of the injection of foreign protein on gastric secretion and motility in normal and diseased ... that what was really a spontaneous remission was due to our efforts at treatment, we studied ..... meal of meat during the febrile stage. When the fever
shocked the world with the first human to human heart transplant. ... Questions Remain on. Routine ..... to answer the questions of clinical efficacy and safety.
(hallux rigidus). An orthotic with a rigid, finger-like projection under the big toe prevents painful movement of the toe. Also helpful is a traditional rocker bottom ...
energy you burn. Overeating and lack of physical activity are the main reasons why people pack on excess pounds. However, aging also can contribute to weight gain as well as to an increase in body fat. That's because as you age, you gradually lose mu
SARS Revisited: The Challenge of Controlling Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Local ..... Addressing New Emerging Infectious Disease Threats and.
Mar 8, 2014 - B, Axial T2 FLAIR image of a 6-year-old girl with acute dissemi- ... children must have frequent lab evaluations. Other common side effects include ..... Clinic in Minnesota: Phone: 800-323-2688 (toll-free) or 507-284-2509.
resected. A posterior annuloplasty is then performed with ... most frequent finding is tricuspid regurgitation secondary ... The DeVega technique is a running.
Wetjen occasionally reviews the medical history,. MRI scans, and videos sent by parents who are considering .... pathologic finding in this class of disorders is the presence of ubiquitin-positive neuronal and glial inclusions in ... officials in Ind
procedure is available at no additional charge to all female patients ... cameras mounted on a modified mammography unit. ... In 1968, Bentall and De Bono de-.
American Association of Clinical Endocrinolo- gists and the Mayo Clinic Division of Endocri- nology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition. Hossein Gharib, MD, of the Division of Endo- crinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition at Mayo Clinic in Mi
rence, (2) few local symptoms, (3) intramural origin with eventual ... The gastric tumors were usu- ... Intramural esophageal tumors and duodenal and proxi-.
pneumoniae from the PROTEKT surveillance study, and comparative in vitro activity of the ketolide, telithromycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50(suppl ...
re-engineering strategies that rely on getting closer to what the consumer is thinking and feeling. Design and innovation firms suggested empathy as a pathway to improved customer services. Renaissance Health even called on Disney Imagineers to help
nomas â whose cells typically look and act .... Health Letter, Subscription Services, P.O. Box 9302,. Big Sandy, TX ... Barium enema (colon X-ray). â This test ... Like a barium enema, it involves radiation ..... wash your hands with soap and.
Nov 10, 2011 - Current Trends in the Practice of Medicine. Vol. 27, No. 5, 2011. INSIDE THIS ISSUE. 2Enhanced Recovery. Pathway: Rethinking. Pre- and Postoperative. Surgical Care for. Colorectal Patients ..... titioners, internists, general practitio
Feb 22, 2011 - Global tuberculosis control 2010. http:// whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241564069_eng.pdf. ...... AAOS = American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons; ADA = Ameri- can Dental Association; ANP = acute ...... intolerance to a co
mune system launches an attack on the body's own cells or ... prior to starting TNF inhibitor treat- ment. ... abatacept (Orencia); tocilizumab (Actemra); anakinra ...
Focus on PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Vol. 28 Supplement ..... 3.0T MR-guided laser ablation of a prostate cancer recurrence in the post- surgical prostate ...
Dec 22, 2011 - Comorbidities. Neurologic Surgery and Clinical Neurology News ... treatment was often delayed because the cause .... or subdural hygroma.
Contact: 800-323-2688 or e-mail: [email protected] Update in EEG, EMG, and Clinical Neurophysiology. February 24 - March 2, 2013. Amelia Island, Florida.
5Robotic Thyroidectomy. 6Diabetes and Cancer. Endocrinology News from Mayo Clinic. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2010. EndocrinologyUpdate. In 1984, the adrenal pathologic findings in. 4 Mayo Clinic cases of Cushing syndrome led to characterization of a unique diso
From the Department of Internal Medicine (A.P.S.), Division of Hospital Inter- nal Medicine (D.J.R.), Department of Family Medicine (S.P.M.), and Division of. General Internal Medicine (F.S.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. This work was supported in
windowed results are shown with dash lines. 111 ...... (2.11). The only parameter that can change the phase of the velocity in the force term is the radiation force function Y which introduces phase Î¸d. The radiation force function for five differen
ing of the capsule, nodular hypertrophy, fatty degeneration, grcat congestion, and multiple .... sion, and in most cases the pyloric mucosa appeared normal. They.
PART II: WALTER HUBERT LECTURE CHEMOTHERAPY OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL CARCINOMA C. G. MOERTEL, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A. In the Western world, carcinoma of the pancreas has waxed as gastric cancer has waned, but both remain as major causes of cancer mortality. Carcinoma of the stomach dominates the cancer incidence of Asia and the Soviet Union. Cancers of the liver and oesophagus ravage the continent of Africa in almost epidemic proportions. In spite of the great human need which this problem presents, there are few areas where the inadequacies of modern medicine are so apparent as in the management of upper gastrointestinal cancer. With all the sophistication of our diagnostic approaches, and with the ingenuity and heroism of the surgical attack, end-result statistics show that over 95 % of patients found to have cancer of the oesophagus, liver, biliary tract, or pancreas will die of their disease, as will almost 90% of patients with gastric cancer. These grim statistics have changed little if at all over the past 30 years. Until methods can be evolved for either prevention or for practical detection of upper gastrointestinal carcinoma in the asymptomatic state, we must deal with the problem as the patient presents it to us, and clearly this is not at a stage amenable to surgical cure. There would not seem to be a realistic hope that advances in surgical technique per se can subsequently change these statistics. The results of surgery essentially plateaued a quarter of a century ago. Any progress, it would seem, must be derived from nonsurgical approaches. Among these, radiation therapy is hampered by its regional restriction and by lack of specificity. Immunotherapy has, as yet, no track record and may be largely an illusion. In spite of all its limitations, the most tangible hope in the foreseeable future would seem to rest with
or methods were extravagantly praised by one investigating group only to be damned by another. Objective response rates with 5-FU therapy of large bowel cancer, for example, were reported over the astounding range of 8 to 85%, even though all investigators were treating the same neoplasm with the same drug by the same dosage schedule (Moertel and Reitemeier, 1969). After these initial reports, numerous new wrinkles for administering 5-FU, or its blood-brother 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR), were de-
vised and would predictably be advocated by the devisers as having improved therapeutic effectiveness. Such claims, however, could be regarded as little more than testimonials, since they were not validated by concurrent control groups. The reader was left- with the impossible task of judging whether the reporting investigator at that point in time was an 8 percenter or an 85 percenter. Over the past decade, the mediaeval methodology of our earlier chemotherapy trials in gastrointestinal cancer has slowly, and sometimes painfully, given way to more meaningful and reproducible scientific approaches. Although some still cling to the delusion that they can devise historical controls for retrospective comparisons, it has now become the more accepted practice for comparative clinical trials to be prospective and randomized in design. Considerable progress has also been made in defining, standardizing, and communicating the results of clinical trials. A number of factors have been elucidated which contributed to the striking variations in response rate reported in the earlier literature. For almost all areas of therapeutics it is evident that far-advanced disease, producing severe physiologic alterachemotherapy. tion, will be far less likely to respond to Chemotherapy of gastrointestinal carci- either surgical or medical treatment than an noma had its beginnings with the develop- earlier and less devastating stage of the ment in clinical application of 5-fluorouracil disease. This difference, it would seem, (5-FU) some 18 years ago. Early reports of should be seen in even bolder relief for the therapeutic effectiveness of this and other patients subjected to stressful cytotoxic agents presented the reader with such a drugs with a narrow therapeutic ratio. In confusing labyrinth of claims and counter- Table I the results of chemotherapy of gastroclaims that an aura of witchcraft hovered intestinal cancer are related to the degree of over those engaged in this field. New drugs disability of the patient at the time treatment
B.A.C.R. 17TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
TABLE I.-Relationship of Performance Status to Chemotherapy Response of the Gastrointestinal Cancer Patient A. Gastric cancer Objective Performance response (%) Patients status* 39 66 0-1 26 47 2 4 21 3 B. Colorectal cancer Objective Performance response (0O) Patients status* 31 97 0 17 145 1 7 103 2 7 15 3 * ECOG Scale: 0, fully active, to 4, totally dIisabled.
initiated. Disability is scored by the criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. A score of 0 is fully active, a score of 4, totally disabled. With a gastric carcinoma patient who is still able to work full or parttime (score 0 or 1), we get a most respectable response rate of 390%. For the patient who is up and about more than half the day but is unable to work (score 2), the response rate is almost cut in half. For the patient who is ambulatory and able to come to the office but is in a bed or chair most of the day, the response rate plummets to 400. Precisely the same relationship is seen in the much larger group of patients with colorectal The fully ambulatory patient cancer. achieves a 31% response rate, the substantially disabled patient a 700 response rate. We do not treat totally disabled patients, but if we did, it could be surmised that we would see essentially no response at all. It can, therefore, be anticipated that an investigating group which treats largely ambulatory outpatients may achieve quite favourable responses to a given therapeutic regimen. On the other hand an investigating group who will either by their philosophy or by the nature of their practice treat largely disabled patients may report a very unfavourable therapeutic experience with precisely the same regimen. The criteria chosen by an investigating group to declare an objective response can also have great influence on reported results. Unfortunately, in chemotherapy of gastrointestinal cancer, one only rarely sees the dramatic and complete tumour remissions that occur in lymphomas or breast cancer.
In the main, we must deal with partial regressions of vaguely defined lumps and livers. A great deal of faith must be placed in the objectivity of the investigator, and even then it must be realized that he is fully subject to the human frailty of committing error. We have recently completed a study of reproducibility of measurements of lumps (Moertel and Hanley, in press). In this study the investigators measured simulated tumour masses in pairs of the same size but under circumstances where the investigators did not know they were the same. We observed striking differences in measured sizes, to the degree that an objective response would frequently be recorded for a tumour mass that had not changed at all. The salient facts of this study, which involved a number of investigators performing several hundred measurements, were that, if one used as a criterion for response a 5000 reduction in the product of perpendicular diameters, an 8% response rate would be obtained due to measuring error alone (in essence, the response to a placebo). If one used just a 25% reduction criterion, as has been the practice in some studies, the placebo response rate soared to 23%. Whenever therapeutic results are reported, it is essential to scrutinize precisely what criteria were employed. It has now become a common practice to employ a 50% reduction in the product of longest perpendicular diameters as the criterion for declaring an objective response. With such a criterion, one must anticipate a 5 to 100% response due to error. These erroneous responses can be reduced by more frequent measurements, of tumour masses, or by using a longer interval between measurements, and thus taking advantage of the natural growth rate of the neoplasm. Certainly, any responses based on a 25%0 reduction criterion must be considered as highly suspect. Another factor that can have a major influence on reported chemotherapy results is the method of data analysis. There are any number of ways of subjecting results to statistical massage; and if you are skilful at playing this game, it is remarkably easy to turn a sow's ear into a silk purse. One of the most frequent ploys is the unevaluable patient gambit. The technique is to take patients who start on treatment but who become too sick to continue or who die soon after and discard these from your analysis as " unevaluable ". In some reports one-third
THE 8TH WALTER HUBERT LECTURE
TABLE II.-Comparative Survival Times Among Specific Types of Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas Measured From Time of Proof of Incurable Cancer Survival
Primary tumour Hepatoma (cirrhosis) Gall bladdler Pancreas Stomach Duodenum Bile ducts Ampulla of Vater Jejunum and ileum Carcinoid (small bowel) Islet cell carcinoma
Range week to 40 months 1 week to 23 months 4 weeks to 10 years 4 weeks to 12 years 3 weeks to 13 months 2 weeks to 43 months 6 weeks to 39 months 5 weeks to 34 months 8 weeks to 23 years 5 months to 13 years 1
to one-half of the original patients are swept TABLE III.-Clinical Characteristics and under the table in this manner, and this, of Survival in Patients with Unresectable course, greatly inflates the response rate. Gastric and Pancreatic Carcinoma Such a legerdemain, however, would seem to -edian survival (months) MC be a rather questionable practice. If a Characteristic Gastric Pancreatic patient becomes too sick to continue treatment, or if he dies, he would seem as evaluable Exteint of disease Regional 6-0 5-0 as he can get. Indeed, it is quite possible Abdominal 3-0 4-0 that adverse effects of treatment could have Hepatic 2-5 2-5 contributed to his rapid deterioration. If a Extra-abdominal 2-0 2-0 patient is selected for treatment and initiated Location of primary on treatment, he deserves a place in the (pancreas) Head 4-0 denominator.
The natural history of untreated upper gastrointestinal carcinoma Before discussing treatment, we should first have some concept of the natural history of the disease we are treating, at least in terms of survival. This provides us with an essential background against which we can view our therapeutic accomplishments. Table II shows the longevity of untreated patients with upper gastrointestinal carcinoma, measured from the time of proof of unresectable disease. There is a striking range in longevity among the specific tumour types, ranging from the virulent hepatomas, complicating cirrhosis, and carcinoma of the gallbladder, to the remarkably indolent carcinoid tumours and islet-cell carcinomas. It can also be seen that there is a striking range in longevity within each tumour type. It is worth emphasis that some of these patients can have exceedingly long survivals with no treatment whatsoever. In Table III the more specific characteristics of the patient and his disease that have a significant influence on prognosis are considered. Here we have employed our more frequent upper gastrointestinal carcinomas, cancer of the
Body Tail Grade of anaplasia (Broder's) 1 and 2 3 and 4 Interval, resection to
7-0 4- 0
5-5 3 -0
to 5 months 6 to 11 months 12 to 23 months 24 months and over Palliative surgery None Bypass Resection 1
2-0 3-0 6-0 6-5 3.5
stomach and cancer of the pancreas. These determinants are particularly important in providing appropriate stratification for randomized trials. We found that age and sex of the patient had little influence on longevity except that the very elderly, 75 years or older, tended to have shorter survivals. As might be expected, the patients with only regional disease lived longer than those with distant abdominal spread, who lived longer than those with hepatic metastasis, who lived longer than those with extra-abdominal metastasis. Location of the primary lesion in the stomach had no influence, but patients with carcinoma of the head of the pancreas
B.A.C.R. 17TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
lived longer than those with primaries in the body or tail-perhaps because the tumour in the head is heralded at an earlier stage by the development of obstructive jaundice. Also, as might be expected, patients with highly anaplastic neoplasms had a much more rapid course than those with a well-differentiated microscopic morphology. Again, perhaps proving the obvious, malignant disease that is indolent in its earlier phases tends to be indolent throughout its course. In gastric cancer, this can be demonstiated by the interval from resection of the primary with curative intent to proof of metastases; in pancreatic carcinoma, by a less precise measure, the duration of symptoms. If the surgeon performs a palliative procedure, such as a bypass or resection, the patient does live longer. This may be artifactual, however, since in the patient with very advanced disease, the surgeon may consider a palliative attempt either injudicious or technically impossible. We have also found that assessments of immune function have prognostic significance. Elevated immunoglobulins indicate a very short survival. The patient with lesser numbers of T cells or impaired T-cell function also lives a shorter period of time. Such patients with impaired laboratory parameters of immune function, however, are also patients with advanced stages of disease associated with impaired nutrition and impaired performance status. We are not convinced at this time that these elaborate and expensive immunologic assays tell us more than can be discerned by already apparent clinical determinations. Treatment of gastrointestinal cancer with 5-
fluorouracil 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was the first chemotherapeutic agent to prove capable of inducing tumour regressions of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma in the hands of all investigators reporting its use. Although the true therapeutic value of this agent may be questioned, it has nevertheless served as a stimulus and catalyst for clinical research in the treatment of this most common group of neoplasms. In an attempt to improve the therapeutic ratio of 5-FU, this agent has been delivered through every natural or artificial orifice into almost every available human lumen by
every conceivable dosage schedule. Predictably, each new approach has been lauded by the initiator as more effective, less toxic, and eminently suitable for office practice. Equally predictably, none of these claims have stood the test of a controlled clinical trial. Noteworthy conclusions of these controlled trials have been the following: (1) the nucleoside of 5-FU, 5 fluoro-2'deoxyuridine (FUdR), does not have any significant clinical advantage over 5-FU (Reitemeyer, Moertel and Hahn, 1965); (2) slow infusion of these fluorinated pyrimidines adds expense and nuisance to the treatment procedure but not improved therapeutic efficacy (Reitemeyer and Moertel, 1962; Moertel, Reitemeyer and Hahn, 1967; Moertel et al., 1972); (3) the oral route of administration of 5-FU is associated with erratic drug absorption and significantly inferior therapeutic effect, regardless of administration schedule (Hahn et al., 1975; Bateman et al., 1975; Ansfield, 1975) and (4) weekly administration of 5-FU is significantly inferior to the loading course method (Ansfield, 1975). Table IV would seem to put the fluorinated pyrimidine question into proper prospective. Here we have related the objective response rates to 5-FU or FUdR, regardless
TABLE IV.-Toxicity and Objective Response to Fluorinated Pyrimidine Therapy A. Gastric cancer ( 110 patients) Objective response (%) 26 41 P < 0 05 133 B. Colorectal cancer (381 patients) Nadir of leucopenia Objective response (%) 4000/mm3 9 4000 to 1500/mm3 23 SP < 0 01 1500/mm3 153 Nadir of leucopenia 4000/mm3 4000 to 1500/mm3 1500/mm3
of how they were given, to degree of toxicity as measured by nadir of leucopenia. It is evident that if no toxicity at all is experienced, results are inferior to those when patients are treated to mild or moderate toxicity. On the other hand, treating to severe or nearly lethal toxicity does not improve, but rather seems to detract from, therapeutic effect. It must be concluded that 5-FU or FUdR are not cancer-specific drugs. Any significant effect on the neoplastic tissue must be achieved at the price
THE 8TH WALTER HUBERT LECTURE
of some toxic effect to normal tissues. A severe cytotoxic effect, however, seems to be more detrimental to host than to tumour. CHEMOTHERAPY OF GASTRIC AND PANCREATIC CARCINOMA
Single agent therapy To this date, our primary task in chemotherapy of pancreatic and gastric carcinoma has been a search for single agents that will show some evidence of significant activity when used alone and, hopefully, will form the basis for a later evolution of combination drug therapy regimens. In this quest, we have followed largely an empirical road. Table V shows our single-agent experiences with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. These have been singularly discouraging.
TABLE VI.-Chemotherapy of Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: Single Agents Regimen Patients 5-FU 72 BCNU 33 Adriamycin 29 Methyl CCNU 15 14 Fluorometholone CCNU 11 11 Mitomycin C
brighter picture in gastric carcinoma, however, it would seem quite clear that single-drug therapy has not provided substantive benefit in any type of gastrointestinal cancer. Much of our more recent efforts have, therefore, been directed towards combination drug therapy. rule of thumb, we feel that TABLE V.-Chemotherapy of Advanced Pan- for drugs toAsbea effective in combination, they creatic Carcinoma: Single Agents must show some evidence of activity when Median duration of used alone. Combining ineffective drugs has inevitably led to ineffective combinations. Objective response Also, we have felt that one must be able to Patients response (months) Regimen use the constituent drugs together with a less 6 (15%) 2-5 39 5-FU 18 BCNU than proportionate summation of their toxic 2 (13%) 15 8-5 Methyl CCNU effects. Our first study in this regard was an 13 Actinomycin D evaluation of combinations involving 5-FU, 13 1 (8%) MTX (i.v.) Mitomycin C, and BCNU. In pilot studies, 1 (9%) Adriamycin 7 Fluorometholone we found that when Mitomycin C and BCNU 6 MTX (Oral) were used in double combination, you could 1* 12 Misc. (< 3 each) use only one-half of a full dose of each. * Single patient treated with FUdR. Mitomycin C and 5-FU looked a bit better, permitting two-thirds of a full dose of each. 5-FU produces only a minimum response 5-FU and BCNU look particularly attractive rate and the responses are exceedingly tran- since 75% of the full dose could be combined sitory. Bischloroethyl nitrosourea (BCNU) with no more toxicity than using either of the and methyl chloroethyl cyclohexyl nitro- drugs alone. With this background, we then initiated a controlled evaluation, randomizing sourea (methyl CCNU) have been equally discouraging. None of the other single drugs 215 patients with gastrointestinal cancer to at which we or others have looked show treatment with each of the single drugs, with anything more than an occasional spurious each of the three possible double drug combinations, and with the triple drug combinaresponse. In quite remarkable contrast are our tion (Reitemeier, Moertel and Hahn, 1970). results with single-agent therapy of gastric Regrettably, none of the combinations percarcinoma (Table VI). Here we have much formed any better than 5-FU alone and most of them were worse. We were particularly more respectable response rates and these with agents of a variety of specific activities. disappointed with combined 5-FU and BCNU 5-FU produces a very acceptable rate and which had demonstrated only a minor and duration of regression. Surprisingly we have insignificant increase in duration of response. achieved an excellent response rate with In this study, as was common practice in that adriamycin, a drug that is essentially worth- era, we put all the specific types of gastroless for colorectal cancer. Even with this intestinal cancers into the same pot in the 11
3B.A.C.R. 17TH ANNUAI GENERAL MEETING
belief that they would all respond the same. In recent years, it has become evident that this is an erroneous assumption. All gastrointestinal cancers are not alike. When we looked at our responses of specific cancers to combined 5-FU and BCNU, we found that the response rate for colorectal cancer was abominable and this negative observation has subsequently been confirmed by Lokich and associates. On the other hand, the response rate in a very small group of gastric and pancreatic carcinomas looked remarkably good. With this encouragement we expanded our controlled study to a much larger group of 167 gastric and pancreatic cancer patients randomized to 5-FU alone, BCNU alone, and the 5-FU/BCNU combination (Table VII) TABLE VII.-A Controlled Evaluation of Combined 5-FU and BCNU Therapy for Advanced Gastric and Pancreatic Carcinoma Primary site Stomach Pancreas
(Kovach et al., 1974). In gastric cancer, 41O% of patients responded to the combination compared to 290% and 170% with the single drugs. In pancreatic cancer it was 3300 vs 16% and 000. If we take the liberty of grouping these two sets of data and calling them all upper gastrointestinal carcinoma, then the superiority of the 5-FU/BCNU combination approaches statistical significance. But to be really clinically significant, objective response must translate into a favourable change in the natural history of the disease. The only objective means of measuring this is in terms of patient survival. When we analysed our survival curves for carcinoma of the pancreas, we found that all overlapped and they were essentially the same as that of clinically matched untreated patients. For gastric cancer, however, the picture was a bit brighter. BCNU alone clearly added nothing, but both 5-FU and the combination were associated with improved early suvival. This quickly faded with 5-FU, but it continued with the combination. At one and one-half years 27% of
these patients with far advanced gastric cancer treated with 5-FU plus BCNU were still living compared to only 700 with either single drug or with no treatment at all. With this glimmer of success, we then turned our attention to the newer nitrosourea analogues, particularly to methyl CCNU. This drug has the advantage of an oral route of administration whereas BCNU has to be given i.v. Also, methyl CCNU seems to have some therapeutic advantage in animal models. In the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, therefore, we initiated a study in gastric cancer comparing methyl CCNU alone with the combination of 5-FU and methyl CCNU (Moertal et al., in press). In this study we threw in the wrinkle of cyclophosphamide induction, and that was a total failure (Table VIII). The combination of
TABLE VIII.-Therapy of Advanced Gastric Cancer: Methyl CC.INU Alone vs 5-FU Methyl CCNU; with An Evaluation of Cyclophosphamide (CTX) Induction Objective
Regimen Patients response (%) CTX -- methyl CCNU 30 7 Methyl CCNU alone 37 8 CTX--5-FJU+ methyl CCNU 30 20 5-FU + methyl CCNU 30 40* * 5-FU + methyl CCNU superior to all other regimens, P < 0 * 05.
5-FU and methyl CCNU, however, garnered a 400% objective response, significantly superior to that achieved with methyl CCNU alone. In addition, survival of patients treated with the combination was also significantly superior to that for patients treated with the single drug. Further confirmation of the effectiveness of this combination has come from studies by the Southwest Oncology Group (Baker et al., 1975) (Table IX). This study involved a spectrum of upper gastrointestinal carcinomas and compared the TABLE IX.-A Comparison of 5-FU + Methyl CCINU vs 5-FU Alone in Upper Gastrointestinal Carcinoma (Southwest Oncology Group), 5-FU given by wleekly
Regimen 5-FU alone 5-FU + Methyl CCNU
Patients 22 53
Objective response (00) 9 25
THE 8TH WALTER HUBERT LECTURE
5-FU/methyl CCNU combination with 5-FU Chemotherapy of oesophageal carcinoma used alone. In this study the weekly method Squamous cell carcinoma is not an unfor 5-FU was employed; and perhaps because common malignant disease and surgical of this, overall response rates were scaled results have been characterized by an down. But again, there was a substantial operative mortality rate that exceeds the cure advantage for the combination in comparison rate. It is surprising that chemotherapy to 5-FU alone. With 3 successive studies experience with this disease has been so showing improvement in response rate with meagre. Bleomycin has perhaps had the the combination compared to single drug largest overall clinical application. The treatment, and with 2 successive studies reported response rates with this drug, demonstrating significant improvement in however, are far from impressive. Among survival, I believe we are now justified in 14 consecutive patients we treated with concluding that combined 5-FU and nitro- bleomycin as a single agent, we did not sourea therapy is a significant advance in the observe any evidence of therapeutic activity. management of gastric cancer. The question Our only other trial has been with the nitroremains to be answered whether we can do sourea, CCNU. Here we observed 3 remore with this combination than just shrink sponses among 19 patients treated and these lumps and delay death. Combined 5-FU and persisted for periods of only 2, 3 and 9 methyl CCNU as an adjuvant to potentially months. Certainly this is nothing approachcurative gastric cancer surgery is now under- ing a therapeutic accomplishment. Our pregoing clinical trial in the Gastrointestinal sent effort in oesophageal carcinoma must Tumour Study Group, the Eastern Coopera- be in Phase II evaluations of single drugs, tive Oncology Group, and the Veterans with the hope that we can unearth at least a Administration Surgical Adjuvant Group. few agents with some degree of activity that can form the constituents of rational drug Combination chemotherapy of pancreatic car- combinations. cinoma Table X shows overall experience with Chemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma combination chemotherapy of advanced pan- (Table XI) creatic carcinoma. The best results we have We have had occasional brief responses with systemic 5-FU, and others have noticed TABLE X.-Chemotherapy of Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma with Drug ComTABLE XI.-Chemotherapy of Hepatoma binations Regimen 5-FU + BCNU 5-FU + streptozotocin 5-FU + cyclophosphamide 5-FU + fluorometholone 5-FU + Mitomycin C
Median duration of Objective response Patients response (months) 21 7 (33%) 5-5 11 2 (18%) 6-0 10
obtained to date have been with the 5-FU/ BCNU combination, and this, as mentioned above, did not produce any improvement in patient longevity. The other combinations employed have added little if anything to the meagre accomplishments of 5-FU used alone. The primary task in pancreatic carcinoma remains a search for significant therapeutic activity. 23
occasional brief responses with 5-FU or FUdR by hepatic artery infusion. Studies at the University of Wisconsin (Davis, Ramirez and Ansfield, 1974), however, have shown that the expensive and cumbersome intra-arterial approaches really contribute nothing significant to patient survival. Of special interest to us has been the quite impressive response rate we have achieved with combined 5-FU and BCNU therapy.
B.A.C.R. 17TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Thirty-seven per cent of our patients have shown tumour regression and 3 of these were of very long duration. In a recently completed joint African and American study of hepatoma therapy (Falkson, Moertel and Lavin, 1976), adriamycin as well as the combinations of 5-FU plus each of the 2 nitrosoureas, methyl CCNU and streptozotocin, all produced a significant improvement in survival of hepatoma patients when compared to treatment with 5-FU alone. We are now most interested in pursuing the 3 drug combinations of 5-FU, methyl CCNU and adriamycin.
Chemotherapy of the carcinoid tumour and the malignant carcinoid syndrome The malignant carcinoid syndrome provides a dramatic event in oncologic practice. We must, however, restrain our zeal to expose these patients to the hazards of cytotoxic drugs at an early stage of the disease. This tumour is exceedingly indolent and patients can frequently have several years of productive life before the disease causes them any real disability. Although the carcinoid syndrome may be fascinating to the physician, its early stages seldom cause the patient more problems than an occasional blush and mild diarrhoea which can be controlled with standard symptomatic measures. All the patients listed Table XII, TABLE XII.-Chemotherapy of Carcinoid Tumour
incomplete and short-lasting. Since streptozotocin has hardly any haematological toxicity, it can be combined with other cytotoxic drugs in essentially full doses of each agent. Our rate of response with a cyclophosphamide/streptozotocin combination was very disappointing. It was, however, exceedingly favourable for the 5-FU/streptozotocin combination. Both of these combinations are currently undergoing more extensive evaluation in an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. Great caution must be exercised in offering effective chemotherapy to the patient with the malignant carcinoid syndrome, since this may trigger off a severe and life-threatening carcinoid crisis. We have not found any serotonin antagonist to combat this complication effectively. In treatment of the carcinoid syndrome, it is therefore our policy to initiate therapy with one-half the projected therapeutic dose in patients who have florid manifestations of the syndrome or who have urine 5-hydroxyindolacetic levels greater than 150 mg/24 h.
Chemotherapy of islet-cell carcinoma Much akin to the carcinoid is the islet-cell carcinoma, a tumour with a variety of functional capacities. As in the carcinoid, we have seen an occasional response with 5-FU (Table XIII). Streptozotocin, howTABLE XIII.-Chemotherapy of Islet-cell Carcinoma
ever, has written a new chapter in the treatment of these neoplasms. Among a therefore, had far advanced disease and yet collected series of 56 patients with hor5-FU alone produced a reasonable rate of monally active islet-cell carcinomas reported by Broder and Carter (1973), functional response. A few years ago we reported therapeutic activity with streptozotocin improvement was observed in 64% and (Moertel et al., 1971), and this has subse- objective tumour regression was seen in 37%. quently been confirmed by others. Re- We have observed 3 objective responses sponses to this agent, however, are usually among 6 patients, one of which was most
THE 8TH WALTER HUBERT LECTURE
gastrointestinal cancer are of sufficient value to justify offering as standard or routine treatment. We must continue to regard all patients at this stage of their disease as subjects for clinical research. It is obvious that the only hope for increasing cure rates for upper gastrointestinal cancer in the foreseeable future lies in the application of chemotherapy, or perhaps immunotherapy, to the patient who has been brought to the point of minimal tumour CONCLUSIONS burden by surgical resection. Surgical adjuUntil the very recent past, chemotherapy vant chemotherapy attempts in the past have of upper gastrointestinal cancer was largely been notable only for their failures. The an academic endeavour with no evidence of chemotherapy applied under these circumsubstantive contribution to the overall popu- stances, however, has had very little evidence lation of patients treated, whether measured of therapeutic activity, e.g. thiotepa, 5-FU, in terms of symptomatic palliation or im- FUdR and Mitomycin C. With the signiproved survival time. Now, however, it is ficantly greater activity now demonstrated possible to recognize a few definite steps of by our combination regimens, it would seem progress. Refinements of methodology have appropriate that new efforts at surgical allowed data to be communicated in a adjuvant therapy be undertaken. In treating the patient with upper meaningful way. In comparative trials, the randomized prospective design now permits gastrointestinal cancer, it is evident that believable differences to become apparent neither surgeon, radiotherapist, nor oncowithout the cloud of subjectivity and arte- logist have accomplished anything of real facts that obscures the testimonial-type value by working alone or in sequence, nor reports or the study based only on historical is there any realistic hope that such solo controls. Although 5-FU probably remains performances will produce any substantive the most active single drug in upper gastro- future accomplishment. If, however, we intestinal cancer, definite antineoplastic effect can offer our patients the best of all concerned has been demonstrated for a number of other disciplines, working together in carefully agents. It does, however, seem obvious that designed protocols, then I feel we can conno single drug therapy has been of significant fidently anticipate significant improvements value for the upper gastrointestinal cancer in the results of treatment for tomorrow's patient, whatever the stage of the disease at upper gastrointestinal cancer patient. which it is administered. Following the path that has led to success in leukaemia, lymphoma and breast cancer, increasing emphasis REFERENCES is now placed on combination chemotherapy regimens for upper gastro-intestinal cancer. ANSFIELD, F. J. (1975) A Randomized Phase III Study of Four Dosage Regimens of 5-fluorouracil. Combined 5-FU and nitrosourea therapy has A Preliminary Report. Proc. Am. Ass. Cancer increased response rate for carcinomas of the Res., 16, 224. stomach, pancreas, and liver to the 30 to BAKER, L. H., MATTER, R., TALLEY, R. & VAITV. (1975) 5-FU vs 5-FU and MeCCNU 40% range. In gastric carcinoma and in inKEVICIUS, Gastrointestinal Cancer. Proc. Am. Ass. hepatoma this has also been associated with Cancer 16, 229. improved patient survival. Combined 5-FU BATEMAN,Res., J., IRWIN, L., PUGH, R., CASSIDY, F. & even and streptozotocin has produced higher WEINER, J. (1975) Comparison of Intravenous and Oral Administration of 5-fluorouracil for Colorectal response rates in the carcinoid tumour and Carcinoma. Proc. Am. Ass. Cancer Res., 16, 242. islet-cell carcinoma. BRODER, L. F. & CARTER, S. K. (1973) Pancreatic Even though these results may seem Islet Cell Carcinoma. II. Results of Therapy with Streptozotocin. 52 Patients. Ann. int. exciting, they are certainly far from our Med., 79, 108. ultimate objectives. Responses in advanced H. L., JR, RAMIREZ, G. & ANSFIELD, F. J. disease are still transient and all the patients DAVIS, (1974) Adenocarcinoma of Stomach, Pancreas, still die of their disease. None of our apLiver and Biliary Tracts. Cancer, N. Y., 33, 229. proaches for advanced and metastatic upper FALKSON, G., MOERTEL, C. G., LAVIN, P. T. (1976)
dramatic, in a patient near death with a fulminating pancreatic cholera syndrome, showing a high rate response to the 5-FU/ streptozotocin combination. Some of these responses have also been of a very striking nature and of very long duration. This combination is currently being compared in a controlled study with streptozotocin used alone.
B.A.C.R. 17TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Chemotherapy of Primary Liver Carcinoma. A Parallel Study in American and African Bantu Patients. Proc. Am. A88. Cancer Re,s., 17, 21. HAHN, R. G., MOERTEL, C. G., SCHUTT, A. J. & BRUCKNER, H. W. (1975) A Double Blind Comparison of Intensive Course 5-fluorouracil by Oral V8 Intravenous Route in the Treatment of Colorectal Carcinoma. Cancer, N.Y., 35, 1031. KOVACH, J. S., MOERTEL, C. G., SCHUTT, A. J., HAHN, R. G. & REITEMEIER, R. J. (1974) A Controlled Study of Combined 1,3 Bis (2-chloroethyl) 1-nitrosourea and 5-fluorouracil Therapy for Advanced Gastric and Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer, N. Y., 33, 563. MOERTEL, C. G. & HANLEY, J. A. (1976) The Effect of Measuring Error on the Results of Therapeutic Trials in Advanced Cancer. Cancer, N. Y MOERTEL, C. G., MITTLEMAN, J. A., BAKEMEIER, R. F., ENGSTROM, P. & HANLEY, J. A. (1976) Sequential and Combination Chemotherapy of Advanced Gastric Cancer. Cancer, N. Y. MOERTEL, C. G. & REITEMEIER, R. J. (1969) Advanced Ga8trointe8tinal Clinical Management and Chemotherapy. New York: Harper and Row. p. 71. MOERTEL, C. G., REITEMEIER, R. J., SCHUTT, A. J.
& HAHN, R. G. (1971) Phase II Study of Streptozotocin in the Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer. Cancer Chemother. Rep., 55, 303. MOERTEL, C. G., REITEMEIER, R. J. & HAHN, R. G. (1967) A Controlled Comparison of 5-fluoro-2deoxyuridine Therapy Administered by Rapid Intravenous Injection and by Continuous Intravenous Infusion. Cancer Re8., 27, 549. MOERTEL, C. G., SCHUTT, A. J., REITEMEIER, R. J. & HAHN, R. G. (1972) A Comparison of 5-fluorouracil Administered by Slow Infusion and Rapid Injection. Cancer Res., 32, 2717. REITEMEIER, R. J. & MOERTEL, C. G. (1962) Comparison of Rapid and Slow Administration of 5fluorouracil in Treating Patients with Advanced Carcinoma of the Large Intestine. Cancer Chemother. Rep., 25, 87. REITEMEIER, R. J., MOERTEL, C. G. & HAHN, R. G. (1965) Comparison of 5-fluorouracil and 2deoxy-5-fluorouridine in Treatment of Patients with Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Colon or Rectum. Cancer Chemother. Rep., 44, 39. REITEMEIER, R. J., MOERTEL, C. G. & HAHN, R. G. (1970) Combination Chemotherapy in Gastrointestinal Cancer. Cancer Res., 30, 1425.