Lastly, my BW Rena saw hun- dreds of pages strewn ...... just as in fixed-wing air- craft. Historically, airships such as the Graf Zeppelin were often hit by light- .... In fact, the time spent on the ground allows for repair and adjust- ment of the
Apr 1, 2018 - USAF, Chief, Systems Engineering, Air Force Space Laser Communications Program, ... Los Angeles Air Force Station, California 90009.
In this paper we introduce a form of free-space laser communications involving a source operating on several ... Keywords: Free-space optical communications, direct detection, multiple wavelength, atmospheric turbulence ..... 5: PDFs of the normalize
10 Gbit/s, commercially available devices developed for terrestrial fiber optic applications may be ... receivers in the multi-Gigabit/s range: optically preamplified direct detection receivers and .... power S and as photons per bit, nS, vs. optical
Keywords Laser communication, Optical communication, Free-space, Space communication, GOLCE2010 .... Station (ISS), which is called the Space-QUEST.
of the Department of the Air Force under Contract F19628-76-C-0002. This report may be reproduced ... Journal Article. JA No. ..... gram was concluded with a five-stage amplifier demonstration which delivered 2.60 W power output at 20 GHz ...
tional capabilities with real-time telemetry and control to and from shore, enabling operators or scientists to make real-time decisions for certain tasks (e.g., sample collection) and to determine high-level mission definition and coordination. Mode
channel and system: the Optical Ground Station Oberpfaffenhofen and the Transportable Optical ... experiments, as e.g. for links to ESA's ARTEMIS satellite .
8-4. 8-II. 9-3. 9-4. 9-10. Page v. Satellite. Development and Manufacturing. Schedule. 10-8 ...... degradation resulting from amplifier failure in a phased array, makes the array-based ..... geometry foreach reflectorisshown inFigure3-2. ...... outdo
Network Protocol (SCPS-NP) at the Network layer (OSI Layer 3) provides ... In general, Internet protocols such as TCP/IP (including FTP and UDP) are designed ...
such a system for evolution of the Deep Space Network (DSN) beyond the year 2000 and develop satellite designs that would provide 10-dB telemetry improvement over projected 70-m. Ka-band performance [4, 5]. At the same time, JPL conducted a largely i
GSAW 2001. 1. Space Mission. Communications Security. Nick Shave, Gavin Kenny. Logica UK Limited. Howard Weiss. SPARTA Inc. James Stanier. DERA ...
mission is designed as a âtechnology ... source. Figure 2: Scale representation of a 3U CubeSat ... used on TechEdSat, a 1U CubeSat designed at. San Jose ...
Jun 13, 2002 - https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp? ... NASA STI Program Office provides access to the ..... Remote Spacecraft Access and Control Technique.
Feb 23, 2017 - momentum (OAM) multiplexing link by using self-healing Bessel beams ... such set is orbital angular momentum (OAM)8. .... grating period is small enough, limited by the size of optical elements, such beam will be obstructed. .... 4 Ã
Aug 15, 2005 - receivers is used for providing a data service from deep space, site ... to 3 percent of a Martian year by designing a ground station that can .... 23-km visibility range; and rural aerosol with sub-visual cirrus, 5-km visibility range
MZI optical modulators as used as âmixersâ for downconversion. MOEMS as the crossconnect switch. EDFAs for high splitting ration in LO distribution ...
A Telecom Satellite can vary from being a classical Analog Repeater (âtransponderâ) to a full Digital ... Optical distribution of a microwave LO requires extremely low phase noise analog .... _whitePaper_satelliteDataServices.pdf. N.Karafolas ...
heaven"? There are many reasons, the most important of which are as follows: ... lessons therein that are still of great relevance today and are all-too-often ...
Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index ... publisher of Open Access books .... Free Space Optical Communications â Theory and Practices ..... damaÎ¼e human skin, but the part oÎ» the human body most susceptible to lasers is the .
Analysis of a Ground to Satellite Optical Link with a Cooperative Satellite Beacon ... communications link between a ground station and an orbiting satellite can ...
2005 648pp 221 illustrations 295 exercises. 978 0 521 83716 3 ... homework exercises. â¢ Solutions manual available for instructors. Contents: 1. Introduction and overview; 2. Characteristics of the mobile radio environment â propagation phenomena
with SIP, Bluetooth, and J2EEâ¢ and describe our experiences ... Bluetooth endpoints as they move throughout the coverage area. ... Enterprise IT (e.g. printers,.
system for an scenario which consists of a High-Altitude aeronautical Platform (HAP) ... it could replace or support the terrestrial network, avoiding problems with ...
Space Laser Communications: Systems, Technologies, and Applications Walter R. LEEB Institut für Nachrichtentechnik und Hochfrequenztechnik, Technische Universität Wien, Gusshausstrasse 25/389, A-1040 Wien, Austria
Abstract: Laser communication links in space are attractive alternatives to present-day microwave links. This tutorial describes the basic concept and the functions of an optical terminal on board a spacecraft. It points out the differences between free-space optical links on one hand and glass fiber systems and microwave directional links on the other hand. The requirements on data transmitters and receivers as well as on optical antennas and pointing, acquisition and tracking mechanisms are discussed. Typical application scenarios are outlined, experimental systems and their technologies are cited.
Key Words: laser communications, free space, intersatellite links, space communication, space networks
requirements for and the available technologies to implement transmitters, receivers, optical antennas, as well as the PAT system (PAT...pointing, acquisition, and tracking). Next we sketch application scenarios, and we conclude with both a glimpse onto past and future system technologies.
Communication technology has experienced a continual development to higher and higher carrier frequencies, starting from a few hundred kilohertz at Marconi's time to several hundred terahertz since we employ lasers in fiber systems. The main driving force was that the usable bandwidth - and hence transmission capacity - increases proportional to the carrier frequency. Another asset comes into play in free-space point-to-point links. The minimum divergence obtainable with a freely propagating beam of electromagnetic waves scales proportional to the wavelength. The jump from microwaves to light waves therefore means a reduction in beamwidth by orders of magnitude, even if we use transmit antennas of much smaller diameter. The reduced beamwidth does not only imply increased intensity at the receiver site but also reduced cross talk between closely operating links and less chance for eavesdropping. Space communication, as employed in satellite-tosatellite links, is traditionally performed using microwaves. For more than twenty five years, however, laser systems are being investigated as alternatives. 1-3) One hopes that mass, power consumption, and size of an optical transceiver module will be smaller than that of a microwave transceiver. Also, fuel consumption for satellite attitude control when quickly re-directing antennas should be less for optical antennas. On the other hand, a new set of problems had to be addressed in connection with the extreme requirements for pointing, acquiring, and tracking the narrow-width laser beams. In this tutorial we will first discuss the basics of an optical free space link (Sect. 2) and then point out the differences to terrestrial fiber systems and to microwave links in Sect. 3. Section 4 presents the
2. System Layout A scenario typical for the transmission system in question asks for point-to-point data transfer between two spacecraft (see Fig. 1). The distances to be bridged may extend anywhere from a few hundred kilometers to 70 000 km (e.g. in near-earth applications) up to millions of kilometers in case of signals transmitted by a space probe.4) Today the data rates in mind range from several hundred kbit/s to some 10 Gbit/s. Terminals for optical communication in space are mostly designed for bi-directional links, at least concerning the optical tracking function. They comprise both a transmitter and a receiver that generally share the optical antenna. Another peculiarity is the necessity of beam steering (or pointing) capability with sub-microradian angular resolution and possibly with an angular coverage exceeding a hemisphere. These requirements lead to a transceiver block diagram as shown in Fig. 2. The light source S is a laser, preferably operating in a single transverse mode in order to achieve the highest possible antenna gain. If the laser operates continuously or in a pulsed mode producing a periodic pulse train, an external modulator (M) is utilized to impress the data signal onto the beam. Alternatively, internal modulation may be employed with some lasers. The modulated beam passes an optical duplexer (DUP) and a fine pointing assembly (FPA) before it enters a telescope acting as
alignment between transmission and reception (see Sect. 3.2). It should be stressed that the block diagram of Fig. 2 shows only a basic outline and that it may be modified in several respects. Among such modifications are: – the provision of separate laser sources to generate extra beams for acquisition and for tracking (beacon lasers), – separate antennas for the outgoing and the incoming beam, – means to deliberately increase the divergence of the beam used as beacon in order to illuminate the opposite terminal during the acquisition process, – the provision of separate photodetectors for acquisition and for tracking, or the use of a single photodetector for data detection, acquisition, and tracking, – the installation of an optical booster amplifier to increase the output power. In any case, the task of engineering a laser terminal may be divided into three major complexes, namely – one covering the data transmission aspects, – one providing for pointing, acquiring and tracking (PAT) the very narrow laser beams, – and one of designing space-qualifiable optomechanical structures and proper interfacing with the spacecraft platform. While each of them requires a sophisticated concept, it should be stressed here that the problems associated with PAT are generally underestimated.
Fig. 1 A scenario of laser communication links in space. TRANSMIT DATA
S M OUT
CPA POINT AHEAD INPUT
DE RECEIVED DATA
ACQUISITION SEQUENCE INITIALISTATION
OPTICAL BEAM ELECTRICAL CONNECTION
Fig. 2 Block diagram of optical transceiver for space-to-space links (S..laser source, M..modulator, DUP..optical duplexer, FPA..fine pointing assembly, ANT..antenna, CPA..coarse pointing assembly, PAA..point ahead assembly, BS..beam splitter, DD..data detector, DE..data electronics, ATD..acquisition and tracking detector, ATE..acquisition and tracking electronics).
3. Peculiarities Some of the readers may be more familiar with fiber-based optical transmission systems, others with conventional satellite links employing microwaves. The following two sections serve to point out basic differences of laser space communications with these systems. 3.1 Differences to fiber systems While in fiber systems dispersion and non-linearity is a major concern, no such effects exist for the free space channel. Coupling the transmit signal into the channel - which is free space - requires an antenna, usually in the form of a telescope. Further, background radiation - e.g. caused by the Sun - may pose a problem, and, of course, no in-line amplifiers or regenerators can be implemented. If a space link is to sustain data transmission in both directions simultaneously and if the terminal has only a single antenna, a duplexing element must separate the transmit and the receive beam in the transceiver (see Fig.2). The degree of isolation it has to provide for the transmit beam not to reach the own terminal's data receiver is quite large: For a transmit power of 500mW and a receive power of 5 nW, the degree of isolation should clearly exceed 90 dB to make cross talk negligible. Extremely low stray light
transmit antenna (ANT). The telescope increases the beam diameter and thus reduces the beam divergence. A coarse pointing assembly (CPA) provides for steering the antenna. The received radiation also passes the antenna and the fine pointing assembly, and is then directed to the receive part of the terminal with the aid of the duplexer. A beam splitter (BS) directs one part of the received beam to the data detector (DD) for demodulation and further signal processing in the data electronics unit (DE). Another part of the received power is used for controlling the fine and coarse pointing mechanisms in such a way that the acquisition and tracking detector (ATD) is always hit centrally. A point-ahead assembly (PAA) has to be inserted in either the transmit path or the receive path to allow electronic control of the internal angular
levels of the duplexer are an essential prerequisite. Duplexers can be based on spectral discrimination (i.e. filtering), on polarization diversity, or on both. Hence a common suggestion is to use left hand and right hand circularly polarized light for the two directions, respectively. This also makes the transmission insensitive against rotation of the terminals along their antenna axes. Because polarization duplexing will provide only some 15 dB of isolation, wavelength duplexing must be designed into the system in any case. For the general case that both terminals experience a relative velocity along the line-of-sight, vD, the Doppler effect will yield a frequency shift ∆f in the received signal. As long as vD << c (c ... velocity of light), one has ∆f = vD/λ where λ is the carrier wavelength. In a LEO-GEO* link, vD may amount up to some ± 8⋅103 m/s. Because of the small wavelength, the resulting Doppler shift is large and amounts up to ± 7.5 GHz at λ = 1.06 µm for the example cited. Such a large frequency shift might be negligible in a direct detection receiver (as long as no extremely narrow optical filtering is applied). In a heterodyne receiver,** however, the frequency shift has to be compensated by either tuning the local laser oscillator, by tuning the electrical oscillator in a second intermediate frequency stage, or by both. In space applications - even more than in undersea fiber systems - reliability and lifetime is of special importance. As examples, the laser source itself or a (cooled) detector may represent a weak point concerning reliability and thus require redundancy. Other subunits, like the telescope or the coarse pointing assembly may be too bulky and present such a high fraction of the mass budget that a single failure point is accepted in their case.
to align the antenna axes, some mispointing will persist and the receive intensity will vary statistically. To a first approximation, the antenna gains GT, GR are related to the diameters of the (circular) transmit and receive antenna, DT, DR as
Substituting (2) into (1) reveals the 1/λ2-dependence of receive power PR which makes the optical regime so attractive compared to microwaves. Equation (2) is applicable in case of diffraction limited antenna operation. The full beam divergence then obtained is on the order of
The very small beamwidths θ at optical frequencies (some 5 µrad for typical values of λ and DT) are, of course, the reason for the high antenna gain achievable (some 115 dB). However, this advantage is not gained for free: Establishing and maintaining contact with extremely narrow beams is a tough task, especially if transmitter and receiver change their relative position (see Sect. 4.4). One critical aspect of intersatellite laser communications with narrow beams results from the need to introduce a point ahead angle. Because of the finite velocity of light (c) and the relative angular velocity of two communication terminals moving in space, the transmit beam must be directed towards the receiver's position it will have at some later time. This point ahead angle is given by 5)
3.2 Differences to microwave systems At a first glance, the equation governing the amount of power received in an optical directional link, PR, is the same as one knows from microwave links, namely
2 vR , c
where vR is the relative velocity component of transmitter and receiver, orthogonal to the line-ofsight, as illustrated in Fig. 3. Point ahead is generally required in both dimensions. It amounts up to 40 µrad for a GEO-GEO link and up to 70 µrad for a LEOGEO link and may thus be appreciably larger than the beamwidth. The point ahead angle can be introduced in either the receive or the transmit path of each transceiver and must be adjustable if vR varies with time. It is difficult to design a control loop for automatic adjustment of point ahead. Therefore today's concepts rely on the calculation of point ahead angles from known ephemeris data and on open loop implementation.
λ PR = PT G T G R LT LR LP . 4 πR
πD T ,R = λ
Here PT is the optical output power generated at the transmitter, GT and GR are the gain values of the transmit and receive antenna, λ is the carrier wavelength, R the distance between the terminals and the factors LT and LR cover the loss within the transmit and receive terminal. However, the last factor, LP, which accounts for loss caused by non-ideal pointing, may correspond to several dB in a free-space laser link: Because of the extremely small beamwidths involved in optical links, transmit and receive antenna will, in general, not yield their maximum gain. Despite the implementation of an active tracking control loop
4. Requirements and technology 4.1 Data transmitter The main parameters characterizing the optical source are wavelength, output power, transverse mode,
LEO..low earth orbiting (satellite), GEO..geostationary (satellite), see also Sect. 5 see Sect. 4.2
modulation would require n = 5.6 photons/bit.*** To what extent this quantum limit is reached in practice depends on the engineer’s ability to make negligible the effect of other noise contributions, as there is – excess noise in avalanche photodiodes (APDs), – optical preamplifier noise (amplified spontaneous emission), – transistor noise and circuit noise in the receiver electronics, – laser phase noise, – transmit-receive cross coupling, – background radiation. Today direct receivers employing APDs can be used up to 2.5 Gbit/s. Their sensitivity is determined by electronic and by multiplication noise and may be less than 100 photons/bit at low data rates.6) With optical preamplification by an Erbium-doped fiber amplifier, direct receivers have shown sensitivities of 40 photons/bit at 10 Gbit/s.7) With coherent reception, the received optical field is transposed into the electrical regime (intermediate frequency, IF) by mixing it with the field of a local laser oscillator.8) A photodetector serves as mixer element. Information is preserved not only about amplitude but also about frequency and phase of the received field, hence frequency and phase modulated ✝ optical signals can be detected, too. As optical mixers have sensitive areas with dimensions large compared to the wavelength, in the optical regime the spatial modes of received and local field have to be matched to obtain maximum IF signal. Matching requires identical polarization and asks for equal amplitude and phase distribution, the latter two optimized with respect to the mixer element. Coherent receivers perfectly reject radiation from other than the nominal input direction. Equally well they discriminate against unwanted spectral components by their IF filter. Therefore they are a priori less sensitive against background radiation and ✝✝ cross talk. An experimental heterodyne receiver with phase shift keying at 565 Mbit/s has demonstrated a sensitivity of 22 photons/bit.9)
L t0 s1
t 0 - Lc
s2 t 0 + Lc
Fig. 3 Point ahead angle β for space craft S1 and S2 that have a relative velocity component vR orthogonal to the line of sight. Shown with dotted lines: position of S2 at time instants indicated (L..distance, c..velocity of light). polarization, linewidth, and modulation capability. A smaller wavelength requires increased surface quality of optical elements which in turn asks for bulkier devices if diffraction limited operation is essential. Thus the mass of the antenna (and hence the load for the coarse pointing assembly) is strongly influenced by the choice of λ. Also, the wavelength dependence of the sensitivity of available optical receivers must be considered. The output power will have to be in the range of 100 mW and 1 W, depending on the link distance and data rate. It should be available in a single transverse mode to achieve maximum on-axis antenna gain, and in a single longitudinal mode to obtain optimum spectral efficiency. For coherent reception, phase noise is detrimental and thus a narrow linewidth of both the transmitter laser and the local laser oscillator in the receiver is required. The usually linear state of polarization emitted by the laser source is to be converted into circular polarization before the beam leaves the terminal (see Sect. 3.1). Modulation may be achieved directly (e.g. in case of diode lasers and moderate data rates) or with an external modulator. Especially in connection with a subsequent optical booster amplifier, the insertion loss introduced by an electro-optic or acousto-optic modulator may be tolerable. As with fiber systems, binary modulation formats are envisaged for space links. In connection with a coherent receiver, phase shift keying (and possibly frequency shift keying) is an attractive alternative to on-off keying, as it makes better use of the carrier power.
4.3 Antennas The transmit antenna is essentially a telescope which magnifies the diameter of the beam emitted by the laser (or by a booster amplifier). This beam is generally well modeled by a Gaussian intensity distribution. The antenna will not only introduce truncation via its finite diameter DT but may also cause some central obscuration, depending on the telescope's construction. These two effects reduce the ideal onaxis antenna gain given by equ. (2) by typically 1.5
4.2 Data receiver For space applications, good receiver sensitivity is an extremely valuable asset, not at least because no inline amplification is possible. It is often characterized by the minimum number of input photons per bit to achieve a bit error probability of 10-6. If other sources of noise than that due to the quantum nature of radiation are negligible, a direct detection receiver needs n = 6.6 photons/bit. As an example for a coherent receiver, a homodyne receiver with PSK
In both cases binary signaling and equally probable marks and zeros are assumed. For high-data rate frequency-shifted and differential-phase-shifted signals, optical demodulation in combination with a direct receiver is feasible, too. ✝✝ The same degree of spatial and spectral filtering is obtained with a direct receiver equipped with a singlemode spatial filter (e.g. a fiber preamplifier) and an optical filter matched to the data spectrum. ✝
dB.10) The antenna pattern resembles that of an Airy pattern. Alignment tolerances of the optical elements constituting the telescope are usually very tight, as the output beam has to be perfectly collimated for maximum gain. The main specifications of the optical antenna are: diameter of primary mirror (or lens), magnification, aberrations, wavelength dependence of throughput, sensitivity to temperature changes and gradients, and stray light level. Usually, refractive telescopes are envisaged in case of small diameters while reflective systems are preferred for diameters exceeding several centimeters. With increasing antenna aperture it becomes more and more difficult (and expensive) to meet specifications. Large antennas will also increase the mass and size of an optical transceiver considerably, as the telescope and the coarse pointing assembly do contribute appreciably to these characteristics. Presently it is felt that the diameter of diffraction limited antennas should not exceed some 25 cm for free-space laser links. Coarse pointing may be accomplished via gimbal mounting the antenna or by a separate unit consisting of two orthogonally mounted steering mirrors or one gimbaled reflector.
sufficient optical power for the acquisition and the tracking process must be received. 5. Application scenarios One of the first scenarios considered was a bidirectional, symmetric link between two geostationary satellites (GEOs). The orbital distance between the GEO satellites may lie anywhere between a few degrees and some 120°, corresponding to distances between a few thousand kilometers and 75 000 km (see Fig. 4a). Such a link has the attractive features of a single (or very seldom) acquisition process, of a nominally zero Doppler shift, and of low angular tracking velocities. Connections to ground stations could be performed with microwaves. GEO1 LASER µW µW
4.4 Pointing, acquisition, and tracking. To establish an optical link in space, a sophisticated spatial pointing and acquisition procedure must be initiated. Information on the position of the two space terminals has to be available. Still, because of position uncertainty and incomplete knowledge of the spacecraft's orientation (attitude uncertainty), one terminal's beam width has to be widened deliberately as to illuminate the second terminal despite the uncertainty in position. A spatial search operation by the (narrow beam) receive path of the second, and subsequently, of the first terminal have to follow before acquisition is completed and switching to the tracking mode can occur. Wide-fieldof-view acquisition detectors in the form CCDs are most helpful. During data transmission, the angle between the line-of-sight and the transmit beam axis must be kept to within a fraction of the transmit beamwidth θ which may be as small as a few µrad. To maintain sufficient alignment of the transmit and receive antennas despite platform vibrations, both terminals have to be equipped with a tracking servo loop. Optical beacons have to be provided in both directions to render input information for the control loops. The data carrying beams themselves may serve as beacon, or separate optical beams may be implemented, e.g. in a one-way link. Tracking should ensure a mispointing of typically less than 1 µrad. Whenever the tracking loop signals optimum receive position, the transmitted beam (or beacon) will be correctly directed to the opposite terminal. This would require a perfect coaxial alignment for the optical transmit and receive path within each transceiver. However, some bias, or point ahead angle, has in general to be introduced into the alignment, as was discussed in Sect. 3.2. To ensure short acquisition time and adequate tracking accuracy,
Fig. 4 Two geostationary satellites (GEO1, GEO2) are connected by a laser duplex link (a). A low-earth orbiting satellite (LEO) transmits data via a laser link to a GEO acting as data relay (b). In both cases the downlink is via microwaves (µW). Large data streams generated on a low-earthorbiting satellite (a LEO, with a distance to ground of less than 1000 km) may advantageously be transmitted to a GEO acting as a relay before being directed to the earth via microwaves (see Fig. 4b). Distances for this asymmetric link may be as large as 45 000 km. The concept allows continual data transfer to a single earth station for at least half a LEO orbit. Another use of a laser data link was already included in the upper part of Fig. 1. Characterized by very large distances (e.g. millions of kilometers) and by relatively low data rates (e.g. some 100 kbit/s), such a link would serve to transfer data from interplanetary and deep space probes to relay satellites orbiting the earth. This relay could be equipped with a large receive telescope. Further transport to ground stations would use microwaves. As an alternative, an optical ground station would receive the probe's data after passage through the atmosphere. For satellite networks now being planned or established to serve mobile data transfer, interconnectivity at very high data rates could be achieved by optical links (see Fig. 1). Frequency
allocation problems - as they persist increasingly for radio links - are practically non-existent, with the merit of negligible mutual interference. Another advantage is the expected smaller mass and volume of optical terminals.
6. System technologies
The almost three decades of efforts towards intersatellite laser links have seen various technologies,1-3) starting from those based on lamppumped, mode-locked Nd:YAG lasers,11) on CO2 lasers 5) operating at λ = 10 µm, on GaAlAs diodes (0.85 µm), up to those employing diode-pumped Nd:YAG lasers (λ = 1.06 µm) 12) and InGaAsP semiconductors operating at λ = 1.5 µm. Only a few experimental systems have been launched so far. The European space agency, ESA, has put a terminal on SPOT IV, a LEO earth observation satellite.13) It employs a diode laser at λ = 0.85 µm and shall transmit data at 50 Mbit/s. The counter terminal still awaits its launch on board of the GEO satellite ARTEMIS. The development of this system, dubbed SILEX (semiconductor laser intersatellite link experiment), started as early as 1985. Japan will participate in this experiment by launching, in 2001, a dedicated satellite named OICETS. This LEO satellite is equipped with an optical terminal to communicate with ARTEMIS. - Between 1994 and 1996 a laser link was tested between a terminal placed on the Japanese test satellite ETS-VI and ground stations in Tokyo and in California, although the satellite did not reach the intended GEO orbit but a highly elliptical one.14) The down link operated with a diode laser, the up link with an Argon laser. For future applications, systems based on Nd:YAG lasers 12) and on diode lasers at 1.5 µm in connection with Erbium-doped fiber amplifiers 7) are investigated presently. With the specific properties inherent to these laser sources, they lend themselves especially to coherent detection and to optically preamplified direct detection, respectively. In the future one should take into consideration not only recent technological developments like optical demodulation of phase modulated signals, the use of low-duty-cycle return-to-zero coding, or a combination of both. One should also give serious thoughts to use the large, mature, and reliable technology base commercially available in the 1.5 µm band. Only then one can hope to achieve economy in medium-scale applications like intersatellite networks.
7) 8) 9)
Acknowledgment The author appreciates stimulating discussions with K. Kudielka and P. Winzer.
M. Katzmann (ed.): Laser Satellite Communications (Prentice-Hall Inc.,Englewood Cliffs, 1987). H. P. Lutz: ESA Bulletin 91 (1997) 25. D. L. Begley, R. A. Kobylinski, M. Ross: Intl. J. Satellite Communications 6 (1988) 91. C. Chen, J. W. Alexander, H. Hemmati, S. Monacos, T. Yan, S. Lee, J. R. Lesh, S. Zingales: Proc. Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XI, 1999 (SPIE Vol. 3615) p.142. J. H. McElroy, N. McAvoy, E. H. Johnson, J. J. Degnan, F. E. Goodwin. D. M. Henderson, T. A. Nussmeier, L. S. Stokes, B. J. Peyton, T. Flattau: Proc. IEEE 65 (1977) 221. G. Folcke, J. M. Defrancq, D. Geffroy: Proc. Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies X, 1998 (SPIE Vol. 3266) p.14. W. A. Atia, R. S. Bondurant: Proc. LEOS 12th Annual Meeting, San Francisco,1999, p.226. V. W. S. Chan: J. Lightwave Techn. LT-5 (1987) 633. M. M. Rasztovits, M. A. Schreiblehner, A. L. Scholtz, W. R. Leeb, P. Polacek: Proc. FreeSpace Laser Communication Technologies VII, 1995 (SPIE Vol. 2381) p.302. B. J. Klein and J. J. Degnan: Applied Optics 13 (1974) 2134. M. Ross, P. Freedman, J. Abernathy, G. Matassov, J. Wolf, J. D. Barry: Proc. IEEE 66 (1978) 319. K. Pribil, Ch. Serbe, B. Wandernoth, Ch. Rapp: Proc. Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies VII, 1995 (SPIE Vol. 2381) p.83. T. Tolker-Nielsen, B. Demelenne, E. Desplats: Proc. Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XI, 1999 (SPIE Vol. 3615) p.31. K. Araki, M. Toyoda, M. Toyoshima, M. Shikatani, T. Takahashi, T. Fukazawa, Y. Arimoto: J. Communications Research Lab. 44 (1997) 209.