prophylactic dose enoxaparin in patients with a CrCl ⬍ 30 mL/min is 50% of the usual dose (ie, 30 mg once daily). No specific recommendations have been made for other LMWH preparations. Recommendation 2.2.4 In obese patients given LMWH prophylaxis or treatment, we suggest weight-based dosing (Grade 2C). In patients with severe renal insufficiency (CrCl < 30 mL/min) who require therapeutic anticoagulation, we suggest the use of UFH instead of LMWH (Grade 2C). If LMWH is used in patients with severe renal insufficiency (CrCl < 30 mL/min) who require therapeutic anticoagulation, we suggest using 50% of the recommended dose (Grade 2C). 2.2.5 Reversing the Anticoagulant Effects of LMWH: There is no proven method for neutralizing LMWH. Studies in vitro and in animals160 –163 have demonstrated that protamine sulfate neutralizes the anti-IIa activity of LMWH, thereby normalizing the APTT and the thrombin time. However, protamine sulfate neutralizes a variable portion of the anti-Xa activity of LMWH. It is likely that incomplete neutralization of anti-Xa activity reflects the fact that protamine does not bind to LMWH fragments within the LMWH preparations.120 CHEST / 133 / 6 / JUNE, 2008 SUPPLEMENT
The clinical significance of incomplete anti-Xa neutralization of LMWH by protamine sulfate is unclear. In a small case series,161 protamine sulfate failed to correct clinical bleeding associated with LMWH in two of three patients, but there are no human studies that convincingly demonstrate or refute a beneficial effect of protamine sulfate on bleeding associated with the use of LMWH. One animal study164 reported a reduction in bleeding with protamine sulfate in a microvascular bleeding model, despite persistent anti-Xa activity. Another study165 demonstrated incomplete attenuation of bleeding. A recent case report166 described the successful use of recombinant activated factor VII to control bleeding in a postoperative patient with renal failure who was receiving LMWH. In animal studies, synthetic protamine variants have been shown to be highly effective in neutralizing the anticoagulant effects of LMWH, including anti-Xa activity, and appear to be less toxic than protamine sulfate.167–170 Adenosine triphosphate completely reversed clinical bleeding related to LMWH in a rat model.171 These agents are not approved for clinical use. The following approach is recommended in clinical situations where the anticoagulant effect of LMWH needs to be neutralized. If LMWH was given within 8 h, protamine sulfate should be administered in a dose of 1mg per 100 anti-Xa units of LMWH (1 mg enoxaparin equals approximately 100 anti-Xa units). A second dose of 0.5 mg protamine sulfate per 100 anti-Xa units should be administered if bleeding continues. Smaller doses of protamine sulfate can be given if the time since LMWH administration is longer than 8 h. 2.2.6 Nonhemorrhagic Complications: The frequency of HIT is threefold lower with LMWHs than with heparin, which reflects the fact that the interaction of heparin with PF4 is chain-length dependent. Although binding to PF4 is reduced, LMWHs can form complexes with PF4 that are capable of binding HIT antibodies. Consequently, in patients with HIT antibodies, there is cross-reactivity with LMWH (see chapter by Warkentin et al212). The risk of osteoporosis is lower with LMWH than with heparin. Likely, this reflects the lower affinity of LMWH for bone cells. Monreal et al172 compared the effects of heparin and LMWH on bone loss in rats and demonstrated that although both produced bone loss, the osteopenic effect was greater with heparin than with LMWH. In contrast, using different measures of bone loss, Mätzsch et al173 reported that with similar anti-factor Xa activities, the effects of LMWH and UFH on experimental bone loss were similar. Muir et al174 reported that heparin and 150S
LMWH both produced a dose-dependent decrease in cancellous bone volume in rats. However, the effects were greater with UFH than with LMWH. These investigators35 also showed that although both anticoagulants inhibited bone nodule formation and increased alkaline phosphatase in a dose-dependent manner, UFH had a six-fold greater effect than LMWH. Other investigators also reported that LMWH causes significant inhibition of osteoblast growth175 and produces osteopenic changes in rats.176 Three small prospective clinical studies have reported on the effects of prophylactic doses of LMWH on bone density. The first was a cohort study177 in which 16 women receiving enoxaparin (40 mg/d) during pregnancy had serial bone density measurements of the proximal femur. Baseline measurements were taken within 2 weeks of starting therapy and then at 6 to 8 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Patients received enoxaparin for a mean duration of 25 weeks (range, 19 to 32 weeks). Compared with baseline values, there was no significant change in mean bone density at 6 weeks postpartum, and no patient experienced a ⬎ 10% decrease in bone mass. At 6 months postpartum, there was a significant reduction in mean bone density (p ⫽ 0.02), and 2 of the 14 patients evaluated (14%) had a ⬎ 10% decrease. The second study178 was an open randomized trial that included 44 pregnant women with venous thromboembolism. Patients were assigned to either prophylactic doses of LMWH (dalteparin, n ⫽ 21) once daily subcutaneously or UFH (n ⫽ 23) twice daily subcutaneously during pregnancy and the puerperium. Dual radiograph absorptiometry of the lumbosacral spine was performed at 1, 6, 16, and 52 weeks. A healthy untreated control group was included for comparison. Mean bone density of the lumbar spine was significantly lower in the UFH group than in the dalteparin or control groups. Bone density measurements did not differ between the dalteparin and nonrandomized control groups. The third clinical trial179 compared the effects of long-term treatment with LMWH and acenocoumarol on bone mineral density in 86 patients with venous thromboembolism. Treatment was given for 3 to 24 months. At 1 and 2 years of follow-up, the mean decrease in bone density of the femur was 1.8% and 2.6% in patients given acenocoumarol and 3.1% and 4.8% in patients given enoxaparin, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. In summary, both UFH and LMWH preparations have the potential to produce osteopenia, but the risk is greater with UFH. 2.3 Fondaparinux 2.3.1 Discovery of the Natural High-Affinity Pentasaccharide: Building on the discovery of Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy 8th Ed: ACCP Guidelines
Choay et al,8 who isolated heparin fragments with high affinity for AT, Choay et al8 and Thunberg et al180 demonstrated that the minimum heparin fragment necessary for high-affinity binding to AT consisted of a pentasaccharide. Choay et al181,182 then isolated this high-affinity pentasaccharide and demonstrated that it formed an equimolar complex with AT and enhanced AT-mediated inhibition of factor Xa. In 1987, Atha et al183 reported that both the 3-Oand 6-O-sulfated glucosamine residues within the pentasaccharide sequence were critical for its activity. These observations paved the way for the development of fondaparinux. 2.3.2 Pharmacology: A synthetic analog of the AT-binding pentasaccharide found in heparin and LMWH was prepared and its structure modified so as to increase its affinity for AT, thereby increasing its specific activity and half-life. The resulting synthetic pentasaccharide, fondaparinux, has a molecular weight of 1728. Its specific anti-Xa activity is higher than that of LMWH (about 700 U/mg and 100 U/mg, respectively), and its half-life after subcutaneous injection is longer than that of LMWH (17 h and ⬃ 4 h, respectively). The use of LMWH as the reference preparation for expressing the anti-Xa activity of fondaparinux is problematic.184,185 Fondaparinux binds to AT and produces a conformational change at the reactive site of AT that enhances its reactivity with factor Xa.186 AT then forms a covalent complex with factor Xa. Fondaparinux is released from AT and is available to activate additional AT molecules. Because it is too short to bridge AT to thrombin, fondaparinux does not increase the rate of thrombin inhibition by AT. The pharmacokinetic properties and metabolism of fondaparinux have been studied in healthy volunteers.187,188 After subcutaneous injection, fondaparinux is rapidly and completely absorbed. A steady state is reached after the third or fourth once-daily dose, and fondaparinux is excreted unchanged in the urine. The terminal half-life is 17 h in young subjects and 21 h in elderly volunteers. Fondaparinux produces a predictable anticoagulant response and exhibits linear pharmacokinetics when given in subcutaneous doses of 2 to 8 mg or in IV doses ranging from 2 to 20 mg.188 There is minimal nonspecific binding of fondaparinux to plasma proteins other than AT, and most of the compound is bound to AT.189 Based on its excellent bioavailability after subcutaneous injection, lack of variability in anticoagulant response and long half-life, fondaparinux can be administered subcutaneously once daily in fixed doses without laboratory monitoring. Fondaparinux is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency (CrCl ⬍ 30 mL/min). www.chestjournal.org
2.3.3 Dosing and Monitoring: Fondaparinux is given at a fixed dose of 2.5 mg for thromboprophylaxis. For treatment of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, the drug is given at a dose of 7.5 mg for patients with a body weight of 50 to 100 kg; the dose is decreased to 5 mg for patients weighing ⬍ 50 kg and increased to 10 mg for those weighing ⬎ 100 kg. For patients with acute coronary syndromes, a once-daily fondaparinux dose of 2.5 mg is used. Fondaparinux has not been monitored in clinical studies. Therefore, routine coagulation monitoring is not recommended. Some experts recommend a 50% reduction in the fondaparinux dose when the drug is given for thromboprophylaxis in patients with moderately severe renal insufficiency (ie, CrCl ⬍ 50 mL/min). Although coagulation monitoring is not recommended routinely, there may be circumstances when it is useful to determine the anticoagulant activity of fondaparinux. This can be measured using anti-Xa assays. To calculate drug levels, fondaparinux must be used as a reference standard in the assay. The therapeutic anti-Xa range for fondaparinux has not been established; however, when given at the 2.5-mg daily dose, levels of 0.2 to 0.4 g/mL can be expected, whereas levels of 0.5 to 1.5 g/mL are achieved with the 7.5-mg daily dose. Fondaparinux does not bind to protamine sulfate, the antidote for heparin. If uncontrollable bleeding occurs with fondaparinux, recombinant factor VIIa may be effective.190 2.3.4 Nonhemorrhagic Side Effects: Fondaparinux has low affinity for PF4 and does not cross-react with HIT antibodies.191 There have been no reports of HIT with fondaparinux, and this agent has been used successfully to treat HIT patients.192 Heparin and LMWH can cause urticarial skin reactions. Rarely, skin necrosis can occur at injection sites. In these cases, HIT should be suspected. In a single-case report,193 fondaparinux was used successfully in a patient who developed skin reactions to three different LMWH preparations. To date, studies on the effects of fondaparinux on bone metabolism have been limited to in vitro experiments using cultured osteoblasts. In one study, fondaparinux was compared with heparin, dalteparin, or enoxaparin. Osteoblasts exposed to fondaparinux showed significantly higher mitochondrial activity and protein synthesis than unexposed osteoblasts. In contrast, therapeutically relevant concentrations of heparin, dalteparin, or enoxaparin decreased matrix collagen type II content and calcification; fondaparinux had no effect on these measures of osteoblastic activity.194 A second study compared the effects of fondaparinux and dalteparin on human osteoblasts in culture. Dalteparin inhibited osteoblast CHEST / 133 / 6 / JUNE, 2008 SUPPLEMENT
proliferation, protein synthesis, and the decreased levels of osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase. In contrast, fondaparinux had no effect.195 Because of insufficient safety data, fondaparinux is contraindicated in pregnancy, although one pharmacologic study showed that there was no placental transfer of the pentasacccharide.196 Danaparoid Sodium Although it is a mixture of glycosaminoglycans (heparan sulfate, dermatan sulfate, and chondroitin sulfate), danaparoid acts as an anticoagulant primarily by catalyzing the inhibition of factor Xa in an AT-dependent fashion. The drug has low specific anti-Xa activity. Based on anti-Xa levels, danaparoid has a half-life of approximately 25 h. Although danaparoid was shown to be effective for the prevention of venous thrombosis in high-risk patients, it is no longer marketed for this indication. Currently, its use is limited to the management of patients with HIT. Danaparoid is the only agent that has been evaluated for HIT in a randomized clinical trial,213 where it was reported to be significantly better than dextran. High success rates in the treatment of HIT also have been observed in retrospective studies.214 Danaparoid is approved for the treatment of HIT in some countries (eg, the Netherlands, Belgium, New Zealand) but not in the United States. Danaparoid does not prolong the INR, which facilitates monitoring when transitioning HIT patients from danaparoid to vitamin K antagonists. The long half-life of danaparoid is a disadvantage if patients require urgent surgery or invasive procedures. There is no antidote for danaparoid, which is problematic for patients who have serious bleeding. 3.0 Direct Thrombin Inhibitors In contrast to indirect anticoagulants, which require a plasma cofactor to exert their activity, direct thrombin inhibitors have intrinsic activity because they bind to thrombin and block its enzymatic activity. The currently approved direct thrombin inhibitors are hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban. Hirudin A 65-amino acid polypeptide originally isolated from the salivary glands of the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis,197,198 hirudin is now available in recombinant forms. Expressed in yeast, recombinant hirudins differ from native hirudin in that the Tyr residue at position 63 is not sulfated. Two recombinant forms of hirudin, known as lepirudin and desirudin, are currently approved for clinical use in 152S
North America and in Europe, respectively. Lepirudin is licensed for treatment of thrombosis complicating HIT, whereas desirudin is approved in Europe for postoperative thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty. Although there are minor differences in the aminoterminal composition of the two forms of recombinant hirudin, their mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic properties are identical. Both inhibit thrombin in a bivalent fashion. Thus, their globular amino-terminal domains interact with the active site of thrombin, whereas the anionic carboxy-terminal tails bind to exosite 1 on thrombin, the substratebinding site.198 Both lepirudin and desirudin form high-affinity stoichiometric complexes with thrombin that are essentially irreversible. Dosing and Monitoring: The recommended dose of IV lepirudin for HIT is 0.15 mg/kg/h, with or without an initial bolus of 0.4 mg/kg. The anticoagulant effect of lepirudin in this setting is monitored by using the APTT, and the dose is adjusted to achieve a target APTT ratio of 1.5 to 2.5. When given for thromboprophylaxis after elective hip replacement surgery, desirudin is given subcutaneously at a dose of 15 mg twice daily. Routine APTT monitoring is unnecessary with this dose of desirudin. The plasma half-life of the hirudins is 60 min after IV injection and 120 min after subcutaneous injection.199 Hirudin is cleared via the kidneys, and the drug accumulates in patients with renal insufficiency. The dose of hirudin must be reduced when the CrCl is ⬍ 60 mL/min and the drug is contraindicated in patients with renal failure.199 Antibodies against hirudin develop in up to 40% of patients treated with lepirudin. Although most of these antibodies have no clinical impact, some can prolong the plasma half-life of lepirudin, resulting in drug accumulation. In addition, anaphylaxis can occur if patients with antibodies are reexposed to hirudin. Consequently, an alternative anticoagulant should be used in HIT patients who have previously been treated with hirudin. Bivalirudin: A 20-amino acid synthetic polypeptide, bivalirudin is an analog of hirudin.200 The amino-terminal D-Phe-Pro-Arg-Pro sequence, which binds to the active site of thrombin, is connected via four Gly residues to a carboxy-terminal dodecapeptide that interacts with exosite 1 on thrombin.201 Like hirudin, bivalirudin forms a 1:1 stoichiometric complex with thrombin. However, once bound, thrombin cleaves the Pro-Arg bond within the amino terminal of bivalirudin, thereby allowing recovery of thrombin activity.202 Bivalirudin has a plasma half-life of 25 min after IV injection,203 and only 20% is excreted Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy 8th Ed: ACCP Guidelines
via the kidneys.204 Bivalirudin is licensed as an alternative to heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. The currently recommended dose is a bolus of 0.7 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/h for the duration of the procedure. Bivalirudin is licensed as an alternative to heparin in HIT patients (with or without thrombosis) who require percutaneous coronary interventions. The drug also is being explored as an alternative to heparin in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. In contrast to hirudin, bivalirudin is not immunogenic. However, antibodies against hirudin can crossreact with bivalirudin in vitro. The clinical consequences of this cross-reactivity are uncertain. Argatroban: A competitive inhibitor of thrombin, argatroban binds noncovalently to the active site of thrombin to form a reversible complex.205–207 The plasma half-life of argatroban is 45 min. It is metabolized in the liver207 via the cytochrome P450 3A4/5 enzyme system. Consequently, argatroban must be used with caution in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Because it is not renally excreted, however, argatroban is particularly useful in HIT patients with severe renal impairment. Argatroban is licensed for treatment and prevention of HIT-associated thrombosis and for anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary interventions when heparin is contraindicated because of a recent history of HIT. Argatroban is given as a continuous IV infusion at a dose of 2 g/kg/h, and the dose is adjusted to maintain the APTT ratio in the 1.5 to 2.5 range. Recommendation 3.0 In patients who receive either lepirudin or desirudin and have renal insufficiency (CrCl < 60 mL/min but > 30 mL/min), we recommend that the dose be reduced and the drug be monitored using the APTT (Grade 1C). In patients with a CrCl < 30 mL/min, we recommend against the use of lepirudin or desirudin (Grade 1C). In patients who require anticoagulation and have previously received lepirudin or desirudin, we recommend against repeated use of these drugs because of the risk of anaphylaxis (Grade 1C). 3.1 Monitoring of Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Although the APTT is used to monitor therapy with direct thrombin inhibitors, this test is not ideal. The dose response is not linear, and the APTT reaches a plateau with higher doses of the various www.chestjournal.org
drugs. In addition, APTT reagents vary in their sensitivities to direct thrombin inhibitors. The ecarin clotting time yields a more linear dose response, but this test is not widely available and has not been standardized. All of the direct thrombin inhibitors increase the INR, albeit to a variable extent. When given in therapeutic doses, argatroban has the greatest effect on the INR. This phenomenon complicates transitioning from argatroban to vitamin K antagonists. To overcome this problem, the INR can be measured after stopping the argatroban infusion for several hours. Because holding argatroban may expose patients to a risk of thrombosis, another option is to monitor the vitamin K antagonist with a chromogenic factor X assay. In this setting, factor X levels ⬍ 45% have been associated with INR values ⬎ 2 when the effect of argatroban has been eliminated.208 Monitoring factor X levels may be safer than aiming for an INR of 4 or higher when vitamin K antagonists are given in conjunction with argatroban.209,210 Recommendation 3.1 In patients receiving argatroban who are being transitioned to a vitamin K antagonist, we suggest that factor X levels, measured using a chromogenic assay, be used to adjust the dose of the vitamin K antagonist (Grade 2C). 3.2 Reversal of Anticoagulant Effects There are no specific antidotes for direct thrombin inhibitors. Using inhibition of thrombin generation in shed blood as an index of activity, recombinant factor VIIa can reverse the anticoagulant effect of direct thrombin inhibitors in healthy volunteers.211 Although recombinant factor VIIa reduces bleeding induced by direct thrombin inhibitors in animals, the utility of this agent in patients has not been established. Hemodialysis or hemoperfusion can remove bivalirudin or argatroban. Given their short half-lives, however, this is rarely necessary. Dialysis using special dialysis membranes can clear hirudin.
Conlict of Interest Disclosures Dr. Hirsh discloses that he has received partial support for writing two books, one on Fondaparinux and one on lowmolecular-weight heparin. Dr. Bauer discloses that he received consultant fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer Healthcare, Pfizer, Eisai, and BristolMyers Squibb. He is on the speakers bureau for GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi-Aventis, and has assisted the advisory committees of CHEST / 133 / 6 / JUNE, 2008 SUPPLEMENT
Bayer Healthcare and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Bauer is also in a fiduciary position for the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Professor Donati reveals no real or potential conflicts of interest or commitment. Dr. Gould reveals no real or potential conflicts of interest or commitment. Dr. Samama discloses that he has received grant monies from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Pfizer. He has received consultant fees from Pfizer. Dr. Samama has served on the speakers bureau of Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, and has assisted advisory committees of BMS, AstraZeneca, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Mitsubishi. Dr. Weitz discloses that he has received consultant fees from AstraZeneca, The Medicines Company, Schering-Plough, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck AG. He has served on an advisory committee for Eisai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Schering-Plough, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, and SmithKline Beecham.
References 1 McLean J. The thromboplastic action of cephalin. Am J Physiol 1916; 41:250 –257 2 Brinkhous K, Smith H, Warner E, et al. The inhibition of blood clotting: an unidentified substance which acts in conjunction with heparin to prevent the conversion of prothrombin into thrombin. Am J Physiol 1939; 125:683– 687 3 Abildgaard U. Highly purified antithrombin III with heparin cofactor activity prepared by disc electrophoresi. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1968; 21:89 –91 4 Lindahl U, Backstrom G, Hook M, et al. Structure of the antithrombin-binding site of heparin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979; 76:3198 –3202 5 Rosenberg R, Bauer K. The heparin-antithrombin system: a natural anticoagulant mechanism. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1994 6 Rosenberg R, Lam L. Correlation between structure and function of heparin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979; 76:1218 –1222 7 Casu B, Oreste P, Torri G, et al. The structure of heparin oligosaccharide fragments with high anti-(factor Xa) activity containing the minimal antithrombin III-binding sequence. Biochem J 1981; 97:599 – 609 8 Choay J, Lormeau J, Petitou M, et al. Structural studies on a biologically active hexasaccharide obtained from heparin. Ann NY Acad Sci 1981; 370:644 – 649 9 Eriksson B, Bauer K, Lassen M, et al. Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip-fracture surgery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1298 –1304 10 Herbert J, Herault J, Bernat A, et al. Biochemical and pharmacological properties of SANORG 34006, a potent and long-acting synthetic pentasaccharide. Blood 1998; 91: 4197– 4205 11 Turpie A, Bauer K, Eriksson B, et al. Postoperative fondaparinux versus postoperative enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip-replacement surgery: a randomized double-blind trial. Lancet 2002; 359:1721–1726 12 Vuillemenot A, Schiele F, Meneveau N, et al. Efficacy of a synthetic pentasaccharide, a pure factor Xa inhibitor, as an antithrombotic agent: a pilot study in the setting of coronary angioplasty. Thromb Haemost 1999; 81:214 –220 13 Andersson L, Barrowcliffe T, Holmer E, et al. Anticoagulant properties of heparin fractionated by affinity chromatogra154S
14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
phy on matrix-bound antithrombin III and by gel filtration. Thromb Res 1976; 9:575–583 Harenberg J. Pharmacology of low molecular weight heparins. Semin Thromb Hemost 1990; 16:12–18 Johnson E, Mulloy B. The molecular weight range of commercial heparin preparations. Carbohydr Res 1976; 51:119 –127 Lam L, Silbert J, Rosenberg R. Separation of active and inactive forms of heparin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1976; 69:570 –577 Tollefsen D, Majerus D, Blank M. Heparin cofactor II: purification and properties of a heparin-dependent inhibitor of thrombin in human plasma. J Biol Chem 1982; 257:2162– 2169 Weitz J, Young E, Johnston M, et al. Vasoflux, a new anticoagulant with a novel mechanism of action. Circulation 1999; 99:682– 689 Lane D, Denton J, Flynn A, et al. Anticoagulant activities of heparin oligosaccharides and their neutralization by platelet factor 4. Biochem J 1984; 218:725–732 Lindahl U, Thunberg L, Backstrom G, et al. Extension and structural variability of the antithrombin-binding sequence in heparin. J Biol Chem 1984; 259:12368 –12376 Nesheim M. Simple rate law that describes the kinetics of the heparin-catalyzed reaction between antithrombin III and thrombin. J Biol Chem 1983; 258:14708 –14717 Oosta G, Gardner W, Beeler D, et al. Multiple functional domains of the heparin molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981; 78:829 – 833 Beguin S, Lindhout T, Hemker H. The mode of action of heparin in plasma. Thromb Haemost 1988; 60:457– 462 Ofosu F, Hirsh J, Esmon C, et al. Unfractionated heparin inhibits thrombin-catalyzed amplification reactions of coagulation more efficiently than those catalyzed by factor Xa. Biochem J 1989; 257:143–150 Ofosu F, Sie P, Modi G, et al. The inhibition of thrombindependent feedback reactions is critical to the expression of anticoagulant effects of heparin. Biochem J 1987; 243:579 –588 Eika C. Inhibition of thrombin-induced aggregation of human platelets in heparin. Scand J Haematol 1971; 8:216 – 222 Kelton J, Hirsh J. Bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy. Semin Hematol 1980; 17:259 –291 Salzman E, Rosenberg R, Smith M, et al. Effect of heparin and heparin fractions on platelet aggregation. J Clin Invest 1980; 65:64 –73 Heiden D, Mielke C, Rodvien R. Impairment by heparin of primary haemostasis and platelet (14C)5-hydroxytryptamine release. Br J Haematol 1977; 36:427– 436 Blajchman M, Young E, Ofosu F. Effects of unfractionated heparin, dermatan sulfate and low molecular weight heparin on vessel wall permeability in rabbits. Ann NY Acad Sci 1989; 556:245–254 Fernandez F, Nguyen P, Van Ryn J, et al. Hemorrhagic doses of heparin and other glycosaminoglycans induce a platelet defect. Thromb Res 1986; 43:491– 495 Ockelford P, Carter C, Cerskus A, et al. Comparison of the in vivo hemorrhagic and antithrombotic effects of a low antithrombin III affinity heparin fraction. Thromb Res 1982; 27:679 – 690 Castellot J, Favreau L, Karnovsky M, et al. Inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell growth by endothelial cellderived heparin: possible role of a platelet endoglycosidase. J Biol Chem 1982; 257:11256 –11260 Clowes A, Karnovsky M. Suppression by heparin of smooth muscle cell proliferation in injured arteries. Nature 1977; 265:625– 626 Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy 8th Ed: ACCP Guidelines
35 Bhandari M, Hirsh J, Weitz J, et al. The effects of standard and low molecular weight heparin on bone nodule formation in vitro. Thromb Haemost 1998; 80:413– 417 36 Shaughnessy S, Young E, Deschamps P, et al. The effects of low molecular weight and standard heparin on calcium loss from the fetal rat calvaria. Blood 1995; 86:1368 –1373 37 Hull R, Raskob G, Hirsh J, et al. Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1986; 315:1109 –1114 38 Pini M, Pattacini C, Quintavalla R, et al. Subcutaneous vs intravenous heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a randomized clinical trial. Thromb Haemost 1990; 64:222–226 39 Bara L, Billaud E, Gramond G, et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics of low molecular weight heparin (PK 10169) and unfractionated heparin after intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Thromb Res 1985; 39:631– 636 40 Turpie A, Robinson J, Doyle D, et al. Comparison of high-dose with low-dose subcutaneous heparin to prevent left ventricular mural thrombosis in patients with acute transmural anterior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:352–357 41 Hirsh J, van Aken W, Gallus A, et al. Heparin kinetics in venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1976; 53:691– 695 42 Young E, Prins M, Levine M, et al. Heparin binding to plasma proteins: an important mechanism for heparin resistance. Thromb Haemost 1992; 67:639 – 643 43 Barzu T, Molho P, Tobelem G, et al. Binding and endocytosis of heparin by human endothelial cells in culture. Biochim Biophys Acta 1985; 845:196 –203 44 Sobel M, McNeill P, Carlson P, et al. Heparin inhibition of von Willebrand factor-dependent platelet function in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Invest 1991; 87:1787–1793 45 Bjornsson T, Wolfram B, Kitchell B. Heparin kinetics determined by three assay methods. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982; 31:104 –113 46 de Swart C, Nijmeyer B, Roelofs J, et al. Kinetics of intravenously administered heparin in normal humans. Blood 1982; 60:1251–1258 47 Olsson P, Lagergren H, Ek S. The elimination from plasma of intravenous heparin: an experimental study on dogs and humans. Acta Med Scand 1963; 173:619 – 630 48 Mahadoo J, Hiebert L, Jaques L. Vascular sequestration of heparin. Thromb Res 1977; 12:79 –90 49 Friedman Y, Arsenis C. Studies on the heparin sulphamidase activity from rat spleen: intracellular distribution and characterization of the enzyme. Biochem J 1974; 139:699 –708 50 Dawes J, Pepper D. Catabolism of low-dose heparin in man. Thromb Res 1979; 14:845– 860 51 McAllister B, Demis D. Heparin metabolism: isolation and characterization of uroheparin. Nature 1966; 212:293–294 52 Raschke R, Reilly B, Srinivas S, et al. The weight based heparin dosing nomogram versus a standard care nomogram: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119:874 – 881 53 Cruickshank M, Levine M, Hirsh J, et al. A standard heparin nomogram for the management of heparin therapy. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151:333–337 54 Prandoni P, Carnovali M, Marchiori A, et al. Subcutaneous adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin vs fixed-dose lowmolecular-weight heparin in the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:1077–1083 55 Kearon C, Ginsberg J, Julian J, et al. Comparison of fixed-dose weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin and lowmolecular-weight heparin for acute treatment of venous www.chestjournal.org
thromboembolism. JAMA 2006; 296:935–942 56 Antman E, Beasley J, Califf R, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:970 –1062 57 Ryan T, Antman E, Brooks N, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report of the ACC/AHA taskforce on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:890 –911 58 Levine M, Hirsh J, Kelton J. Heparin-induced bleeding. In: Heparin. London, United Kingdom: Edward Arnold, 1989 59 Morabia A. Heparin doses and major bleedings. Lancet 1986; 1:1278 –1279 60 Antman E, the TIMI 9A Investigators. Hirudin in acute myocardial infarction: safety report from the Thrombolysis and Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 9A trial. Circulation 1994; 90:1624 –1630 61 Antman E, the TIMI 9B Investigators. Hirudin in acute myocardial infarction: Thrombolysis and Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 9B trial. Circulation 1996; 94:911–921 62 GUSTO IIA Investigators. Randomized trial of intravenous heparin versus recombinant hirudin for acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 1994; 90:1631–1637 63 GUSTO IIB Investigators. A comparison of recombinant hirudin with heparin for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 1996; 355:775–782 64 EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in highrisk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:956 –961 65 EPILOG Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994; 336: 1689 –1696 66 Landefeld S, Cook F, Flatley M, et al. Identification and preliminary validation of predictors of major bleeding in hospitalized patients starting anticoagulant therapy. Am J Med 1987; 82:703–713 67 Raschke R, Gollihare B, Peirce J. The effectiveness of implementing the weight-based heparin nomogram as a practice guideline. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:1645–1649 68 Basu D, Gallus A, Hirsh J, et al. A prospective study of the value of monitoring heparin treatment with the activated partial thromboplastin time. N Engl J Med 1972; 287:324 – 327 69 Bain B, Forster T, Sleigh B. Heparin and the activated partial thromboplastin time: a difference between the invitro and in-vivo effects and implications for the therapeutic range. Am J Clin Pathol 1980; 74:668 – 673 70 Baker B, Adelman M, Smith P, et al. Inability of the activated partial thromboplastin time to predict heparin levels. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:2475–2479 71 Bates S, Weitz J, Johnston M, et al. Use of a fixed activated partial thromboplastin time ratio to establish a therapeutic range for unfractionated heparin. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161:385–391 72 Brandt J, Triplett D. Laboratory monitoring of heparin: effect of reagents and instruments on the activated partial thromboplastin time. Am J Clin Pathol 1981; 76:530 –537 73 Brill-Edwards P, Ginsberg J, Johnston M, et al. Establishing a therapeutic range for heparin therapy. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119:104 –109 74 Kitchen S, Jennings I, Woods T, et al. Wide variability in the sensitivity of APTT reagents for monitoring of heparin dosage. J Clin Pathol 1996; 49:10 –14 75 Olson J, Arkin C, Brandt J, et al. College of American CHEST / 133 / 6 / JUNE, 2008 SUPPLEMENT
Pathologists Conference XXXI on Laboratory Monitoring of Anticoagulant Therapy: laboratory monitoring of unfractionated heparin therapy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998; 122:782– 798 Rosborough T. Comparing different lots of activated partial thromboplastin time reagent. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 110: 173–177 Shojania A, Tetreault J, Turnbull G. The variations between heparin sensitivity of different lots of activated partial thromboplastin time reagent produced by the same manufacturer. J Clin Pathol 1988; 89:19 –23 Zanke B, Shojania A. Comparison of two APTT methods of monitoring heparin therapy. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 93:684 – 689 Koerber J, Smythe M, Begle R, et al. Correlation of activated clotting time and activated partial thromboplastin time to plasma heparin concentration. Pharmacotherapy 1999; 19:922–931 Manzato F, Mengoni A, Grilenzoni A, et al. Evaluation of the activated partial thromboplastin time sensitivity to heparin using five commercial reagents: implications for therapeutic monitoring. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998; 36:975–980 Raschke R, Guidry J, Foley M. Apparent heparin resistance from elevated factor VIII during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:804 – 806 Rosborough T. Comparison of anti-factor Xa heparin activity and activated partial thromboplastin time in 2,773 plasma samples from unfractionated heparin-treated patients. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 108:662– 668 Volles D, Ancell C, Micheal K, et al. Establishing an institution-specific therapeutic range for heparin. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1998; 55:2002–2006 Raschke R, Hirsh J, Guidry J. The effect of sub-optimal monitoring of unfractionated heparin on the interpretation of comparative studies with low molecular weight heparin. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:720 –723 van den Besselaar A, Meeuwisse-Braun J, Bertina R. Monitoring heparin therapy: relationships between the activated partial thromboplastin time and heparin assays based on ex-vivo heparin samples. Thromb Haemost 1990; 63:16 –23 Anand S, Brimble S, Ginsberg J. Management of iliofemoral thrombosis in a pregnant patient with heparin resistance. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:815– 816 Hirsh J, Salzman E, Marder V. Treatment of venous thromboembolism. 3rd ed. Philadelpheia, PA: Lippincott, 1994 Levine M, Hirsh J, Gent M, et al. A randomized trial comparing activated thromboplastin time with heparin assay in patients with acute venous thromboembolism requiring large daily doses of heparin. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:49 –56 Whitfield L, Lele A, Levy G. Effect of pregnancy on the relationship between concentration and anticoagulant action of heparin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 34:23–28 Edson J, Krivit W, White J. Kaolin partial thromboplastin time: high levels of procoagulants producing short clotting times or masking deficiencies of other procoagulants or low concentrations of anticoagulants. J Lab Clin Med 1967; 70:463– 470 Becker R, Corrao J, Bovill E, et al. Intravenous nitroglycerininduced heparin resistance: a qualitative antithrombin III abnormality. Am Heart J 1990; 119:1254 –1261 Fisher A, Bailey C, Shannon C, et al. Heparin resistance after aprotinin. Lancet 1992; 340:1230 –1231 Raschke R, Guidry J, Laufer N. Heparin-nitroglycerin interaction. Am Heart J 1991; 121:1849 Hirsh J. Heparin. N Engl J Med 324:1565–1574 Young E, Wells P, Holloway S, et al. Ex-vivo and in-vitro evidence that low molecular weight heparins exhibit less
99 100 101
102 103 104
107 108 109
113 114 115
binding to plasma proteins than unfractionated heparin. Thromb Haemost 1994; 71:300 –304 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Protamine sulfate: antiheparin agents: Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 1999 Caplan S, Berkman E. Protamine sulfate and fish allergy. N Engl J Med 1976; 295:172 Stewart W, McSweeney S, Kellett M, et al. Increased risk of severe protamine reactions in NPH insulin-dependent diabetics undergoing cardiac catheterization. Circulation 1984; 70:788 –792 Cooney A, Mann T. Recent experiences with hexadimethrine for neutralizing heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 1999; 27:298 –300 Kikura M, Lee M, Levy J. Heparin neutralization with methylene blue, hexadimethrine, or vancomycin after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:223–227 Despotis G, Summerfield A, Joist J, et al. In vitro reversal of heparin effect with heparinase: evaluation with whole blood prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg 1994; 79:670 – 674 D’Ambra M. Restoration of the normal coagulation process: advances in therapies to antagonize heparin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1996; 27(suppl):S58 –S62 Dehmer G, Fisher M, Tate D, et al. Reversal of heparin anticoagulation by recombinant platelet factor 4 in humans. Circulation 1995; 91:2188 –2194 Tao W, Deyo D, Brunston RJ, et al. Extracorporeal heparin adsorption following cardiopulmonary bypass with a heparin removal device: an alternative to protamine. Crit Care Med 1998; 26:1096 –1102 Hulin M, Wakefield T, Andrews P, et al. A novel protamine variant reversal of heparin anticoagulation in human blood in vitro. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26:1043–1048 Holmer E, Kurachi K, Soderstrom G. The molecular-weight dependence of the rate-enhancing effect of heparin on the inhibition of thrombin, factor Xa, factor IXa, factor XIa, factor XIIa and kallikrein by antithrombin. Biochem J 1981; 193:395– 400 Holmer E, Soderberg K, Bergqvist D, et al. Heparin and its low molecular weight derivatives: anticoagulant and antithrombotic properties. Haemostasis 1986; 16:1–7 Johnson E, Kirkwood T, Stirling Y, et al. Four heparin preparations: anti-Xa potentiating effect of heparin after subcutaneous injection. Thromb Haemost 1976; 35:586 –591 Jordan R, Oosta G, Gardner W, et al. The kinetics of hemostatic enzyme-antithrombin interactions in the presence of low molecular weight heparin. J Biol Chem 1980; 255:10081–10090 Bergqvist D, Nilsson B, Hedner U, et al. The effects of heparin fragments of different molecular weight in experimental thrombosis and haemostasis. Thromb Res 1985; 38:589 – 601 Carter C, Kelton J, Hirsh J, et al. The relationship between the hemorrhagic and antithrombotic properties of low molecular weight heparins in rabbits. Blood 1982; 59:1239 – 1245 van Dongen C, van den Belt A, Prins M, et al. Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins versus adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 18:DC01100 Bara L, Samama M. Pharmacokinetics of low molecular weight heparins. Acta Chir Scand 1988; 543:65–72 Bradbrook I, Magnani H, Moelker H, et al. ORG 10172: a low molecular weight heparinoid anticoagulant with a long half life in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 23:667– 675 Bratt G, Tornebohm E, Widlund L, et al. Low molecular Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy 8th Ed: ACCP Guidelines
weight heparin (KABI 2165, FRAGMIN): pharmacokinetics after intravenous and subcutaneous administration in human volunteers. Thromb Res 1986; 42:613– 620 Briant L, Caranobe C, Saivin S, et al. Unfractionated heparin and CY216: pharmacokinetics and bioavailabilities of the anti-factor Xa and IIa; effects of intravenous and subcutaneous injection in rabbits. Thromb Haemost 1989; 61:348 –353 Frydman A, Bara L, Leroux Y, et al. The antithrombotic activity and pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, in man given single subcutaneous doses of 20 up to 80 mg. J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 28:609 – 618 Ma¨tzsch T, Bergqvist D, Hedner U, et al. Effect of an enzymatically depolymerized heparin as compared with conventional heparin in healthy volunteers. Thromb Haemost 1987; 57:97–101 Weitz J. Low-molecular-weight heparins. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:688 – 698 Hirsh J, Levine M. Low molecular weight heparin. Blood 1992; 79:1–17 Hirsh J, Weitz JI. New antithrombotic agents. Lancet 1999; 353:1431–1436 Warkentin T, Levine M, Hirsh J, et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecularweight heparin or unfractionated heparin. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1330 –1335 Choay J, Petitou M, Lormeau J, et al. Structure-activity relationship in heparin: a synthetic pentasaccharide with high affinity for antithrombin and eliciting high anti-factor Xa activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1983; 116:492– 499 Handeland G, Abidgaard G, Holm U, et al. Dose adjusted heparin treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a comparison of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 39:107–112 Boneu B, Caranobe C, Cadroy Y, et al. Pharmacokinetic studies of standard UFH, and low molecular weight heparins in the rabbit. Semin Thromb Hemost 1988; 14:18 –27 Palm M, Mattsson C. Pharmacokinetics of heparin and low molecular weight heparin fragment (Fragmin) in rabbits with impaired renal or metabolic clearance. Thromb Res 1985; 40:129 –133 Abbate R, Gori A, Farsi A, et al. Monitoring of lowmolecular-weight heparins. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:33L–36L Kessler C. Low molecular weight heparins: practical considerations. Semin Hematol 1997; 34:35– 42 Samama M. Contemporary laboratory monitoring of low molecular weight heparins. Clin Lab Med 1995; 15:119 –123 Laposata M, Green K, Elizabeth M, et al. College of American Pathologists Conference XXXI on Laboratory Monitoring of Anticoagulant Therapy: the clinical use and laboratory monitoring of low-molecular-weight heparin, danaparoid, hirudin and related compounds, and argatroban. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998; 122:799 – 807 Levine M, Planes A, Hirsh J, et al. The relationship between antifactor Xa level and clinical outcome in patients receiving enoxaparin low molecular weight heparin to prevent deep vein thrombosis after hip replacement. Thromb Haemost 1989; 62:940 –944 Nieuwenhuis H, Albada J, Banga J, et al. Identification of risk factors for bleeding during treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with heparin or low molecular weight heparin. Blood 1991; 78:2337–2343 Bara L, Leizorovicz A, Picolet H, et al. Correlation between anti-Xa and occurrence of thrombosis and haemorrhage in postsurgical patients treated with either Logiparin or unfractionated heparin. Thromb Res 1986; 56:202–206
134 Prandoni P, Lensing A, Buller H, et al. Comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin with intravenous standard heparin in proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1992; 339:441– 445 135 Walenga J, Hoppensteadt D, Fareed J. Laboratory monitoring of the clinical effects of low molecular weight heparins. Thromb Res 1991; 14(suppl):49 – 62 136 Alhenc-Gelas M, Le Guernic J, Vitoux J, et al. Adjusted versus fixed doses of the low-molecular weight heparin Fragmin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1994; 71:698 –702 137 Boneu B. Low molecular weight heparin therapy: is monitoring needed. Thromb Haemost 1994; 72:330 –334 138 Boneu B, deMoerloose P. How and when to monitor a patient treated with low molecular weight heparin. Semin Thromb Hemost 2001; 27:519 –522 139 Sanderink G, Liboux A, Jariwala N, et al. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of enoxaparin in obese volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 72:308 –318 140 Smith J, Canton E. Weight-based administration of dalteparin in obese patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003; 60:683– 687 141 Wilson S, Wilbur K, Burton E, et al. Effect of patient weight on the anticoagulant response to adjusted therapeutic dosage of low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Haemostasis 2001; 31:42– 48 142 Hainer J, Barrett J, Assaid C, et al. Dosing in heavy-weight/ obese patients with the LMWH tinzaparin: a pharmacodynamic study. Thromb Haemost 2002; 87:817– 823 143 Spinler S, Inverso S, Cohen M, et al. Safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin in patients who are obese and patients with severe renal impairment: analysis from the ESSENCE and TIMI 11B studies. Am Heart J 2003; 146:33– 41 144 Frederiksen S, Hedenbro J, Norgren L. Enoxaparin effect depends on body-weight and current doses may be inadequate in obese patients. Br J Surg 2003; 90:547–548 145 Heizmann M, Baerlocher G, Steinmann F, et al. Anti-Xa activity in obese patients after double standard dose of nadroparin for prophylaxis. Thromb Res 2002; 106:179 –181 146 Samama M, Verhill C, Carchy L. Relation between weight, obesity, and frequency of deep venous thrombosis after enoxaparin in orthopedic surgery. Thromb Haemost 1995; 73:977 147 Kalfarentzos F, Stavropoulou F, Yarmenitis S, et al. Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism using two different doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) in bariatric surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Obes Surg 2001; 11:670 – 676 148 Scholten D, Hoedema R, Scholten S. A comparison of two different prophylactic dose regimens of low molecular weight heparin in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2002; 12: 19 –24 149 Brophy D, Wazny L, Behr T, et al. The pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous enoxaparin in end-stage renal disease. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21:169 –174 150 Goudable C, Saivin S, Houin G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a low molecular weight heparin (fraxiparin) in various stages of chronic renal failure. Nephron 1991; 59:543–545 151 Becker R, Spencer F, Gibson M, et al. Influence of patient characteristics and renal function on factor Xa inhibition pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after enoxaparin administration in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2002; 143:753–759 152 Chow S, Zammit K, West K, et al. Correlation of antifactor Xa concentrations with renal function in patients on enoxaparin. J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 43:586 –590 CHEST / 133 / 6 / JUNE, 2008 SUPPLEMENT
153 Sanderink G, Guimart C, Ozoux M-L, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the prophylactic dose of enoxaparin once daily over 4 days in patients with renal impairment. Thromb Res 2002; 105:225–231 154 Mismetti P, Laporte-Simitsidis S, Navarro C, et al. Aging and venous thromboembolism influence the pharmacodynamics of the anti-factor Xa and anti-thrombin activities of a low molecular weight heparin (nadroparin). Thromb Haemost 1989; 79:1162–1165 155 Siguret V, Pautas E, Fevrier M, et al. Elderly patients treated with tinzaparin administered once daily (175 anti-Xa IU/kg): anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities over 10 days. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84:800 – 804 156 Lim W, Dentali F, Eikelboom W, et al. Meta-analysis: low-molecular-weight heparin and bleeding in patients with severe renal insufficiency. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144:673– 684 157 Cestac P, Bagheri H, Lapeyre-Mestre M, et al. Utilisation and safety of low molecular weight heparins: prospective observational study in medical inpatients. Drug Saf 2003; 26:197–207 158 Gerlach A, Pickworth K, Seth S, et al. Enoxaparin and bleeding complications: a review in patients with and without renal insufficiency. Pharmacotherapy 2000; 20:771–775 159 Rabbat C, Cook D, Crowther M, et al. Dalteparin thromboprophylaxis for critically ill medical-surgical patients with renal insufficiency. J Crit Care 2005; 20:357–363 160 Lindblad B, Borgstrom A, Wakefield T, et al. Protamine reversal of anticoagulation achieved with a low molecular weight heparin: the effects on eicosanoids, clotting and complement factors. Thromb Res 1987; 48:31– 40 161 Massonnet-Castel S, Pelissier E, Bara L, et al. Partial reversal of low molecular weight heparin (PK 10169) anti-Xa activity by protamine sulfate: in vitro and in vivo study during cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation. Haemostasis 1986; 16:139 –146 162 Racanelli A, Fareed J, Walenga J, et al. Biochemical and pharmacologic studies on the protamine interactions with heparin, its fractions and fragments. Semin Thromb Hemost 1985; 11:176 –189 163 Woltz M, Weltermann A, Nieszpaur-Los M, et al. Studies on the neutralizing effects of protamine on unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin (Fragmin) at the site of activation of the coagulation system in man. Thromb Haemost 1995; 73:439 – 443 164 van Ryn-McKenna J, Cai L, Ofosu F, et al. Neutralization of enoxaparin-induced bleeding by protamine sulfate. Thromb Haemost 1990; 63:271–274 165 Bang C, Berstad A, Talstad I. Incomplete reversal of enoxaparin-induced bleeding by protamine sulfate. Haemostasis 1991; 21:155–160 166 Ng H, Koh L, Lee L. Successful control of postsurgical bleeding by recombinant factor VIIa in a renal failure patient given low molecular weight heparin and aspirin. Ann Hematol 2003; 82:257–258 167 Byun Y, Singh V, Yang V. Low molecular weight protamine: a potential nontoxic heparin antagonist. Thromb Res 1999; 94:53– 61 168 Hulin M, Wakefield T, Andrews P, et al. Comparison of the hemodynamic and hematologic toxicity of a protamine variant after reversal of low-molecular-weight heparin anticoagulation in a canine model. Lab Anim Sci 1997; 47:153–160 169 Wakefield T, Andrews P, Wrobleski S, et al. Effective and less toxic reversal of low-molecular weight heparin anticoagulation by a designer variant of protamine. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21:839 – 850 170 Wakefield T, Andrews P, Wrobleski S, et al. A [⫹ 18RGD] 158S
176 177 178
180 181 182
protamine variant for nontoxic and effective reversal of conventional heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin anticoagulation. J Surg Res 1996; 63:280 –286 Dietrich C, Shinjo S, Fabio A, et al. Structural features and bleeding activity of commercial low molecular weight heparins: neutralization by ATP and protamine. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999; 25:43–50 Monreal M, Vinas L, Monreal L, et al. Heparin-related osteoporosis in rats: a comparative study between unfractioned heparin and a low-molecular-weight heparin. Haemostasis 1990; 20:204 –207 Ma¨tzsch T, Bergqvist D, Hedner U, et al. Effects of low molecular weight heparin and unfragmented heparin on induction of osteoporosis in rats. Thromb Haemost 1990; 28:505–509 Muir J, Hirsh J, Weitz J, et al. A histomorphometric comparison of the effects of heparin and low-molecularweight heparin on cancellous bone in rats. Blood 1997; 89:3236 –3242 Kock H, Handschin A. Osteoblast growth inhibition by unfractionated heparin and by low molecular weight heparins: an in-vitro investigation. Clin Appl Thromb Haemost 2002; 8:251–255 Folwarczna J, Janiec W, Gawor M, et al. Effects of enoxaparin on histomorphometric parameters of bones in rats. Pol J Pharmacol 2004; 56:451– 457 Casele H, Laifer S. Prospective evaluation of bone density in pregnant women receiving the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin sodium. J Matern Fetal Med 2000; 9:122–125 Pettila V, Leinonen P, Markkola A, et al. Postpartum bone mineral density in women treated for thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin or LMW heparin. Thromb Haemost 2002; 87:182–186 Wawrzynska L, Tomkowski W, Przedlacki J, et al. Changes in bone density during long-term administration of lowmolecular-weight heparins or acenocoumarol for secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2003; 33:64 – 67 Thunberg L, Ba¨ckstro¨m G, Lindahl U. Further characterization of the antithrombin-binding sequence in heparin. Carbohydr Res 1982; 100:393– 410 Choay J. Biologic studies on chemically synthesized pentasaccharide and tetrasaccharide fragments. Semin Thromb Hemost 1985; 11:81– 85 Choay J, Petitou M, Lormeau J, et al. Structure-activity relationship in heparin: a synthetic pentasaccharide with high affinity for antithrombin III and eliciting high antifactor Xa activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1983; 31:116:493– 499 Atha D, Lormeau J, Petitou M, et al. Contribution of 3-Oand 6-O-sulfated glucosamine residues in the heparininduced conformational change in antithrombin III. Biochemistry 1987; 6:26:6454 – 6461 Depasse F, Gilbert M, Goret V, et al. Anti-Xa monitoring: inter-assay variability. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84:1122– 1123 Kitchen S, Iampietro R, Woolley A, et al. Anti-Xa monitoring during treatment with low molecular weight heparin or denaparoid: inter-assay variability. Thromb Haemost 1999; 82:1289 –1293 Boneu B, Necciari J, Cariou R, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of the natural pentasaccharide (SR90107/ ORG31540) with high affinity to antithrombin III in man. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74:1468 –1473 Donat F, Duret J, Santoni A, et al. The pharmacokinetics of fondaparinux sodium in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41:1–9 Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy 8th Ed: ACCP Guidelines
188 Lieu C, Shi J, Donat F, et al. Fondaparinux sodium is not metabolised in mammalian liver fractions and does not inhibit cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of concomitant drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41:19 –26 189 Paolucci F, Clavies M, Donat F, et al. Fondaparinux sodium mechanism of action: identification of specific binding to purified and human plasma-derived proteins. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41:11–18 190 Bijsterveld N, Moons A, Boekholdt S, et al. Ability of recombinant factor VIIa to reverse the anticoauglant effect of the pentasaccharide fondaparinux in healthy volunteers. Circulation 2002; 106:2550 –2554 191 Savi P, Chong B, Greinacher A, et al. Effect of fondaparinux on platelet activation in the presence of heparin-dependent antibodies: a blinded comparative multicenter study with unfractionated heparin. Blood 2005; 105:139 –144 192 Kuo K, Kovacs M. Fondaparinux: a potential new therapy for HIT. Hematology 2005; 10:271–275 193 Parody R, Oliver A, Souto J, et al. Fondaparinux (ARIXTRA) as an alternative anti-thrombotic prophylaxis when there is hypersensitivity to low molecular weight and unfractionated heparins. Haematologica 2003; 88:ECR32 194 Matziolis G, Perka C, Disch A, et al. Effects of fondaparinux compared with dalteparin, enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin on human osteoblasts. Calcif Tissue Int 2003; 73:370 –379 195 Handschin A, Trentz O, Hoerstrup S, et al. Effect of low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) and fondaparinux (Arixtra) on human osteoblasts in vitro. Br J Surg 2005; 92:177–183 196 Lagrange F, Vergnes C, Brun J, et al. Absence of placental transfer of pentasaccharide (Fondaparinux, Arixtra) in the dually perfused human cotyledon in vitro. Thromb Haemost 2002; 87:831– 835 197 Toschi V, Lettino M, Gallo R, et al. Biochemistry and biology of hirudin. Coron Artery Dis 1996; 7:420 – 428 198 Wallis R. Hirudins: from leeches to man. Semin Thromb Hemost 1996; 22:185–196 199 Lefevre G, Duval M, Gauron S, et al. Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desirudin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997; 62:50 –59 200 Maraganore J, Bourdon P, Jablonski J, et al. Design and characterization of hirulogs: a novel class of bivalent peptide inhibitors of thrombin. J Clin Invest 1990; 29: 7095–7101 201 Skrzypczak-Jankun E, Carperos V, Ravichandran K, et al.
Structure of the hirugen and hirulog 1 complexes of alphathrombin. J Mol Biol 1991; 221:1379 –1393 Witting J, Bourdon P, Maraganore J, et al. Hirulog-1 and -B2 thrombin specificity. Biochem J 1992; 287:663– 664 Fox I, Dawson A, Loynds P, et al. Anticoagulant activity of Hirulog, a direct thrombin inhibitor, in humans. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69:157–163 Robson R. The use of bivalirudin in patients with renal impairment. J Invasive Cardiol 2000; 12:33F–36F Banner D, Hadvary P. Inhibitor binding to thrombin: x-ray crystallographic studies. Adv Exp Med Biol 1993; 340:27–33 Hursting M, Alford K, Becker J, et al. Novastan (brand of argatroban): a small-molecule, direct thrombin inhibitor. Semin Thromb Hemost 1997; 23:504 –516 Swan S, Hursting M. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of argatroban: effects of age, gender, and hepatic or renal dysfunction. Pharmacotherapy 2000; 20:318 –329 Alipno P, Demirjian Z, van Cott E, et al. Use of chromogenic factor X assay to predict the international normalized ratio in patients transitioning from argatroban to warfarion. Pharmacotherapy 2005; 25:157–164 Bartholomew J. Transition to an oral anticoagulant in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Chest 2005; 127:275–345 Hurstings M, Lewis B, Macfarlane D. Transitioning from argatroban to warfarin therapy in patients with heparininduced thrombocytopenia. Clin Appl Thromb Haemost 2005; 11:279 –287 Sorensen B, Ingerslev J. A direct thrombin inhibitor studied by dynamic whole blood clot formation: haemostatic response to ex-vivo addition of recombinant factor VIIa or activated prothrombin complex concentrate. Thromb Haemost 2006; 96:446 – 453 Warkentin TE, Greinacher A, Koster A, et al. Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). 2008; 133(suppl):340S–380S Chong BH. Low molecular weight heparinoid and heparininduced thrombocytopenia [abstract]. Aust N Z J Med 1996; 26:331 Ortel TL, Chong BH. New treatment options for heparininduced thrombocytopenia. Semin Hematol 1998; 35(suppl): 26 –34
Parenteral Anticoagulants: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Jack Hirsh, Kenneth A. Bauer, Maria B. Donati, Michael Gould, Meyer M. Samama and Jeffrey I. Weitz Chest 2008;133;141-159 DOI 10.1378/chest.08-0689 This information is current as of July 29, 2008 Updated Information & Services
Updated information and services, including high-resolution figures, can be found at: http://chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/133/6_suppl/141S
This article cites 208 articles, 55 of which you can access for free at: http://chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/133/6_suppl/141S# BIBL
Permissions & Licensing
Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at: http://chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml
Information about ordering reprints can be found online: http://chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml
Email alerting service
Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article sign up in the box at the top right corner of the online article.
Images in PowerPoint format Figures that appear in CHEST articles can be downloaded for teaching purposes in PowerPoint slide format. See any online article figure for directions.