Introduction. An extensive epizootic/epidemic of Rift Valley fever (RVF) occurred in Egypt during 1977-78 (1,2), with a recurrence in Aswan Governorate, Upper.
weighted images (TR/TE, 460/14 ms) revealed unusual leptomeningeal enhancement in the .... The di- agnosis of NB depends mostly on high clinical suspicion in endemic coun- tries. ... pla acuta insorta dopo un'infezione da. Brucella abortus ...
Sep 24, 1982 - disseminated gonococcal infection, one Bartholinitis, three epididymitis, and one a rectal abcess. Patients without gonorrhoea. This included ...
Dr. Sam Sheppard was accused of beating his wife to death. - The show âThe Fugitiveâ was based on his life. He said he was asleep in the living room when his wife was attacked and the intruder knocked him unconscious. - It looked bad for him sinc
Objective: Isolation of B. melitensis and B. abortus from brucellosis patients by ... diagnosis of human brucellosis. ... Middle East, India, and Central and South.
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Variable Abattoir Conditions Affect Salmonella enterica. Prevalence and Meat Quality in Swine and Pork. H.S. HURD,1 J.K. GAILEY,2 J.D. ...
and S. HERR, Veterinary Research Institute, Onderstepoort 0 11 0. ABSTRACT. PEFANIS, S. M., GUMMOW, B., PIETERSON, P. M., WILLIAMSON, CATHERINE ...
ABSTRACT. The present study was envisaged to record the seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle and buffaloes in Chhattisgarh, India by employing the three ...
Nov 24, 2010 - Infection with Brucella in animals leads to ... replicate within the host cells. Virulent ... macrophages is the basis for establishing and maintaining chronic infections ... potential of B. neotomae in any host species. Though not ...
Feb 11, 2015 - chronic infection in these hosts, the brucellae must survive and replicate within host ... and ultimately establish a replicative niche in these cells.
Sep 30, 2015 - hierarchical cluster analysis based on 'single link', which is closely ... Conference 2013 on Risk analysis in the Mediterranean Basin, Risk ...
Mar 5, 2012 - nuclease-free water and equilibrated in binding buffer. ... strand synthesis was performed by adding 91 Ñl nuclease-free ...... Chandra D, Srivastava BS, Srivastava R (2011) Downregulation of ... Infect Immun 69: 5911â5913.
Mar 3, 2016 - Raw Milk and Dairy Product by Real Time PCR Technique. Yaran Majid 1 .... Veterinary sanitation has an important role in the fight against ...
Oct 22, 2017 - paper. Plasma containing haemolysins agglutinates the test cells because of the anticomplementary nature of the citrate and the bromelin.
Detection of specific antibody has a temporal but not a causal association. â¢ Positive or negative predictive value of result depends on the clinical picture and the.
NRAMP1 3 Untranslated Region Polymorphisms Are Not Associated with Natural Resistance to Brucella abortus in Cattle. Tatiane A. PaixaËo,1 Fernando P. Poester,2 Alcina V. Carvalho Neta,1 AÂ´lan M. Borges,1. Andrey P. Lage,2 and Renato L. Santos1*. De
Jul 25, 2008 - dsRNAs to be screen introduced no bias in the functions of the targeted genes in ... and the infection index was determined. Data represent the ...... 1% ddH2O (V/V);. DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide, 1% (V/V); MT: Methanol, 1% (V/.
May 8, 1987 - http://heart.bmj.com/. Downloaded from ... Embolic episodes. Coronary. CVA ... 280. Jeroudi, Halim, Harder, Al-Siba'i, Ziady, Mercer group.bmj.com ... brucellosis in England over a period of 43 years13;. Spink reported four ...
The use of serological tests to detect Trichinella infection in domestic and ... infected rodent muscle, frozen sections of free muscle larvae or formalin ... Competitive inhibition assay (CIA) and IETB (Dupouy-Camet et al., 1988; Ivanoska et al.,.
May 11, 2017 - tested. In order to exclude atypical infection and neoplasia, the right groin was explored with an excisional lymph node biopsy. Two days post- operatively, the patient developed a wound haematoma requiring drainage. There was no demon
Department of Microbiology, Seth G.SMC and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India. Abstract Congenital .... manual of tests for syphilis, Washington, DC: American ... Paniker's Text Book of Microbiology, University Press, 9th edition.
ABSTRACT. RIBEIRO, L. M. M. & HERR, S., 1990. The use of filter paper discs impregnated with thionin acetate, basic fuchsin and thionin blue in the ...
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008;20(3)
BRUCELLA SEROLOGY IN ABATTOIR WORKERS Fatima Mukhtar, Farkhanda Kokab* Department of Community Medicine, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, *Institute of Public Health Lahore, Pakistan
Background: Brucellosis is an occupational hazard with those particularly at risk either living in close proximity with animals or handling them. It is a public health problem in developing countries with adverse health implications both for animals and human beings as well as economic implications for individuals and communities. The Objectives were to estimate the seroprevalence of brucellosis among abattoir workers of Lahore District and to determine the association of brucellosis with nature of job of the workers. Methods: Data was collected in April 2008. It was a cross-sectional study in which four main slaughterhouses in Lahore were included. The slaughterhouse workers were divided into seven strata based on their nature of job: meat sellers, slaughterers, animal keepers, drivers, cleaners, loaders and vets/paravets. A total of 360 such workers were selected using stratified random sampling technique. Sampling frames for different strata were prepared and from each frame, proportionate numbers, were selected through simple random method using random number tables. Data was obtained using a questionnaire. Additionally blood samples were collected and analyzed for anti-Brucella Immunoglobulin G (IgG) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. Results: The seroprevalence of anti-Brucella IgG was found to be 21.7%. A statistically significant difference was observed between the immune status of the respondents and their nature of job (p=0.005), age groups (p=0.013), and duration of job (p=0.003). Conclusion: The disease is an important public health problem in Pakistan. The disease can be prevented in the slaughterhouse workers through the use of personal protective devices. Public health authorities should educate the general public regarding prevention of the disease with specific emphasis on people working in slaughterhouses. Keywords: Abattoir workers, slaughterhouse, Brucella IgG, brucellosis, seroprevalence
INTRODUCTION Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease of wild and domestic animals in which man is an accidental host.1 It has a worldwide distribution, affecting humans and animals both in the developed and developing countries. The disease burden is more profound in the developing countries due to lack of: effective public health measures, domestic animal health programs and appropriate diagnostic facilities. The situation is compounded by the resemblance of the disease with other diseases leading to incorrect diagnoses and under-reporting of the disease.2 There has been a rebirth of interest in brucellosis of the developed world, due to the growing phenomenon of international tourism, leading to importation of the disease. There is also a danger of the Brucella bacteria being used as a biological weapon.3,4 Every year 100 to 200 cases of brucellosis are reported in the United States.5 The Mediterranean Basin, south and Central America, Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa, the Caribbean and the Middle East are considered as high-risk countries.6 In the Eastern Mediterranean Region, the incidence of disease ranges from 1 per 100,000 to 20 per 100,000 population. However, the actual figure is thought to be 20 to 25 times greater than the official figures.7 Brucellosis is endemic in Saudi Arabia, where the national seroprevalence is 15%.8 The incidence of
brucellosis in the general population of Peshawar, Pakistan, was reported as 27.65%.9 The disease is primarily an occupational disease of those working with infected animals or their tissues. These occupations can be listed as: farmers, shepherds, butchers, abattoir workers, veterinarians and laboratory workers.10 The slaughterhouse workers are more prone to acquire infection as compared to other occupations because they are exposed to carcasses and viscera of infected animals and get infected through cuts and wounds and splashing of infected blood and other fluid in the conjunctiva.11 A study conducted in Iran cited the seroprevalence of brucellosis among slaughterhouse workers in Saudi Arabia, as 35.7%.12 In humans the intracellular bacteria, gives rise to a chronic granulomatous infection, causing clinical morbidity that requires combined prolonged antibiotic treatment.13,14 The cost of treatment and work days lost to ill health, combined with a loss of productivity in the animal husbandry, leads to decreased availability of food that adversely affects the health and economic well being of the population.15,10 In Pakistan, humans and animals live in close proximity. The rural population is dependent on agriculture and livestock farming to earn a living.16 Hence in order to plan meaningful interventions, there is a need to estimate the burden of disease in the population. Keeping this in mind
this particular study was conducted on a high risk occupational group of abattoir workers. The objectives of the study were to estimate the seroprevalence of brucellosis in abattoir workers of Lahore District and also to determine association of brucellosis with nature of job of workers.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2008. The four main slaughterhouses of Lahore were used in the study. The total study population of 4448 slaughterhouse workers consisted of Yateem Khana Chowk slaughterhouse (4173 workers), the Baghbanpura slaughterhouse (131 workers), Shahdarah slaughterhouse (115 workers), and Army slaughterhouse (29 workers). Epi-Info version 3.3.2 was used for sample size calculation, based on the total population of 4448 workers, with an expected proportion of 35% and a margin of error of 5%, using confidence level of 95%. The calculated sample size was 324, but making an allowance for non-response, a sample size of 360 was drawn for the study. Stratified sampling technique on proportional basis was used for selection of study subjects. The slaughterhouse workers were divided into seven strata based on their nature of jobs: meat sellers, slaughterers, animal keepers, drivers, cleaners, loaders and vets/paravets. Sampling frames for different strata were prepared and from each frame, proportionate numbers were selected through simple random method using random number tables. Based on the above technique we calculated the proportionate number of workers from each job category to be included in our sample. The proportionate numbers calculated and included in the study were as follows: meat sellers 166 (total 2100), 85 slaughterers (total 1075), 40 Animal keepers (total 506), 28 drivers (total 354), 20 cleaners (total 253), 12 loaders (total 151). The last category of vets/paravets was included as a whole owing to their small numbers (total 9). The study population thus selected was interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire and blood samples were obtained. Before collection of data and blood specimens the purpose of the study and blood collection procedure was explained to the workers and a written informed consent was obtained. Using aseptic techniques, 5ml of blood was drawn. Each syringe was marked with a permanent marker recording the questionnaire number of the respective study subject. The blood samples were analyzed at the Bacteriology Department of the Institute of Public Health, Lahore. After centrifugation of the blood at 4000 rpm for 5 min, the sera were analyzed using Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Technique for anti-Brucella IgG. The kit used was of Nova Tec 58
Immunodiagnostica GmbH (Germany). This kit was used for the qualitative determination of antiBrucella IgG.
RESULTS There were 360 male respondents with age ranging from 13 to 78 years, with a mean of 34.36±11.91 years. Majority of the respondents were illiterate numbering 209 (58%). Out of total 217, 60% were residents of urban localities. A large proportion 351 (97%) of the respondents belonged to the slaughterhouses managed by the government. The analysis of their blood samples using ELISA technique showed that 78 (21.7%) of the respondents tested positive for Brucella specific IgG, whereas, 282 specimens (78.3%) tested negative for antiBrucella IgG. (Figure-1) Brucella Seropositivity
21. 7 %
ELISA Posit ive
ELISA Negat ive
Figure-1: Immune status of respondents As shown in Table-1, the age group of 51–60 years had maximum proportion (38.5%) of individuals with positive immune status, followed by 41–50 years (33%). The smallest proportion of seropositives was in the youngest age group i.e. up to 20 years (9.3%). There was a statistically significant difference among the age groups with regard to immune status. The respondent’s duration in present job ranged from a minimum of 7 days to a maximum of 50 years, with a mean of 159.6 years. Respondents with duration of job less than a year, and those with job durations exceeding 20 years had a seropositivity of 33.3% and 32.6% respectively. A rise in seropositivity is observed as the duration of occupational exposure increases, with the exception of less than a year’s job duration. There is significant statistical association between the immune status and duration of job of the respondents (p=0.003). Of the respondents belonging to urban localities, a proportion of 22.6% tested positive on ELISA, whereas, 20.3% of those residing in rural localities were found seropositive. The proportion of seropositivity ranged from 20.6% in primary level educated, to 22.2% in those workers having education of matriculation and above. In the case of slaughterhouses administered by the government, 76 out of 351 (21.7%), and in the case of slaughterhouse under army
administration, 2 out of 9 (22.2%) of the workers tested positive respectively. Table-1: Socio-demographic profile of respondents by serology (n=360) VARIABLE Total Age group (in years) Up to 20 43 21–30 118 31–40 112 41–50 54 51–60 26 Above 60 7 Duration of job (in years) <1 6 1–5 48 6–10 90 11–20 130 >20 86 Residential background Urban 217 Rural 143 Educational status Illiterate 209 Primary 97 Matriculation 45 Graduate and above 9 Management of slaughterhouse Government 351 Army 9
ELISA POSITIVE No. % 4 19 26 18 10 1
9.3 16.1 23.2 33.3 38.5 14.3
2 2 16 30 28
33.3 4.2 17.8 23.1 32.6
46 20 10 2
22 20.6 22.2 22.2
The distribution of Brucella positive workers in various job categories is highlighted in Table-2. The proportion of seropositives in the animal keepers was the highest (37.5%) followed by loaders and vets/paravets having an equal proportion of 33.3%. The least proportion of seropositives were in the category of cleaners (15%) with none of the drivers testing positive. There is a statistically significant difference between the immune status of the respondents and their nature of job (p=0.005). Table-2: Sero-positivity by nature of job ELISA positive Total No. % 40 15 37.5 12 4 33.3 9 3 33.3 85 23 27.1 166 30 18.1 20 3 15 28 0 0 360 78 21.7 Total: Chi-square value of 18.58, df = 6, p = 0.005
DISCUSSION The most widespread zoonotic disease, brucellosis, is a source of major public health concern globally with negative implications for the economic prosperity of nations through its effect on humans, and the animal industry.17 The disease is contagious
and chronic in animals, leading to abortions, infertility and loss of livestock. The pattern of disease in humans is determined by the geographical distribution it follows in animals. Humans get infected by direct contact with infected animal products, ingestion of contaminated food, and inhalation of contaminated aerosols.18 Brucellosis is an occupational disease, of those who come in contact with infected animals and their products such as abattoir workers, veterinarian, slaughterers, laboratory workers, shepherds and farmers.19 The present study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis in one such high risk group, i.e., the abattoir workers. In this study the seroprevalence estimated using ELISA technique was found to be 21.7%. In Pakistan very few studies have been carried out on brucellosis especially on slaughterhouse workers and the only study retrieved from literature on the same occupational group as in the present study, was conducted by Masoumi et al in 1992. The prevalence found by the study was 8.33%.20 The results differ from our study due to the less sensitive test used, which was serum agglutination test and not ELISA.21 Studies performed on other occupational groups, include one carried out by Sohaila et al on milkmen, reporting the seroprevalence of brucellosis as 6.1%.22 The prevalence of brucellosis shows marked variation between countries. Our neighbouring country India has reported many studies on the prevalence of brucellosis. The seroprevalence of 25.45% and 25.5% determined by Kumar et al and Barbuddhe et al respectively, among abattoir workers are comparable with the present study.23,24 The comparable results of Indian studies to Pakistani studies may be attributed to both countries being agrarian societies, with close contact between animals and humans increasing their vulnerability to the disease. The seroprevalence of brucellosis among slaughterhouse workers in Saudi Arabia was reported to be 35%, 25 in Algeria it was 37.6% among abattoir workers, breeders, butchers and veterinarians26 and in Brazil the seroprevalence of brucellosis was 4.1% among slaughterhouse workers.11 Within a slaughterhouse, individuals have different job descriptions, altering their exposure to the disease. Therefore, in the present study workers were selected according to their nature of job and their seropositivity determined. A statistically significant difference was observed between the immune status of the respondents and their nature of job (p=0.005). Highest seropositivity was found in the category of animal keeper (37.5%), followed by the loaders (33.3%) and the vets/paravets (33.3%).
The high seropositivity observed in the animal keepers could probably be attributed to greater amount of time they spend with the animal, catering to the needs of the animal and even sleeping beside them. Whereas, vets/paravets look after the parturient animal and at times have to remove the retained uterine products probably giving rise to the high seropositivities among this category. The literature review does not point to any study having the same job categories as in the present study. However, studies have been conducted showing the association of nature of job to seropositivity. In a study by Karimi et al in Iran, seroprevalence of brucellosis was found to be 20% in slaughterers and 4% in butchers (meat sellers).12 Kumar et al conducted a study on abattoir workers in which, maximum seropositives of Brucella were found among the blood collectors group (99.77%), followed by the animal handlers (68.96%), butchers (68.00%), sweepers (57.14%) and 28.57% among the veterinarians.23 Another study conducted on high risk group individuals by Agasthaya et al reported results which found butchers and shepherds to be least affected. Individuals belonging to the veterinary group showed maximum seropositivity to brucellosis.27 No statistical association was found between the activity of slaughterhouse workers and seropositivity to brucellosis.11 Brucellosis affects all age groups and both sexes.26,28 In this study all respondents were males. A statistically significant difference was seen among the age groups with regard to immune status (p<0.05). The age group of 51–60 years contained the highest number of seropositives, followed by the age group of 41–50 years. In the present study, a direct relationship was observed between the workers age groups and their immune status. A minimum percentage (9.3%) of seropositives was found in the age group of up to 20 years, whereas, a maximum percentage (38.5%) was seen in the age group of 51–60 years. The low seropositivity in the age group of above 60 (14.3%) negates the argument of a direct relationship between age groups and seropositivity, but this can be attributed to the fact that their number was far less compared to other categories (Only seven individuals out of a total of 360 belonged to the age category of above 60 years). A study by Abu-Shehada et al also showed an increase in seroprevalence with advancing age.29 Various age groups have been identified by different studies for containing the maximum number of cases. According to Kadri et al, the age group of 21–30 years had the highest number (43%) of Brucella positives.28 A study conducted in Peshawar by Ali et al in 2007
identified the age group of 25–35 years, as the most commonly involved age group.9 The rural population because of its involvement in animal husbandry is more prone to infection as compared to its urban counterparts.30 Nabi et al have cited a study in which 84.2% of cases were from rural areas and 15.8% from urban areas.31 But no significant difference was found in seroprevalence between residential backgrounds in the present study (p>0.05). The results of Baba’s study in Nigeria are consistent with the present study showing no significant association between immune status and residential background.15 We found no relationship between the workers educational level and their immune status. The results of the study by Sumer et al are similar to the current study.32 However, Karimi et al have reported opposing results. They have shown a strong positive correlation between low literacy and seropositivity.12 It was noted that as the workers’ number of years at work increased, so did their seropositivity. The seropositives were minimal (4.2%) in the job duration category of 1–5 years, and maximum (32.6%) in the category of more than 20 years. Among the workers having less than a year’s experience at job, two individuals (33.3%) were found seropositive. One was a slaughterer, who had history of assistance in parturition of animals and also of keeping animals within the home premises. His seropositivity could be explained by exposure to these risk factors despite a short duration of job. A significant association between the immune status and duration of job of the respondents was observed (p=0.003) in the current study. Karimi et al and Sohaila et al have also highlighted a strong association between brucellosis and duration of occupational exposure.12,22
CONCLUSION Seropositivity to Brucella has a high prevalence among slaughterhouse workers owing to their close contact with animals.
RECOMMENDATIONS The prevention of human brucellosis is dependent on control of the disease in domestic livestock. This can be achieved by elimination of infected animals and mass vaccination of healthy ones. This will render individuals coming in contact with animals at a lower risk and help produce Brucella free animal products. Animal owners should be taught about the importance of vaccination of their animals. The lack of human vaccines makes it necessary for individuals employed in high risk occupations to take protective measures. The use of protective clothing while handling stillbirths or products of conception
can reduce occupation related disease. The avoidance of unpasteurized dairy products will prevent infection in the general population. As there is no effective and organized brucellosis control program in the country, the ultimate control would be achieved through a specially designed program aimed at public health education about the disease and its risk factors, maximum cooperation between the health and veterinary authorities, and alertness of the physicians to include brucellosis in their immediate diagnosis especially in the high risk groups. The disease is treatable with prompt and proper intervention. Enforcement of laws regulating the running of slaughterhouses should be implemented and adhered to in order to minimize the spread of infection. It is also recommended that further studies be carried out in other parts of the country not only involving the occupations at risk but also the general population.
Krikic-Dautovic S, Mehanic S, Ferhatovic M, Cavaljuga S. Brucellosis epidemiological and clinical aspects(Is brucellosis a major public health problem in Bosnia and Herzegovina?). Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2006;6:11–5. Thakur SD, Kumar R, Thapliyal DC. Human brucellosis: a review of an under-diagnosed animal transmitted disease. J Commun Dis 2002;34:287–301. Sauret JM, Vilissova N. Human brucellosis. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002;15:401–6. Izadjoo MJ, Bhattacharjee AK, Paranavitana CM, Hadfield TL, Hoover DL. Oral vaccination with Brucella melitensis WR201 protects mic against intranasal challenge with virulent Brucella melitensis 16M. Infect Immun 2004;72:4031–9. CDC: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Brucellosis. Atlanta: Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, [cited on 2007 Dec 7]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ ncidod/dbmd/diseaseinfo/brucellosis_g.htm Maurin M Maurin M. Brucellosis at the dawn of the 21st century. Med Mal Infect 2005;35:6–16. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. Annual report 2001: Division of communicable disease control. Cairo: World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean; 2002. Memish Z. Brucellosis Control in Saudi Arabia: Prospects and Challenges. J Chemother 2001;13:11–7. Ali A, Bahadar S, Ikhwan, Jehangir, Irshad. Study on the Clinico-epidemiological and therapeutic aspects of human brucellosis in NWFP. Life Sci Int J 2007;1:350–486. Chauhan HC, Chandel BS, Shah NM. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in buffaloes in Gujrat. Indian Vet J 2000;77:1105–6. Ramos TRR, Junior JWP, Sobrinho PAM, Santana VLA, Guerra NR, Melo LEH, et al. Epidemiological aspects of an infection by Brucella abortus in risk occupational groups in the microregion of Araguaina, Tocantins. Braz J Infect Dis 2008;12:133–8. Karimi A, Alborzi A, Rasooli M, Kadivar MR, Nateghian AR. Prevalence of antibody to Brucella species in butchers, slaughterers and others. East Mediterr Health J 2003;9:178–81.
Dornand J, Lafont V, Oliaro J, Terraza A, Castaneda-Roldan E, Liautard JP. Impairment of intramacrophagic Brucella suis multiplication by human natural killer cells through a contactdependent mechanism. Infect Immun 2004;72:2303–11. 14. Grillo MJ, De Miguel MJ, Munoz PM, Marin CM, Ariza J, Blasco JM. Efficacy of several antiniotic combinations against Brucella melitensis Rev 1 experimental infection in BALB/c mice. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58:622–6. 15. Baba MM, Sarkindared SE, Brisibe F. Serological evidence of brucellosis among predisposed patients with pyrexia of unknown origin in the north eastern Nigeria. Cent Eur J Public Health 2001;9:158–61. 16. Nusrat H. Disease specific diagnostic methods and lymphokines in human brucellosis [PhD thesis]. Karachi: University of Karachi, Department of Microbiology; 2004. 17. Michaux-Charachon S, Foulongne V, O’Callaghan D, Ramuz M. Brucella at the dawn of the third millennium: genomic organization and pathogenesis. Thol Biol 2002;50:401–12. 18. Salari MH, Khalili MB, Hassanpour. Selected epidemiological features of human brucellosis in Yazd, Islamic Republic of Iran: 1993-1998. East Mediterr Health J 2003;9:1054–9. 19. Almuneef MA, Memish ZA, Balkhy HH, Alotaibi B, Algoda S, Abbas M, et al. Importance of screening household members of acute brucellosis cases in endemic areas. Epidemiol Infect 2004;132:533–40. 20. Masoumi J P, Sheikh M A, Ahmad R, Naeem M, Ahmad M, Hussain I. Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in sheep, goats and man in Lahore area. Ind J of Dairy Sci 1992;14:298–9. 21. Sting R, Ortmann G. Experience with simple ELISA test systems for Brucella serology in cattle, sheep and goats. Berlinen and Munchener Wochenschrift 2000;113:22–8. 22. Mushtaq S. A study on brucellosis in individuals handling milking animals in Gowala colonoies of Lahore by serology [MPhil thesis]. Lahore: Post Graduate Medical Institute; 2004. 23. Kumar P, Singh DK, Barbuddhe SB. Sero-prevalence of brucellosis among abattoir personnel of Delhi. J Commun Dis 1997;29:131–7. 24. Barbuddhe SB, Kumar P, Malika SV, Singh DK, Gupta LK. Seropositivity for intracellular bacterial infections among abattoir associated personnel. J Commun Dis 2000;32:295–9. 25. Al-Sekait MA. Seroepidemiological survey of brucellosis antibodies in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 1999;19:219–22. 26. Habib A, Near A, Qamor J, Azrot R. Prevalence of brucellosis: a serological study in Tiaret, Western Algeria. Arab Gulf J Scientific Res 2003;21:244–8. 27. Agasthya AS, Isloor S, Prabhudas K. Brucellosis in high risk group individuals. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007;25:28–31. 28. Kadri SM, Rukhsana A, Laharwal MA, Tanvir M. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in Kashmir (India) among patients with pyrexia of unknown origin. J Indian Med Assoc 2000;98:170–1. 29. Abo-Shehada MN, Odeh JS, Abu-Essud M, Abuharfeil N. Seroprevalence of brucellosis among high risk people in northern Jordan. Int J Epidemiol 1996;25:450–4. 30. Smits HL, Basahi MA, Diaz R, Marrodan T, Douglas JT, Rocha A et al. Development and evaluation of a rapid dipstick assay for serodiagnosis of acute human brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:4179–82. 31. Nabi G, Mir NA. Brucellosis in pediatric patients: a review of 114 cases from Asir region. Ann Saudi Med 1992;12:286–8. 32. Sumer H, Sumer Z, Alim A, Nur N, Ozdemir L. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in an elderly population in MidAnatolia, Turkey. J Health Popul Nutr 2003;21:158–61.
Address for Correspondence: Dr. Fatima Mukhtar, 7-Aziz Bhatti Road, Lahore Cantt. Lahore, Pakistan. Email: [email protected]