Dr. Sam Sheppard was accused of beating his wife to death. - The show âThe Fugitiveâ was based on his life. He said he was asleep in the living room when his wife was attacked and the intruder knocked him unconscious. - It looked bad for him sinc
Detection of specific antibody has a temporal but not a causal association. â¢ Positive or negative predictive value of result depends on the clinical picture and the.
chromatin determination in hair root sheath cells, and reported generally .... blood smears fvred in methanol declines over the course of time, but the reason for the ..... There were five males and fwe females in the test group, and differences ...
2.4 Evidence Processing, Note Taking, and Report Writing . .... Forensic Biology. In the forensic laboratory, serology analysis refers to the screening of evidence for body fluids while DNA analysis refers to the efforts to individualize .... from de
on evidentiary items before DNA analysis is attempted. Depending on ..... indicate either a small amount of seminal fluid or the presence of a different body ..... Amylase is found in a variety of body fluids, saliva, blood, urine, sweat, tears, seme
Apr 5, 2008 - These areas which are not accessible are called slack space. Several .... like bmap or slacker that access this free space and hide data in it.
Franz Josef Holzer (1 903-1 974) was a well-known ... secretor characteristic as a marker in forensic investigations. The 1953 paper reviewed the current status of blood group- ing, especially in its medico-legal applications. Dr. Holzer spent much .
Evidently the problem of interfacing has been generally solved by applying the newly developed microprocessors in clinical chemical instrumentation (6,7,8). This new kind of electronic device, basing on the "very large integration technology" has bee
terfaces permit MS analyses of molecules in the molecular weight range of drugs of .... been reported for metabolites of nicotine in plasma and d~-dex- trometborphan in ...... niques for the structural elucidation of fluconazole. Rapid. Commun.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 40:246â52, 2012 .... a battle between law and medicine over which of the .... free and courteous deportment, and an air of kind-.
May 20, 2015 - lar institutional variant, local police/sheriff control of the crime lab, and one .... Forensic labs that are entirely independent of law enforcement are rare in the his- .... which does not span the entire geography of the county.
Past tuberculosis +/J treatment; ... The time to detection of growth of a mycobacterial species can be shortened significantly with .... M gordonae, and M kansasii.
OTDR. Engineering System Outcomes. Snell's Law. Fresnel reflection. Modal boundary conditions. Optical properties of materials spectroscopy. Rate equations. Pumping. Inversion. Stimulated emission resonators. Physical Concepts in Photonics. Engineeri
Tech Task Forces that are not associated with a forensic laboratory provide computer crime services. There is ... investigators or other law enforcement employees to perform most crime scene functions. As a result, the .... over 75% of the clan lab c
Sep 24, 1982 - disseminated gonococcal infection, one Bartholinitis, three epididymitis, and one a rectal abcess. Patients without gonorrhoea. This included ...
Forensic Psychiatry and the. Forensic Sciences: In Memory of. Peter J. Batten, MD. Joseph D. Bloom, MD. This commentary is dedicated to the memory of Peter ...
ILD and autoimmune serologic testing were included. Serologic .... >7.7 U/L. Abbreviations: ANA Antinuclear antibody, CCP Cyclic citrullinated peptide, IgG.
An alcoholic solution of cholesterin on the other hand cannot be so peptized. Dropped into water, needle crystals of cholesterin form immediately, which despite ...
This paper presents a new power electronics laboratory. The primary purpose of the ..... Available: http://www.mathworks.com/products/ide- link/?s_cid=0909_.
Serum anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) measurement should not be used alone in the initial .... are described, cytoplasmic (cANCA) and perinuclear.
1986). The introduction of the highly sensitive and specific immunoblot assay (enzyme-linked immunoelectrophoresis blot [EITB], Western blot) for the diagnosis ...
Sep 22, 2003 - Methods: Syphilis serology test results of factory workers, who each donated at least six ..... Application of forensic identity testing in a clinical.
Toxoplasma gondii causes severe fetal disease during acute infection in pregnant women, thus demanding early ... techniques such as IgM capture tests increased the sensitivity of these ... IgG avidity was introduced for temporal definition of.
VDFS procedure manual (24) or using an organic extraction proce- dure, followed by Micron .... sure washer to flush the linear polyacrylamide out of the channels ..... Easley CJ, Karlinsey JM, Bienvenue JM, Legendre LA, Roper MG,. Feldman ...
RYAN FORENSIC DNA CONSULTING NEWSLETTER,VOL. 1, ISSUE 2
D ec od in g D NA : T he Ex pe rt Ex plan ation Old, but not forgotten...
Forensic Serology in the Modern Laboratory
IN THIS ISSUE: FEATURE ARTICLE FORENSIC SEROLOGY IN THE MODERN LABORATORY A discussion of forensic serology techniques and testing procedures in the modern forensic laboratory including possible false positives and interpretational errors. Biological fluids that can be identified as well as those that currently can not be identified are discussed MONTHLY JOURNAL REVIEW THE IMPORTANCE OF CASEWORK REVIEW A brief article reviewing data from 8 years of case review is summarized and the importance of serological testing is noted. DISCOVERY CORNER THE CASE FILE This monthly column discusses the importance of each item requested through discovery for defense review.
EXPERT CONSULTING What an Expert Witness/ Forensic DNA consultant can do for you.
by: Suzanna R. Ryan, MS If you read the headlines, you may have gotten the impression that DNA analysis is the only thing going on in the crime lab’s biology section. However, forensic serology, or, in it’s more recent incarnation, “biological evidence screening”, still plays a major role in forensic casework. The majority of the evidence items that go on to DNA testing are first examined for the presence of biological materials. The typical examinations that are performed by the forensic laboratory include screening for the presence of blood, semen, and saliva. In addition to these biological fluids, some labs screen for the presence of urine and/or feces and some will examine “touch” DNA evidence for the presence of nucleated, or DNA-bearing, cells.
Testing that is not routinely performed in forensic laboratories includes screening for the presence of vaginal fluid, sweat, and menstrual blood (as opposed to circulatory blood). In fact, for the most part, the tests simply do not exist in forensic laboratories at this time. The following is a discussion of the common methodologies used in order to screen biological evidence and a brief glimpse into the future of forensic serology. In addition, false positives and improper interpretation of the test results will be covered. Blood It is important to understand that many of the tests performed by the lab are merely presumptive tests. These tests only indicate that a particular substance might be present. However, there are other known substances which can also yield a positive result. For example, the blood presumptive tests used by most forensic laboratories are quick color change tests that have multiple known false positives. Orthotolidine and Leuchomalachite Green for instance, will react in the presence of many plant peroxidases. Therefore it is important to read the results of a positive carefully. For example, a reddish stain located in the same area as a possible grass-stain on a pair of jeans could potentially yield a positive result even if the reddish stain is not actually blood. Later testing may yield a DNA profile, but it is possible that the DNA profile is actually from skin cells and the presumptive positive blood test was reacting with plant material, not blood. In fact,
RYAN FORENSIC DNA CONSULTING PH. 949-973-7588
unless a blood confirmatory test is performed, it is improper to state on a report that blood was identified even if a DNA profile is obtained from the stained area.
Confirmatory tests for blood are routinely available at most forensic laboratories. However, these tests do have cross-reactions with other higher primates and they have been shown to react with ferret blood as well. Also, the majority of forensic labs no longer perform species of origin testing. The older blood confirmation test (called the Ouchterlony test) was more difficult and time-consuming to prepare, use, and interpret and has been superseded in most, if not all, forensic labs by the much quicker and easier HemDirect or HemaTrace card assays. However, with the transition to the “easier” confirmatory tests, labs have lost the ability to determine if the blood detected is from an animal such as a dog, pig, or cow. Saliva The saliva tests commonly used in forensic laboratories are actually presumptive tests for the presence of amylase, which is merely a component of saliva. Amylase is also a component of a multitude of other body fluids at lower levels than generally found with saliva. The amylase tests (usually either the phadebas test or the starch-iodine radial diffusion test) will indicate if amylase is present and will also give a general indication for the quantity of amylase present. Typically a strongly positive amylase test is a good indicator for the presence of saliva. However, it is important to be aware of what sort of sample is yielding the positive result. For example, a positive amylase result originating from a stain in the crotch area of a pair of women’s underwear has the potential to be from sources other than saliva. It should be taken into consideration that vaginal secretions, urine, feces, and sweat (all possible contributors to the crotch area of www.ryanforensicdna.com
RYAN FORENSIC DNA CONSULTING NEWSLETTER,VOL. 1, ISSUE 2
Copper and Nickel salts
rat, pig, and elephant saliva
fluids also containing amylase:
vaginal acid phosphatase
certain vegetables (cauliflower)
underwear) also contain amylase at varying levels and the positive presumptive amylase test might actually be detecting a combination of these body fluids and not saliva. Semen Forensic labs generally perform both presumptive and confirmatory tests on semen stains. The presumptive test, usually an AP, or Acid Phosphatase test, is a quick color change test that indicates that semen might be present. However, it is well known that false positives do exist with this test. In fact, one of the most common false positives is vaginal acid phosphatase (VAP). VAP is present in varying concentrations in the vaginal fluid and pregnant women are known to exhibit higher levels of VAP. In addition, if an AP test is not read at the appropriate time (typically within 2 to 3 minutes), a false positive may be observed simply due to the reaction of the chemicals used in the test with exposure to air. It is important to note that neither an Alternate Light Source, nor a Woods lamp, is considered to be a presumptive test. These are simply tools that can be used to aid the investigator in locating possible semen-stained areas for further testing. Therefore it might be quite common for a forensic nurse examiner to locate and swab a “Woods lamp positive” area on the body of a rape victim, and yet the laboratory be unable to detect the presence of semen from this swab as it simply does not exist. Confirmatory tests for the presence of semen include a microscopic examination and identification of spermatozoa as well as the P30 assay. The P30 assay is typically used only when a sample is AP positive, but no sperm can be identified under the microscope. P30 is a component of semen found in very high concentrations and it’s level in seminal fluid is unrelated to the amount of sperm present. Therefore, a P30 positive result can be obtained from an aspermic individual.
RYANFEB FORENSIC 2012 DNA
Table of known false positives associated with the blood, semen, and saliva presumptive tests commonly used in forensic laboratories.
It is generally best to have visual confirmation of the presence of sperm cells via a microscopic exam. Additional information, such as the approximate number of sperm cells can also be gleaned at this time. Importantly, the number of sperm cells observed is often only noted in the analyst’s notes, and not in the actual serological report. Instead it is often reported that a sample is “positive for the presence of semen” even if only one or two sperm cells could be located. This can be somewhat misleading as the presence of a single sperm cell may mean something far different than the presence of a multitude of sperm cells. Low levels of sperm can mean that an extended length of time between alleged assault and collection of the sample has taken place (especially in the case of body cavity samples), or it could mean that the sperm located are present due to transfer from an object. For example, a few sperm cells located on a pair of underwear may be present simply because the underwear was placed in the same laundry hamper with a semen-stained item or the underwear was washed in the same washer as a semen-stained item. Kafarowki, et al illustrated in their 1996 paper that sperm could be retained on an item of clothing even after washing and that sperm could transfer in a washing machine to previously unstained items. Additionally, Allard and Rankin report on a presentation given by Gerry Davidson of the Forensic Science Service which discussed the possibility of transfer of spermatozoa due to contact and/or laundering. Davidson reports that while he did not observe the transfer of sperm cells onto clean children’s underwear through storage in a laundry basket with semenstained items alone, he did observe the presence of trace amounts of sperm cells on both the inside and the outside of each pair of underwear stored and washed with semenstained items. In addition,trace amounts of spermatozoa were able to be collected from the door, drum and seal of the washer.
RYAN FORENSIC DNA CONSULTING PH. 949-973-7588
The possibility of transfer of sperm cells should be carefully considered, especially if the area where the sperm cell(s) are collected is: 1. AP negative (AP is an enzyme that loses it’s reactivity when exposed to water. If an item has been washed, sperm cells may still be present, but it is unlikely that the AP test would yield a positive result.) 2. on the exterior, or some area other than the crotch, of underwear 3. exhibiting very low levels of sperm Future methods The future of forensic serology may lie with nucleic acids - but this time it is RNA, not DNA that plays the starring role. Researchers have been working on using bacteria for the identification of vaginal secretions as well as menstrual blood. A 2010 article by Fleming and Harbison discussed their use of rRNA for the identification of vaginal specific bacteria. They have created an 11-plex assay that can identify circulatory blood, menstrual blood, saliva, semen (in the presence and absence of spermatozoa) and vaginal secretions.
RYAN FORENSIC DNA CONSULTING NEWSLETTER VOL. 1, ISSUE 2
Other researchers (Sakurada, et al) are using realtime RT-PCR and ELISA assays to detect a component of sweat called Dermicidin (DCD). They found that the Real Time RT-PCR test could detect DCD in 7-day-old stains containing as little as 10ul of sweat and the test showed high specificity when testing stains containing 30ul of other body fluids. Their ELISA assay was able to detect sweat diluted up to 10,000-fold and could specifically detect DCD in 10ul of body-fluid stains. A benefit of using Real-Time ReverseTranscriptase PCR is that it allows for the identification of body fluids, and the coextraction of both RNA and DNA. This ultimately means that little to no sample is wasted on identifying the body fluids present in the sample. Unfortunately, these RNA testing methods are still in the research stages and have not yet made their way to the forensic laboratory. In conclusion: Biological screening results must be performed
and interpreted correctly in order to be useful and have the maximum impact in a case. If presumptive testing is not performed on an item, it is not appropriate to “assume” that a substance is present. For example, if a sample from a drinking glass yields a DNA profile, it cannot be assumed that saliva was present as the DNA could just as easily come from skin cells transferred through the handling of the glass. Additionally, it should be remembered that while confirmatory tests do exist for blood, semen, and saliva, they are not always used by the lab. It is important to carefully read the report to determine if a substance has been identified via a confirmatory test, or if it merely tested positive with a presumptive test. Serological testing can be very important in corroborating or negating the victim’s version of events. Likewise, untested items can be useful in helping to substantiate an alternate version of events and should not be overlooked. In addition, it is important to be aware of the possibility of false positives and incorrect inferences regarding serological results. ❖
Monthly Journal Article Review This month’s article for review is currently In Press in the journal Science and Justice. The article is entitled, “The importance of scientific evaluation of biological evidence - Data from eight years of case review” by Heather Miller Coyle and I found it to directly correlate with this month’s feature article regarding the importance of serological testing. While noting that the majority of the cases reviewed by the author had little or no problems detected, the article discusses a variety of problems uncovered during defense review. These included issues with evidence collection, documentation, and preservation - especially in relation to cold or post-conviction cases. Ms. Coyle notes that in one case, bloodied items of evidence from the victim were co-mingled with items from the defendant. The evidence was re-packaged and submitted to the lab as if it had never been improperly packaged and stored. It is for this reason that it is of the utmost importance that all chain of custody documents, evidence photos, and notes must be reviewed. The article goes on to discuss issues that arose with a case in which only positive presumptive blood test results, and not the negative confirmatory test results, were reported out. This is a clear violation of guidelines which state that all results, whether positive or negative, must be reported. The article also cautions against making assumptions based upon DNA results alone regarding when or how a blood pattern was placed on an item of evidence. Some cases that were reviewed by Ms. Coyle illustrated the tendency for the prosecution to submit to the lab for testing only those items that would tend to corroborate their version of events. Considering the fact that many forensic labs are now limiting the number of items processed per case, it is even more important for a defense expert to review not only what items were tested, but what items were collected, and not tested as they may lend credence to an alternate explanation or hypothesis of what actually occurred. Several other thought-provoking examples are provided in this interesting article and it would prove beneficial for all sides of the criminal justice system to read this short piece. RYAN FORENSIC DNA CONSULTING PH. 949-973-7588
DISCOVERY REQUEST CORNER A detailed sample discovery request form is available at http://ryanforensicdna.com/ discovery_request. However, you may be wondering why each of these items is important in the case review process. This month we will focus on the first item on the list. A complete copy of the case file is the single most important item for review as it contains the underlying data that the analyst relied on to come to their conclusions. A case review cannot be completed using the DNA report alone. The case file contains all of the analyst’s bench notes taken during the time of the testing (both serological testing as well as DNA testing). Without the case file, one cannot confirm that the samples were examined and analyzed appropriately and that all controls performed as expected. The case file should also contain the chain of custody, phone logs, mixture interpretations, statistical calculations and all bench notes and worksheets as well as any photographs of the evidence and evidence packaging. Any applicable CODIS upload sheets will be contained within the case file as well and can be reviewed for accuracy.
RYAN FORENSIC DNA CONSULTING NEWSLETTER VOL. 1, ISSUE 2
RYAN FORENSIC DNA CONSULTING SERVICES : DNA REVIEW
Complete review of the serology and DNA case file including chain of custody, lab bench notes, DNA data, statistical conclusions, and report findings. Review of all logs, manuals, and validation documents.
ATTORNEY ASSISTANCE Assistance with discovery requests, cross-examination questions, review or observation of opposing expert testimony and observation of DNA testing.
Decoding DNA - The Expert Explanation Ryan Forensic DNA Consulting 3548 Woodland Way Carlsbad, CA 92008
DNA case? Consider hiring a Expert DNA Consultant
Ryan Forensic DNA Consulting DNA cases are becoming more and more complex thanks in part to the multitude of “touch” DNA samples being collected and submitted to the laboratory. If you have a DNA case, you may want to consider hiring an expert to help explain exactly what the results do (and do not) mean as well as to confirm that the results obtained by the DNA laboratory are accurate and complete and that the conclusions drawn in the report are supported by the data. Ryan Forensic DNA Consulting is willing and able to assist you in all aspects of DNA case review, attorney preparation, testimony review, and observation of DNA
testing (which can be especially important if the lab will consume the entire item of evidence to complete it’s testing). In addition, we can provide attorney training, either formal for MCLE credit, or informal. Topics for training range from the basic (“What is DNA?”) to much more advanced and can be tailored to meet your exact needs. Contact us today for more information! ph. 949-973-7588 www.ryanforensicdna.com