... core FOR13P4: stereo plot of the main axes direction. Notice that the K3 is well grouped and close to the vertical except some points associated with MMITs.
Cud chewing per lb of DM (Georgia). â¢ 19 to 21% forage NDF ... (Wisconsin). â¢ Calculate the amount of effective NDF (IL) ... Float off the plant parts. â¢ Evaluate the ...
Skewness varied from strongly coarse and near symmetrical 0.34- Ï and 0.09 Ï. The kurtosis average value was 0.87 Ï and -1.4 Ï (platykurtic and leptokurtic).
and their structural, electrical, magnetic and magnetoelectric properties were ... static ME voltage coefficient. For electric poling, the ... stray charges developed were eliminated by grounding the pellet holding plates. ..... 20.2 0.586. 0.4. 5.
Snijders P, Jeurgens LP, Sloof W (2002) Structure of thin aluminium-oxide films determined from valence band spectra measured using XPS. Surf Sci. 496:97â ...
modified Warren-Averbach procedures have been suggested , enabling to determine (i) ... reflections can be given by the Warren-Averbach equation :.
Jul 15, 2008 - bMaryland NanoCenter, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Received 28 May 2008; revised 20 June 2008; accepted 20 ...
A considers a MIN with a sorting grain that reduces the probability of network blocking by using a contention- free switch. Subsection 7.B describes the combina-.
Many industrial processes need information about material grain size. In this work we ... FIN - 90570 Oulu, Finland. Email: (hannu.rautio,[email protected] ...
Mar 14, 2016 - 10048. 336. 29.9. 38.3. 3.69. 80.2. âA wns. 132. 82. 3.3. 3.81. 12.7. 0.355. 10392. 339. 30.6. 36.7. 4.53. 79.7 t test ns ns ns ns ns ns. * ns. **. **. **. *. Individual environment types. (a)Australian rainfed/irrigated environments
Jul 20, 2015 - appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. ... the operation of solid-state lithium batteries containing LLZO because the ...
Sep 26, 2017 - Netherlands, 4 Departament de Geologia, Universitat AutÃ²noma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. The flow of ice depends on the ..... on calculating the stress field from kinematically admissible velocity fields that minimizes the ..... s
Scutella separated from germinating grains of barley (Hordeum vul- gare L. cv Himalaya) tookup 1 millimolar L-1"Cjproline at an initial rate of about 6.5 ...
Apr 13, 2011 - c Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, .... through conventional sintering processes leads to large grain sizes. .....  R.M. German, Sintering: Powder Metallurgy Science, Metal Powder Industries.
assessing the effects of shaking and fluidization on ... ducted laboratory and micro-gravity fluidization ex- ... some unusual properties, including âinverseâ size-.
the grain size in order to predict the susceptibility of different steel grades to ductility problems during continuous casting processes. The results are ... STAGE IV - Ferrite transformation ..... Î´ : Kronecker's delta function, Î´i,j=1 for i=j an
Apr 15, 1987 - both Barkhausen signals increase in proportion to grain size. The paper ... Real-time observation of electrical vortex core switching. Appl. Phys ...
Mar 24, 2017 - where Ï is a measured stress, d is the average grain diameter, and Ï0 and ks ... authors imply that Ï0 is a generalization of the Peierls-Nabarro.
Feb 10, 2017 - superplastic forming. The DRX process was documented as being closely related to temperature  and strain rate [8,9], and was usually ...
Shiv Kumar Pandev et al point to a broader peak, while high values of KG (leptokurtic case) denote a pro- nounced peak in the centre. Kurtosis ranged between ...
Jul 6, 2016 - input in the Canary basin: evidence of iron particle retention in the ...... kaline volcanic rocks, which never show free quartz. (Schmincke and ...
Statistics of the grain-size distribution were computer calculated with a U.S. Geological Survey Marine. Geology grain-size program (McHendrie 1988). Grain-size statistical parameters and graphic representations are given in phi units. The phi unit (
Sep 2, 2015 - assessed for interstitial free (IF) and dual phase (DP) steels with grain ... mild steels such as interstitial free (IF) steels and high strength steels ...
Aug 12, 2013 - measurement of resistivity, it is found that the values of the metalâinsulator ... grain size effect, whereas it decreases with the increases of the.
Journal of Stored Products Research 69 (2016) 65e71
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Stored Products Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jspr
Grain size and grain depth restrict oxygen movement in leaky hermetic containers and contribute to protective effect Scott B. Williams*, Larry L. Murdock, Kabita Kharel, Dieudonne Baributsa Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history: Received 11 May 2016 Received in revised form 10 June 2016 Accepted 14 June 2016 Available online 23 June 2016
1. Introduction Insect pests that damage grain during postharvest storage are a threat to food security, especially in the developing world. There, postharvest losses to insects can reduce food availability by 20e50% (Keil, 1988; Pantenius, 1988; Boxall, 2002; Mulungu et al., 2007). Lack of access to reliable and affordable pest control methods force many smallholder farmers to sell their grain at harvest when the price is at the low point of the year and buy it back later when food needs demand they purchase it and prices are higher (Boxall, 2002; Jones et al., 2011; Njoroge et al., 2014). Hermetic storage containers (metal silos, drums, PICS and GrainPro bags, etc.) address the problem of small-scale grain storage (Moussa et al., 2014). Sealed hermetic containers prevent the
ﬂow of oxygen from outside into the grain. Any insects present in the grain when it is placed in the hermetic container use up the limited oxygen and create conditions that are unsustainable for them (Oxley and Wickenden, 1963; Quezada et al., 2006; Murdock et al., 2012). The adoption of PICS bags in Africa has grown steadily since 2007 with 7 million bags having been purchased thus far. Fifty percent of the cowpea not sold at harvest is now stored in these ﬂexible containers or in other types of hermetic containers (Baributsa, 2014; Moussa et al., 2014; Ibro et al., 2014). Farmers who use these bags have enjoyed lower rates of pest damage, higher grain quality, and improved selling prices at the market (Baributsa et al., 2010). Farmers are encouraged by PICS’ promise of better grain storage, as evidenced by the continued sales of the bags (Murdock and Bauoa, 2014). Even so, some farmers have expressed concerns about grain stored in bags that may have small leaks. Handling the bags increases the likelihood of mechanical damage and certain insect species (e.g. Callosobruchus maculatus and Prostephanus
S.B. Williams et al. / Journal of Stored Products Research 69 (2016) 65e71
truncatus) can chew holes through the liners. This will permit airﬂow into the bags and raises the possibility of subsequent insect damage to the grain (Baoua et al., 2014; Hell et al., 2014). However, several years of observation in the ﬁeld indicate that damage to the grain in such bags is minimal (Baoua et al., 2014). In short, despite localized breaks in the airtight seal of the bag, PICS bags continue to be effective in preventing postharvest losses. Understanding why small holes or tears in the polyethylene liners do not result in failure of the bags’ ability to protect grain may provide insight that could lead to making the bags more effective. Here, we hypothesize that the grain itself contributes to the PICS bags’ protective action. It is well-known that grain bulk can contribute to the resistance to diffusion of gases through the storage environment (Shunmugam et al., 2005; Haung et al., 2013) and that different grains facilitate different rates of diffusion (Singh et al., 1984). Accordingly, we investigated the role grain may serve in the protective performance of hermetic containers compromised by the presence of small holes or tears. 2. Methods 2.1. Infested grain preparation Cowpea bruchids (Callosobruchus maculatus) were obtained from laboratory colonies maintained on cowpea. Black-eye cowpea, variety #8046 (Wax Co., Armory, MS USA) was used for all trials. The grain was held in a freezer at 0 C for 5 days prior to each trial to ensure it contained no living insects. Four days before setting up each experiment, 2 L of cowpea were removed from the freezer and divided between two glass jars. One jar was heavily infested with C. maculatus adults from the laboratory colony. The second jar, with no insects present, was sealed and returned to the freezer. One day before each trial, the sealed jar was removed from the freezer and given time to warm to room temperature. The adult bruchids in the ﬁrst jar were removed by sifting using a No. 18 sieve. The two quantities of grain, infested and uninfested, were then mixed together in a 17 L bucket to create a 2 L, 50:50 mixture of infested and uninfested cowpea. Four samples of 100 seeds were removed from the mixture and examined under a magnifying lens. The mean number of infested cowpeas-those cowpeas possessing at least one bruchid egg on its surface-out of each sample of 100 was recorded (Table 1). 2.2. Experimental setup We used experimental containers constructed from 4 cm diameter PVC pipe (Fig. 1). Each unit was divided into two sections: The ﬁrst (Section A) was 10 cm long and ﬁlled with 100 mL of infested cowpea (Fig. 2a). This section was sealed with a cap using vacuum grease. At the center of the cap was a 1.5 mm inlet hole that served as the only entry point for air into the pipe. A small, rectangular piece of 100 mm, steel mesh was placed over the inlet hole to prevent it from being blocked by grain in the pipe above it (Fig. 2b). The second section of the experimental container (Section B) was 50 cm long and connected to Section A with a PVC coupling
Table 1 Initial seed infestation for all three trials. Infestation rates are given as the percentage of seeds with at least 1 bruchid egg on its surface out of a 100 seed sample. Trial
Mean infestation (%)
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
39.75 50.25 28.25
1.43 3.42 1.75
Fig. 1. Schematic of grain barrier pipe system. The 10 cm, Section A pipe was ﬁlled with 100 mL of infested cowpea and then sealed with a cap. The cap contained a single inlet hole (1.5 mm diameter) for permitting airﬂow. The 50 cm, Section B pipe was ﬁlled to different depths (0, 5, 15, 30 and 50 cm) with one of our three barrier grains (maize, sorghum, or sesame).
unit. Section B pipes were ﬁlled with one of three barrier grains depending on the trial (Trial 1- Sesame, Trial 2- Sorghum, Trial 3Maize). We selected these grains as our barriers due to the clear differences in the average volume of individual kernels. This gave us the opportunity to determine if kernel size inﬂuenced the effectiveness of the grain barrier. Seed volumes (Table 2) are estimates based on published measurements of seed dimensions. The amount of grain used to ﬁll these pipes depended on the grain depth we wished to simulate. Greater depths would result in greater separation of the infested cowpea in Section A from the outside air. Treatment depths ranged from 0 cm for controls to 50 cm for the deepest grain group. All trials lasted 72 d. This period was sufﬁcient for two, full reproductive cycles of the cowpea bruchid. Trials were held inside a Conviron™ environmental chamber in the Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS) lab (Fig. 3). Ambient conditions were maintained at 26 C and 30% RH. At the end of the 72 d period, the Section A pipes containing the infested cowpea were placed in a freezer for two weeks. Samples were later removed from each pipe and evaluated. 2.3. Evaluation 2.3.1. Seed damage Two samples of 100 cowpeas each were removed from the 10 cm pipes and evaluated for insect damage. We recorded three values for each sample: 1) the number of adult emergence holes
S.B. Williams et al. / Journal of Stored Products Research 69 (2016) 65e71
Fig. 2. Experimental hermetic containers used for the grain barrier study (a). Stainless steel mesh (b) served as a protective barrier to prevent incidental sealing of the 1.5 mm inlet hole in the containers’ caps.
Table 2 Estimated average volumes for kernels of three stored grains. Grain
Avg. volume (mm3)
Sesame Sorghum Maize
4.0 54.0 170.0
Tunde-Akintunde and Akintunder, 2004 Mwithiga and Sifuna, 2006 Tarighi et al. 2011
(AEH) per 100 cowpeas, 2) the number of larval air holes (LAH) per 100 cowpeas, and 3) the dry mass of each sample of 100 cowpeas. An adult emergence hole, which has a regular, circular shape, shows that an adult bruchid has emerged (Fig. 4a). Larval air holes are made by bruchid larvae and are commonly seen when larvae are exposed to low-oxygen environments (Murdock et al., 2012). These holes are smaller than AEHs and are irregularly-shaped (Fig. 4b). Each type of hole was counted via visual inspection of each cowpea from a particular sample. After counting, each sample was placed in a drying oven at 60 C for 5 d to remove free moisture. Cowpea samples were removed from the oven, allowed to cool, and weighed on an electronic balance. The mass of each sample was recorded to the nearest hundredth of a gram. 2.3.2. Data analysis The number of AEH and LAH in each cowpea sample was divided by the initial number of infested seeds recorded at the beginning of
Fig. 3. For trials involving maize, sorghum, and sesame, experimental pipes were oriented vertically and stored in a Conviron™ environmental chamber.
each trial. For example, if the infestation rate was 50 cowpeas out of 100 at the start of the trial and the number of adult emergence holes per 100 cowpea sample was 103, this resulted in an index value of 2.07. This index value served to standardize observations across our trials and to estimate the relative increases in population size or damage in relation to the initial value. The normal distribution of assessment values (AEH, LAH, and 100 seed mass) was veriﬁed using the Anderson-Darling test. Twoway ANOVA was used to determine the effect of grain depth and grain volume on all three assessment values.
3. Results 3.1. Effects of grain type Grain depth and seed size had signiﬁcant, negative effects on the number of AEH and LAH in each cowpea sample (Fig. 5a,b; Table 3). For control pipes, the index value for the AEH relative to the initial infestation ranged between 0.87 (sesame) and 2.07 (sorghum) per 100 seeds. The index value for LAH relative to the initial infestation ranged between 3.32 (sesame) and 5.15 (maize) per 100 seeds. AEH numbers were lower because an adult bruchid only makes one emergence hole as it leaves the cowpea. A larval bruchid can potentially make several air holes over its development. Alternatively, two or more larvae may make a LAH each, but one or both may die and thus not create any emergence holes. This larval mortality then increases the number of LAH present relative to AEH. As barrier depth increased, the relative number of AEH and LAH per sample declined. Treatments at the ends of our experimental range (control and 50 cm) were always statistically signiﬁcant. However, treatment groups one step apart (i.e. Control and 5 cm or 15 and 30 cm) were rarely statistically different. The rate of decline was inﬂuenced by seed volume, with the largest-sized grain, maize, showing the smallest reduction in the number of holes (AEH and LAH) relative to the control group (30% and 24%, respectively). Sorghum had the greatest reduction in AEH (52%), while sesame showed the greatest decline for LAH (58%). Multivariate regression analysis found no signiﬁcant interaction effects between grain depth and seed volume for AEH. Two-way ANOVA determined that dry grain mass increased with increasing barrier depth (Fig. 5c). A dry sample of 100 cowpeas weighs approximately 20 g. Control group samples weighed between 15.47 g (sorghum) and 17.58 g (sesame), while cowpea stored beneath 50 cm barriers weighed between 17.98 g (sorghum) and 19.09 g (sesame). This corresponds to a 5e14% increase in grain mass. However, seed depth was the only signiﬁcant factor that inﬂuenced these observations and seed volume was not a relevant, explanatory factor.
S.B. Williams et al. / Journal of Stored Products Research 69 (2016) 65e71
Fig. 4. Bruchid (a) Adult Emergence Holes (AEH) are distinguished by their large size relative to the size of the cowpea and regular, round shape. They are formed as the adult beetle leaves the seed. The (b) Larval Air Holes (LAH) are smaller in size and less regular in shape. These holes are formed as a result of stress caused by a decrease in the available oxygen.
Fig. 5. Effect of barrier depth and type of grain used on the severity of damage recorded from samples of infested cowpea. Bars that share letters were not statistically different in value at the a ¼ 0.05 level. The number of emergence holes (a) and air holes (b) relative to the initial infestation rates were signiﬁcantly inﬂuenced by both the volume of grain covering the inlet hole to the 10 cm pipes and the kernel size of the grain. The mass of each 100 seed sample (c) was also negatively affected by the volume of grain and the size of the individual kernels.
S.B. Williams et al. / Journal of Stored Products Research 69 (2016) 65e71 Table 3 Results of Two-way ANOVA comparing the effect of grain depth and seed volume on seed damage.
4. Discussion Earlier research has observed an inverse relationship between grain depth and the severity of damage inﬂicted on stored grain by insect pests (Simwat and Chahal, 1980; Martin et al., 2015). Our study conﬁrms that as the distance between the site of an insect infestation and the outside air increases, there is a proportional decrease in the number of AEH observed in our 10 cm pipes. Shallow barriers of grain (5 cm), for example, did not signiﬁcantly reduce the number of emerging adults relative to our control groups for both maize and sesame. But as the depth of these barriers increased from 15 to 50 cm, we observed the number of AEH decline proportionally. Average seed volume also inﬂuenced AEH numbers, but there was not a clear relationship between these two variables. Maize and sesame (50 cm) barriers both had a 30e32% reduction in AEH counts (relative to our controls), but sorghum had the highest reduction at 50 percent. Because sorghum is intermediate in size relative to our other two grain types, we speculate that this unexpected result is an artifact of the high, initial infestation rate of the sorghum trial. The larger number of insects present in the sorghum control group may have caused the grain barrier to appear more effective, as we would naturally see more signs of damage in the control group pipes. Without this higher infestation level, we may have observed reductions in AEH number closer to what we observed in our maize and sesame trials. Excluding sorghum from our comparison revealed that while average seed volume remained a signiﬁcant factor, its effect was very small and likely did not contribute much to the number of AEH observed. Other signs of damage, such as LAH numbers, were also affected by grain depth. Additionally, there was a clearer relationship between LAH counts and average seed volume than between AEH and seed volume. Barriers made of the smaller-sized sesame (4 mm3) caused up to 58% reduction in LAH values. Meanwhile, the largesized maize (170 mm3) reduced the number of holes by only a 24%. Sorghum (54 mm3) fell somewhere in between with a 43% reduction in the number of LAH. How our grain barriers reduce insect damage and why they inﬂuence some aspects of insect damage to stored grain (LAH) more than others (AEH, seed weight) requires us to consider two factors: (1) the oxygen requirements of developing bruchids and (2) the movement of gases through the bulk grain. The combination of these two factors determines the amount of environmental stress experienced by the bruchid population in our infested 10 cm pipes. Oxygen needs of our bruchid populations likely changed during the 72 d trial. We estimate that the ﬁrst-generation populations within the 10 cm pipes ranged in number between 123 and 216 insects. This estimate is based on the average number of cowpeas (435) in each 10 cm pipe and infestation rate reported for our trials.
Larval bruchids will consume 8.5 mL of oxygen over their developmental cycle (Murdock et al., 2012). This means that these ﬁrstgeneration populations would need between 75 and 131 mL of oxygen per day to develop normally. The 10 cm pipes are too small to contain the oxygen needed for development, even for a day. Assuming that 39% of the volume in these pipes is air (Kabas et al., 2007; Davies and Zibokere, 2011) and that 20% of that air is oxygen, we estimate that the 10 cm pipes could only contain about 9 mL of oxygen. This volume is only about 7e12% of the populations’ estimated daily needs and is therefore insufﬁcient for development (Murdock et al., 2012). Even if the insects adjust their respiration rates to use less oxygen (Murdock et al., 2012; Oxley and Wickenden, 1963), these populations still require oxygen from outside the pipe in order to survive. These constraints only become more severe as the bruchid larvae develop towards adulthood. Under normal conditions, a female bruchid can lay ~40 eggs during her lifetime. Assuming that half of the emerging adults are female and that only half of each female’s eggs hatch, we would still see a rapid increase in population size; from 120 to 216 beetles to 1200e2160. This higher number of insects requires larger volumes of air to sustain itself. Instead of a few hundred milliliters per day, these secondgeneration populations require 1.5e2.5 L of oxygen each day. Moving such large volumes of oxygen through grain via diffusion becomes increasingly difﬁcult as grain depth increases. A number of studies have looked at the movement of gases through grain, most often using maize, which we can use as a model for the other barrier grains. Previous research focused primarily on carbon dioxide (44.01 g/mol) diffusion through grain, but we can use this data to approximate the oxygen (32 g/mol) diffusion rates as both molecules are similar in mass. (Singh et al., 1984; Shunmugam et al., 2005; Haung et al., 2013; Haugh and Isaacs, 1967). We use the published data and the equation
. t ¼ x2 2D
to estimate how quickly carbon dioxide and oxygen move through our barriers. The variable t represents the elapsed time since diffusion began, x is the depth of our grain barrier, and D is the diffusion coefﬁcient, Singh et al. (1984) calculated the diffusion coefﬁcient of carbon dioxide through maize as 3.02 mm2/s, while Haugh and Isaacs (1967) estimated a slightly faster rate at 5.77 mm2/s. Using Graham’s Law and the molecular masses of the two gases, we estimate that oxygen diffuses through the grain about 17% faster than carbon dioxide (range 3.53e6.75 mm2/s). Using these diffusion coefﬁcients, we can estimate that a molecule of carbon dioxide or oxygen could pass through our 5 cm barrier of maize in about 3e6 min. Such a short amount of time to diffuse would not place signiﬁcant stress on our bruchid population, especially for the ﬁrst generation. However, the time required for both gases to pass through the grain barrier increases as the square of the length of the barrier. Instead of a few minutes, it would take a molecule of oxygen or carbon dioxide 5e10 h to pass through our 50 cm barrier of maize. For the ﬁrst generation of bruchids, this amount of time for the gases to move through the barrier would not be a signiﬁcant constraint, but the greater needs of the second generation creates greater pressure on the system. Based on estimates provided by Bailey (1959), it would only take about an hour for the 150e260 mL of carbon dioxide produced by the ﬁrst generation of bruchids to pass through the 50 cm maize barrier. However, the second generation produces more carbon dioxide and needs more oxygen. Moving this volume of gas in and out of the 10 cm pipes could take more than a day, during which, more oxygen is consumed and
S.B. Williams et al. / Journal of Stored Products Research 69 (2016) 65e71
Table 4 Estimated daily CO2 production of barrier grains by volume and amount produced relative to carbon dioxide respired by C. maculatus populations in 10 cm pipes. Depth (cm) Sesame mL/day Grain/insects (%) Sorghum mL/day Grain/insects (%) Maize mL/day Grain/insects (%)
0.003 (0.001, 0.003)
0.01 (0.004, 0.008)
0.02 (0.01, 0.013)
0.03 (0.012, 0.025)
0.08 (0.031, 0.053)
0.26 (0.1, 0.17)
0.51 (0.2, 0.34)
0.85 (0.33, 0.57)
0.02 (0.01, 0.013)
0.07 (0.027, 0.047)
0.12 (0.046, 0.08)
0.2 (0.077, 0.13)
carbon dioxide is produced. The local environment would build a high concentration of carbon dioxide within and just above the 10 cm pipes. The result is a gradient of carbon dioxide and oxygen within the grain barrier. Even as carbon dioxide concentrations increase, the movement of the gas through the grain is independent of the gas’s concentration (Bird et al., 1960; Pritchard and Currie, 1982; Shunmugam et al., 2005), creating a positive feedback loop. This high CO2/low O2 balance would result in slower larval development within our 10 cm pipes, if not leading to the deaths of these insects during development. The effect would be greater on our second generation population than the ﬁrst, due to their greater oxygen requirements. Many of the AEHs are likely the product of the ﬁrst generation of bruchids. Meanwhile, few beetle larval in the second generation succeeded in reaching maturity and likely produced the greater number of LAH versus adult emergence holes observed in our trials. Other factors such as temperature and grain moisture (Bailey, 1959, Singh et al., 1984; Shunmugam et al., 2005; Haung et al., 2013; Haugh and Isaacs, 1967) play a role in this complex system. Changes in temperature have been observed to make insects respire faster or slower in response (Coﬁe-Agblor et al., 1996; Neven, 2000). This would make restrictions in oxygen diffusion by the grain more or less intense, as the insects’ metabolic rates change accordingly. Higher moisture would also decrease the severity of low-oxygen as the insects would be less prone to drying out (Navarro, 1978; Murdock et al., 2012; Murdock and Bauoa, 2014). For our study, though, we limited the inﬂuence of temperature and moisture from our trials to narrow the focus on just the effect the grain barrier’s depth and composition had on the system. Another factor to consider is respiration by the barrier grains. We note that grain respiration consumes and produces a negligible amount of oxygen and carbon dioxide (on the order of mg/mL/day), respectively. This process is signiﬁcantly less than what we estimated is produced by the insects (Table 4). As the amount of carbon dioxide produced by our barrier grains is less than 1% of that produced by our insects, we can rule it out as an inﬂuencing factor for our system. The fact that our maize barrier was the lowest-performing barrier for suppressing pest damage of our three barrier grains conﬁrms the importance of grain size/shape in reducing gas diffusion. The studies cited above pointed out that greater grain size (i.e., volume) leads to a more porous bulk density, which allows gases to ﬂow more freely. This may aid in understanding how PICS bags work, and may assist in identifying which crops are more vulnerable to damage when the liner is compromised. Commodities that allow larger airspaces and greater freedom for gases to ﬂow, like cassava chips (Hell et al., 2014) may be more vulnerable after bag damage than ones with higher resistance to gas ﬂow, like sesame and sorghum.
Acknowledgements This research did not receive any speciﬁc grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-proﬁt sectors.
References Baributsa, D., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., Murdock, L., Moussa, B., 2010. Proﬁtable chemical-free cowpea storage technology for smallholder farmers in Africa: opportunities and challenges. In: 10th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, vol. 425. Julius-Kühn-Archiv, pp. 1046e1052. Baributsa, D., 2014. Market building for post-harvest technology through largescale extension efforts. J. Stored Prod. Res. 58, 59e66. Bailey, S.W., 1959. The rate of diffusion of oxygen through grain. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 10, 501e506. Baoua, I.B., Baoua, I.B., Amadou, L., Ousmane, B., Baributsa, D., Murdock, L.L., 2014. PICS bags for post-harvest storage of maize grain in West Africa. J. Stored Prod. Res. 58, 20e28. Boxall. 2002. Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., Lightfoot, E.N., 1960. Transport Phenomena. Wiley, New York. Boxall, R.A., 2002. Damage and loss caused by the larger grain borer. Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 7, 105e121. Coﬁe-Agblor, R., Muir, W.E., Zhang, Q., Sinha, R.N., 1996. Heat of respiration of Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens) adults and larvae in stored wheat. Can. Agric. Eng. 38 (1), 37-44. Davies, R.M., Zibokere, D.S., 2011. Effect of moisture content on some physical and mechanical properties of three varieties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) walp). Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 13 (1), 1e8. Haung, H., Danao, M.C., Rausch, K.D., Singh, V., 2013. Diffusion and production of carbon dioxide in bulk corn at various temperatures and moisture content. J. Stored Prod. Res. 55, 21e26. Haugh, G.G., Isaacs, G.W., 1967. Isothermal diffusion of oxygen in grain mass. In: Transactions of the ASAE. Paper no. 66e413. Hell, K., Ognakossan, E., Lamboni, Y., 2014. PICS hermetic storage bags ineffective in controlling infestations of Prostephanus truncatus and Dinoderus spp. in traditional cassava chips. J. Stored Prod. Res. 58, 53e58. Ibro, G., Sorgho, M.C., Idris, A.A., Moussa, B., Baributsa, D., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., 2014. Adoption of cowpea hermetic storage by women in Nigeria, Niger, and Burkina Faso. J. Stored Prod. Res. 58, 87e96. Jones, M., Alexander, C., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., 2011. In: An Initial Investigation of the Potential for Hermetic Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS) Bags to Improve Incomes for Maize Producers in Sub-saharan Africa. Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University, p. 44. Working Paper #11-3. Kabas, O., Yilmaz, E., Ozmerzi, A., Akinci, I., 2007. Some physical and nutritional properties of cowpea seed (Vigna sinensis L.). J. Food Eng. 79 (4), 1405e1409. Keil, H., 1988. Losses caused by the larger grain borer in farm stored maize. In: Schulten, G.M., Toet, A.J. (Eds.), Report II, Technical Papers Presented at the Workshop on the Containment and Control of the Larger Grain Borer, Arusha, Tanzania, 16-21 May, 1988, pp. 28e52. Martin, D., Baributsa, D., Huesing, J.E., Williams, S.B., Murdock, L.L., 2015. PICS bags protect wheat grain, Triticum aestivvum (L.), against rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 63, 22e30. Moussa, B., Abdoulaye, T., Coulibaly, O., Baributsa, D., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., 2014. Adoption of on-farm hermetic storage for cowpea in west and central Africa in 2012. J. Stored Prod. Res. 58, 77e86. Mulungu, L.S., Lupenza, G., Reuben, S.O.W.M., Misangu, R.N., 2007. Evaluation of botanical products as stored grain protectant against maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamays (L.) on maize. J. Entomol. 4 (3), 258e262. Murdock, L.L., Margam, V., Baoua, I., Balfe, S., Shade, R.E., 2012. Death by desiccation: effects of hermetic storage on cowpea bruchids. J. Stored Prod. Res. 49, 166e170.
S.B. Williams et al. / Journal of Stored Products Research 69 (2016) 65e71 Murdock, L.L., Bauoa, I.B., 2014. On Purdue Improved Cowpea Storage (PICS) technology: background, mode of action, future prospects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 58, 3e11. Mwithiga, G., Sifuna, M.M., 2006. Effect of moisture content on the physical properties of three varieties of sorghum seeds. J. Food Eng. 75, 480e486. Navarro, S., 1978. The effect of low oxygen tensions on three stored product insect pest. Phytoparasitica 6 (2), 51e58. Neven, L.G., 2000. Physiological responses of insects to heat. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 21, 103e111. Njoroge, A.W., Affognon, H.D., Mutungi, C.M., Manono, J., Lamuka, P.O., Murdock, L.L., 2014. Triple bag hermetic storage delivers a lethal punch to Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in stored maize. J. Stored Prod. Res. 58, 12e19. Oxley, T.A., Wickenden, G., 1963. The effect of restricted air supply on some insects which infest grain. Ann. Appl. Biol. 51, 313e324. Pantenius, C.U., 1988. Storage losses in traditional maize granaries in Togo. Insect Sci. Appl. 9 (6), 725e735.
Pritchard, D.T., Currie, J.A., 1982. Diffusion coeffcients of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, ethylene, and ethane in air and their measurement. J. Soil Sci. 33, 175e184. Quezada, M.Y., Moreno, J., Vazquez, M.E., Mendoza, M., Mendez-Albores, A., Moreno-Martinez, E., 2006. Hermetic storage system preventing the proliferation of Prostephanus truncatus horn and storage fungi in maize with different moisture contents. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 39 (3), 321e326. Singh, D., Muir, W.E., Sinha, R.N., 1984. Apparent coefﬁcient of diffusion of carbon dioxide through samples of cereals and rapeseed. J. Stored Prod. Res. 20 (3),169e175. Simwat, G.S., Chahal, B.S., 1980. Effect of storage period and depth of stored grains on the insect population and the resultant loss of stored wheat with the farmers. Bull. Grain Technol. 18 (1), 35e41. Shunmugam, G., Jayas, D.S., White, N.D.G., Muir, W.E., 2005. Diffusion of carbon dioxide through grain bulks. J. Stored Prod. Res. 41, 131e144. Tarighi, J., Mahmoudi, A., Alavi, N., 2011. Some mechanical and physical properties of corn seed (Var. DCC 370). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6 (16), 3691e3699. Tunde-Akintunde, T.Y., Akintunder, B.O., 2004. Some physical properties of sesame seed. Biosyst. Eng. 88 (1), 127e129.